Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 22

Thread: Intake systems

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Cessnock NSW
    Posts
    1,506
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Intake systems

    Sitting here going through some ideas for my intake system on my 4bd1t and am wanting to increase the diameter of the induction system pipe work.
    I am yet to decide on if I want to run a safari snorkel or make my own snorkel 4" in diameter but the thing I am not sure on is what is best for performance a forward facing snorkel or a reward facing one ?

    I hear all different theories about air ram effects and low pressure pockets for either but I'm yet to see any evidence for either...all offroad comp trucks seem to use reward facing snorkels but goodness knows why that is

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Brisbane Queensland
    Posts
    85
    Total Downloaded
    0

    intake air

    We've spent a lot of time on the dyno and road testing with different vehicles and facing 4" snorkel openings in all different directions.
    We did have a problem with one vehicle (non land rover) when we faced it straight back, at highway speed we had much higher egt's.
    We twisted the head slightly inward and the problem went away.
    The direction of the head doesn't make a massive difference, the size of the intake, the amount of bends and the size of the bends is where you will make your gains. Straighter the better and long flowing bends.
    If you're running a pod or high flow filter with the snorkel facing backwards, be prepared to listen to a lot of induction growl.
    I have a 4" stainless snorkel on our defender, it works a treat.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Suburban Canberra
    Posts
    1,024
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I'll bite.

    If you have a normally aspirated engine and you stick a large (and I mean large) funnel at the front of your car that feeds the air intake you will get a good ram air effect. This was proved many years ago in a Mercedes (don't ask me which one google it).

    If you have a turbo or supercharger you are actively sucking in a lot of air so the Snorkel head is way too small to make a difference. In fact if you have a V8 engine the engine sucks in massive amounts of air and the snorkel heads are way too small to make a difference. I have seen the calculations on this site before.

    The direction of the snorkel head has some bearing one how much mud and crud gets flung down the snorkel, thats all.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    13,786
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Gullible View Post
    ...In fact if you have a V8 engine the engine sucks in massive amounts of air ...
    Not compared to a diesel the same capacity at the same rpm (even NA, let alone turbocharged).

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    brighton, brisbane
    Posts
    33,853
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by aptfab View Post
    We've spent a lot of time on the dyno and road testing with different vehicles .
    Any idea how a Donaldson pre filter effects performance ? Bob
    I’m pretty sure the dinosaurs died out when they stopped gathering food and started having meetings to discuss gathering food

    A bookshop is one of the only pieces of evidence we have that people are still thinking

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Cessnock NSW
    Posts
    1,506
    Total Downloaded
    0
    In conjunction with isuzurover ...the diesel is a different kettle of fish as the amount of air they consume is considerably more than any petrol (2x equivalent size ?) ...the transitions will be as smooth as possible however the Donaldson air box is the restriction (3" inlet/outlet)...intake noise is my last worry but as another member on here likes to say a pod filter is more just a pod no filter...interesting finds on egts I must say...

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Geelong, VIC
    Posts
    4,442
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Just do your own 4" - pretty sure the Safari was never designed to feed what you're planning to hook it up to.

    A 3" inlet/outlet filter might be enough, but as I posted recently I've observed that hooking it a 3" snorkel and corrugated ducting definitely creates a restriction. I'm sure I can improve my setup, but a 4" snorkel would be a better starting point IMHO (especially since you're a lot more fueled up than I am).

    Dougal suggested recently to run one of the Donaldson "Informer" indicators to show the level of restriction. Seems like a useful tool for backyard intake development.
    When my "Informer" arrives, my plan is to disconnect the snorkel, see what the restriction is with just the air filter/housing, then play around with the snorkel ducting etc to try and minimise the restriction when its hooked up.
    I'll also be able to check what effect the Hi-Flo Donaldson tupperware bowl has on it when fitted.

    Steve

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Cessnock NSW
    Posts
    1,506
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by steveG View Post
    Just do your own 4" - pretty sure the Safari was never designed to feed what you're planning to hook it up to.

    A 3" inlet/outlet filter might be enough, but as I posted recently I've observed that hooking it a 3" snorkel and corrugated ducting definitely creates a restriction. I'm sure I can improve my setup, but a 4" snorkel would be a better starting point IMHO (especially since you're a lot more fueled up than I am).

    Dougal suggested recently to run one of the Donaldson "Informer" indicators to show the level of restriction. Seems like a useful tool for backyard intake development.
    When my "Informer" arrives, my plan is to disconnect the snorkel, see what the restriction is with just the air filter/housing, then play around with the snorkel ducting etc to try and minimise the restriction when its hooked up.
    I'll also be able to check what effect the Hi-Flo Donaldson tupperware bowl has on it when fitted.

    Steve
    Thanks Steve you've convinced me to do a 4" snorkel now where did you source the informer from ? Direct from Donaldson ?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Geelong, VIC
    Posts
    4,442
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by c.h.i.e.f View Post
    Thanks Steve you've convinced me to do a 4" snorkel now where did you source the informer from ? Direct from Donaldson ?
    I'm lazy -found a NOS one on eBay for around $30 delivered.
    No idea what Donaldson price is. If its less than $30 don't tell me!!

    Steve

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Tewantin (NOOSA area)
    Posts
    636
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Note for young "players". Donaldson is a "particle separator" needs air velocity sufficient for the swirl to centrifuge the particles out. 3" flow velocity on LR turbo 2.5s is "just good enough".

    Note that with a turbo, 2000 RPM "suck" off road is flowing now where near as much air as 2000 RPM and 90-100 kph down the bitumen.

    Hope this assists.

    Cheers

    RF

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!