Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: 4 cyl motor

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Ipswich. Qld
    Posts
    168
    Total Downloaded
    0

    4 cyl motor

    Hello All

    I have a 109 Ser2a 4 cyl with a new weber carby fitted and am now on unleaded fuel. I have changed the spark plugs to BP6ES as suggested for unleaded fuel. The car starts well and runs well but when on the highway and starting to go up a small hill the car looses speed very quickly.I don't think it should be this bad as when the holden carb was on it seemed to run better.(was using lead fuel then as well) I was thinking that the engine is not tuned properly or the carby might need new jets.
    Would using premium unleaded make a difference?
    Has anybody any comments or suggestions.

    Also i recently fitted parabolic springs and new shocks. The car defnitly rides better on the dirt roads and I am happy with the conversion. I only had a problem with one rear spring getting the bolts out. They had rusted to the bushing sleeve.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Brisbane Australia
    Posts
    598
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Lean under load perhaps.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    where ever I fall asleep ,Queensland
    Posts
    3,034
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Originally posted by shaunp
    Lean under load perhaps.

    to the left or the right??? :?





    sorry , couldnt resist that one ! ops:

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Ipswich. Qld
    Posts
    168
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Thanks for the comment.
    If it is running lean do you know the adjustments on the carby to correct it? Or something else I should check?
    The fuel economy is about 16mpg so I don't think it is too lean.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    2,972
    Total Downloaded
    0
    When I converted to ULP I had trouble getting a smooth idle. I was told the advance curve on the dizzy was too much for ULP and had the dizzy reweighted. Apparently the Land Rover has 30+ degrees of vacuum advance, which is too much for ULP. I still lose power going up hill. I've put the bosch 4 pronged spark plugs in and these made a noticable improvement (though they made no improvement to the Rangie), I've also added electronic ignition, no power boost from that, just for reliability. I've also removed the fan and run an electric fan on thermatic switch. I found that gave the motor more flexibility (pep) at 80-100kph. I'm now running LPG most of the time, so that puts a slight damper on performance, but gives the wallet a performance boost.

    Which parabolics and shocks did you go for? I've used british springs paras with konis on the rear and rancho on the front.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Ipswich. Qld
    Posts
    168
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Thanks for the reply Michael2.
    My paras are Rocky mountain and explorer shocks. I have only had them on a few weeks so haven't had a real test of them but they are much better on the dirt roads.
    As for the engine , I was wondering about the dizzy and the timing, I might try a few different settings to see what happens and try premium ulp to see if there is a difference as well.
    Anybody had experience with weber carbs and the jet sizes?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Ipswich. Qld
    Posts
    168
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Forget to mention...I have an electronic ignition kit from dick smiths which I made up to fit.I have tried it and it seems to work but it is not on at the moment. Need some more time to fit it permently.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Ipswich. Qld
    Posts
    168
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I thought I would update what I have done so far to check the tuneup of the motor. Compression test about 125 psi per cylinder, timing at 6 degrees, idle at 800 revs and checked the settings of the idle and mixture screws on the carby as per the instructions. The mixture screw was set was too rich. The car seems to be running better but need a few more miles to check it and get a better idea on the fuel use.
    On talking to a person who has some experience with webbers, he suggested it might be worthwhile to change the emulsion tube to a slightly larger setting and try it. It would be helpful to use a dyno with a few tubes and jets to try on hand. but at the moment it seems to be o.k. so will stick with this
    Anthony [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif[/img]

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Ipswich. Qld
    Posts
    168
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Dwell angle

    And, anyone happen to know what the dwell angle should be for the 4 cyl motor?
    Thanks

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Godwin Beach Qld
    Posts
    8,688
    Total Downloaded
    0

    4 cyl Motor

    Hi Antvc, [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif[/img]
    Here are some specs for 4 Cyl 2.25 3 mainbearing motors, pre anti-pollution ign timing was
    7:1 Comp = 6 Deg BTDC using 90 Oct Fuel (ULP 91)
    = 3 Deg BTDC using 83 Oct Fuel (old standard)

    8:1 Comp = TDC using 90 Oct (ULP)
    = 3 Deg A T D C using 85 Oct Fuel (old standard)

    On engines fitted with anti-pollution devices the settings are,
    7:1 Comp = 6 Deg ATDC using 90 Oct Fuel.

    ALL READINGS TAKEN WITH VACUUM TUBE DISCONNECTED
    POINTS GAP 0.014--0.016th (0.36-0.040mm)

    CRANKSHAFT ANGLES: Engine RPM
    38*--42* *= Degrees 4500
    30*--34* 3500
    22*--26* 2500
    12*--16* 1200
    04*--12* 900
    00*--04* 600
    Nil below 450

    Plugs Champion N8 = 7:1 or UN12y = 8:1 GAP 0.029-0.032 th (
    0.75-0.080 mm)

    Cheers [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif[/img]

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!