Page 6 of 9 FirstFirst ... 45678 ... LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 86

Thread: Red VS Green Coolant again!!!

  1. #51
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Tewantin (NOOSA area)
    Posts
    636
    Total Downloaded
    0
    This sort of discussion will go on and on. However I will make this point.

    Auto manufacturers count every cent per vehicle! If they thought that the "green" was sufficient that is all they would use.

    If a manufacturer specifies Red (particular spec) and it is more expensive there is a real reason. Normally that will be due to the combination of materials used in the engine and the susceptibility of those materials to galvanic corrosion in combination with the internal operating temperatures of the engine.

    It really isn't in any operator's interest to try and second guess a manufacturer's "Materials Engineers"

  2. #52
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Brisbane West
    Posts
    7,373
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Rick Fischer View Post
    This sort of discussion will go on and on. However I will make this point.

    Auto manufacturers count every cent per vehicle! If they thought that the "green" was sufficient that is all they would use.

    If a manufacturer specifies Red (particular spec) and it is more expensive there is a real reason. Normally that will be due to the combination of materials used in the engine and the susceptibility of those materials to galvanic corrosion in combination with the internal operating temperatures of the engine.

    It really isn't in any operator's interest to try and second guess a manufacturer's "Materials Engineers"
    If manufacturers got things right all the time there would be no need for customising to make things better.

    Cheers

  3. #53
    Tombie Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by ozscott View Post
    If manufacturers got things right all the time there would be no need for customising to make things better.

    Cheers
    Better is always subjective..

    "Optimised for purpose" may be a better description.

    For example, if I decided to do a lap of the planet in my D2 TD5 I would be de-tuning it to account for poorer fuels.

    And lowering it back down a bit and running a more common tyre size.

  4. #54
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Brisbane West
    Posts
    7,373
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I'm not a chemist and all I can do is read, observe and talk to people. I know the red was in each time my heater gasket under the throttle chopped out. British offroad know their stuff. I'm happy to go with the change and will report back in a few years. Cheers

  5. #55
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Spostwood
    Posts
    22
    Total Downloaded
    0
    When I had Natrad replace my radiator in my 1983 Ford (alloy head), I got the same rave, and went with their inhibitor, as "they would know", instead of Nulon long life. They serviced the cooling system each year as part of warranty condition. After about 3 years.....my head corroded through and it was time for an engine rebuild. I don't trust Natrad.

  6. #56
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Tatura, Vic
    Posts
    6,336
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by rick130 View Post
    I've been using it for the last twelve-eighteen months in the Patrol and not quite that long in the Landy, so can't report on anything really so far, other than it's a cool colour.

    The reason for changing ?
    Iveco parts are 30km away vs 100km for Caltex, and I can buy the Cummins coolant at a better price

    [edit] sorry for answering a two year old post Andrew
    and it's been renamed PG Platinum.
    I am now running the same. My reason. I reckon it is as good as anything around, It is not expensive, comes premixed so no need to worry about water quality, lifetime never needs changing and is compatible with other coolants.

    Not that I want to mix it, but when flushing if any old stuff is still present it does not matter.


    [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_d8x2piUzB4]Are all coolants created equal? - YouTube[/ame]
    Dave.

    I was asked " Is it ignorance or apathy?" I replied "I don't know and I don't care."


    1983 RR gone (wish I kept it)
    1996 TDI ES.
    2003 TD5 HSE
    1987 Isuzu County

  7. #57
    Hugh_D Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Fluids View Post
    Maybe the quality of the water that's being used is suspect sometimes ?

    I know from the last 25yrs in the pump industry ... water ain't water !

    When I changed over my top radiator hose in the TD5 recently, I took the spigot off the head ... the water gallery I could view with a touch inside the head was spotless. The inside of the spigot and the hose was spotless. I drained, refilled, and drained after running up to temp 5x times, and caught all the drained liquid in a clean tub ... not 1 peice of foreign anything came out.

    I more accustomed to doing this on green coolant vehicles and seeing plenty of junk in the drained water.

    So far, so good, so I'll be sticking with the Nulon Red OAT.

    Kev..
    Kev,
    I realise this is an old thread but very interesting. I need to add/replace the coolant in my 110 2006 Defender, after modifying top radiator hose to accommodate temp sender. Tried to buy Castrol Radicool SF-O but no joy, are you still using and happy with Nulon Red OAT?
    Hugh.

  8. #58
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Williams West Aust
    Posts
    20,998
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Hugh.
    CAT do a premixed OAT coolant,around $120 for 20LT from Westrac.
    Ive been running CAT coolant in both my TD5s for a while now.No issues at all.
    Andrew
    DISCOVERY IS TO BE DISOWNED
    Midlife Crisis.Im going to get stuck into mine early and ENJOY it.
    Snow White MY14 TDV6 D4
    Alotta Fagina MY14 CAT 12M Motor Grader
    2003 Stacer 525 Sea Master Sport
    I made the 1 millionth AULRO post

  9. #59
    Davehoos Guest
    Have a read before using the cat stuff. we test long life coolant for the backhoe I think was on a 1000 hr service. It required we use long life extender additive to get to 4000 hrs then replace.-cant remember but additive was half cost of drum of premixed. read on the bottle it refered to buckets of road KM between replacments.


    I often read through these, as a mechanic I often see the the driveway heated discusions about this mine field.
    some big brand cars alloy radiators and heater core lasting days. alloy heads months.


    I my new job we carry genuine products and test with heavy equipment-but they are covers by fleet insurance policy.


    factory coolant.
    on the 110 assembly line we used a product. it was red. you get there with a small funnel and screw driver to jamb the coffe cup of crystals in.--cant say I want that in my vehicle.

    started in this new job and their was the drum of the same product-Im not using..


    old time radiator gents used water and zink blocks--for antifreeze you use a tarp.

  10. #60
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    13,786
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Ethylene vs. Propylene Glycol

    Early in your fluid selection process, you should consider what local requirements might impact your choice. Local regulations or a specific application may require that you decide between the use of an ethylene or a propylene glycol-based fluid.

    In most heat transfer applications ethylene glycol-based fluids are your best choice because of their superior heat transfer efficiency. This efficiency is largely due to the lower viscosity of ethylene glycol solutions. Another benefit of this viscosity advantage is lower power consumption for re-circulation pumps and a lower minimum operating temperature. DOWTHERM™ SR-1, DOWTHERM 4000, or DOWCAL™ 10 fluids are EG based fluids.

    Propylene glycols are most commonly used in applications in which low acute oral toxicity is required, or for freeze protection where incidental contact with drinking water is possible. In some areas, use of propylene glycols is required by local regulation. Propylene glycol-based fluids are used extensively in food processing applications, but ethylene glycol-based fluids can also be used in some instances. The ingredients in DOWFROST™ and DOWCAL N inhibited propylene glycol-based fluids are generally recognized as safe by the U.S. FDA1. Since these products also have the appropriate approvals, they can be used in immersion freezing of wrapped foods and other food applications where ethylene glycol is not permitted. See Food Product Chilling/Freezing. Generally Recognized As Safe (GRAS) by the US Food and Administration, propylene glycol based DOWFROST can be used in immersion of freezing wrapped foods and other applications where ethylene glycol is not permitted. DOWFROST HD, DOWFROST, DOWCAL 20 fluids are PG based fluids.
    Ethylene vs Propylene Glycol | Heat Transfer Fluids | The Dow Chemic

Page 6 of 9 FirstFirst ... 45678 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!