
 Originally Posted by 
uninformed
					
				 
				Grimace, are your RA the older narrow type or the later wider type?
Greg, make with the updates 

 
			
		 
	 
 I have the wider type in my vehicle.
Just for reference I have attached some photos showing the difference in flex ratio front to rear with the holey bushes and the standard bushes.
Front holey bushes and cranked arms, cranked rear trailing arms, standard link geometry. Standard bushes at chassis end.
EDIT: More info, spring ratios are 220lb front, 186lb rear and retained top and bottom all round.



In all three of these images I was not at full flex and the vehicle drove all without the locker engaged so there is a bit more to be had but the main point is to show just how much difference the radius arm bushes effect the suspension characteristics.
In the next two photos, one is unlocked climbing and still driving, the second is in a wombat hole where I was at full flex in the rear, tyres still on ground but no forward traction without the locker engaged.
These two images alone shows the rear end working a lot harder then the previous images above (meanwhile the front is doing bugger all);


While the car still worked fairly well offroad, it was no where near as compliant with the terrain as it was with the holey bushes installed.
I will be reporting back to this thread with some comparisons once the SF arms have been tested (if given the chance)
Also hope Greg doesn't mind me mentioning this, in regards to any updates. I spoke with him late last week and he is currently doing further testing on all the combinations of bushes and should have some more details once he has completed & compiled all the details for direct comparison.
Cheers
Grimace
				
			 
			
		 
			
				
			
			
				I rule!!!
 
2.4" of Pure FURY!!!
			
			
		 
	
Bookmarks