This sort of discussion will go on and on. However I will make this point.
Auto manufacturers count every cent per vehicle! If they thought that the "green" was sufficient that is all they would use.
If a manufacturer specifies Red (particular spec) and it is more expensive there is a real reason. Normally that will be due to the combination of materials used in the engine and the susceptibility of those materials to galvanic corrosion in combination with the internal operating temperatures of the engine.
It really isn't in any operator's interest to try and second guess a manufacturer's "Materials Engineers"
I'm not a chemist and all I can do is read, observe and talk to people. I know the red was in each time my heater gasket under the throttle chopped out. British offroad know their stuff. I'm happy to go with the change and will report back in a few years. Cheers
When I had Natrad replace my radiator in my 1983 Ford (alloy head), I got the same rave, and went with their inhibitor, as "they would know", instead of Nulon long life. They serviced the cooling system each year as part of warranty condition. After about 3 years.....my head corroded through and it was time for an engine rebuild. I don't trust Natrad.
I am now running the same. My reason. I reckon it is as good as anything around, It is not expensive, comes premixed so no need to worry about water quality, lifetime never needs changing and is compatible with other coolants.
Not that I want to mix it, but when flushing if any old stuff is still present it does not matter.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_d8x2piUzB4]Are all coolants created equal? - YouTube[/ame]
Dave.
I was asked " Is it ignorance or apathy?" I replied "I don't know and I don't care."
1983 RR gone (wish I kept it)
1996 TDI ES.
2003 TD5 HSE
1987 Isuzu County
Kev,
I realise this is an old thread but very interesting. I need to add/replace the coolant in my 110 2006 Defender, after modifying top radiator hose to accommodate temp sender. Tried to buy Castrol Radicool SF-O but no joy, are you still using and happy with Nulon Red OAT?
Hugh.
Hugh.
CAT do a premixed OAT coolant,around $120 for 20LT from Westrac.
Ive been running CAT coolant in both my TD5s for a while now.No issues at all.
Andrew
DISCOVERY IS TO BE DISOWNED
Midlife Crisis.Im going to get stuck into mine early and ENJOY it.
Snow White MY14 TDV6 D4
Alotta Fagina MY14 CAT 12M Motor Grader
2003 Stacer 525 Sea Master Sport
I made the 1 millionth AULRO post
Have a read before using the cat stuff. we test long life coolant for the backhoe I think was on a 1000 hr service. It required we use long life extender additive to get to 4000 hrs then replace.-cant remember but additive was half cost of drum of premixed. read on the bottle it refered to buckets of road KM between replacments.
I often read through these, as a mechanic I often see the the driveway heated discusions about this mine field.
some big brand cars alloy radiators and heater core lasting days. alloy heads months.
I my new job we carry genuine products and test with heavy equipment-but they are covers by fleet insurance policy.
factory coolant.
on the 110 assembly line we used a product. it was red. you get there with a small funnel and screw driver to jamb the coffe cup of crystals in.--cant say I want that in my vehicle.
started in this new job and their was the drum of the same product-Im not using..
old time radiator gents used water and zink blocks--for antifreeze you use a tarp.
Ethylene vs Propylene Glycol | Heat Transfer Fluids | The Dow ChemicEthylene vs. Propylene Glycol
Early in your fluid selection process, you should consider what local requirements might impact your choice. Local regulations or a specific application may require that you decide between the use of an ethylene or a propylene glycol-based fluid.
In most heat transfer applications ethylene glycol-based fluids are your best choice because of their superior heat transfer efficiency. This efficiency is largely due to the lower viscosity of ethylene glycol solutions. Another benefit of this viscosity advantage is lower power consumption for re-circulation pumps and a lower minimum operating temperature. DOWTHERM™ SR-1, DOWTHERM 4000, or DOWCAL™ 10 fluids are EG based fluids.
Propylene glycols are most commonly used in applications in which low acute oral toxicity is required, or for freeze protection where incidental contact with drinking water is possible. In some areas, use of propylene glycols is required by local regulation. Propylene glycol-based fluids are used extensively in food processing applications, but ethylene glycol-based fluids can also be used in some instances. The ingredients in DOWFROST™ and DOWCAL N inhibited propylene glycol-based fluids are generally recognized as safe by the U.S. FDA1. Since these products also have the appropriate approvals, they can be used in immersion freezing of wrapped foods and other food applications where ethylene glycol is not permitted. See Food Product Chilling/Freezing. Generally Recognized As Safe (GRAS) by the US Food and Administration, propylene glycol based DOWFROST can be used in immersion of freezing wrapped foods and other applications where ethylene glycol is not permitted. DOWFROST HD, DOWFROST, DOWCAL 20 fluids are PG based fluids.
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! |
Search All the Web! |
|---|
|
|
|
Bookmarks