Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 45

Thread: 30 or 49% lower low range ?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW far north coast
    Posts
    17,285
    Total Downloaded
    0

    30 or 49% lower low range ?

    Pros/cons of one vs the other from those that have used either please

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    14,145
    Total Downloaded
    99.87 MB
    What is your vehicle and setup? Engine, gearbox, ratios, tyre size and what type of offroading? I guess its a 130.
    Cheers
    Slunnie


    ~ Discovery II Td5 ~ Discovery 3dr V8 ~ Series IIa 6cyl ute ~ Series II V8 ute ~

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW far north coast
    Posts
    17,285
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Hmmm, that might've helped !

    130, Tdi, R380, 33" tyres mainly used for work, big hills around here but not a lot of sandstone, mostly shale and rock and used for touring too.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Brisbane, Queensland
    Posts
    170
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Hi Rick
    I have a 300tdi 110 running 255/85s, with standard engine and R380. I have the 30% reduction gears and found that this seems to match the tyres well. The vehicle is used off-road regularly for weekend trips and touring. It is set up for touring so I don't do extreme/comp type off-roading.
    So, for my needs I am very happy with the 30% reduction gear set.
    Cheers, Martin
    Last edited by marting; 16th April 2014 at 08:21 PM. Reason: Incorrect Ratios!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    victoria
    Posts
    270
    Total Downloaded
    0
    i've got Maxi 49% in my 130 300tdi (currently with 255/85). had the kit for years but only just got them installed. was advised not to give it the boot when in 1st - could break anything and/or everything as it's too much power. tested them out the other weekend and they are fantastic on the steep stuff. maybe 10% above idle and simply cruised up very slowly.

    gearbox louder in 2nd or higher due to straight cut teeth.

    from what understand the 30% are stronger than the 49% but the 49% suit the 130 better.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    5,101
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Tyres and traction:

    I have 49%.

    When I was out west on 34 swampers it was great. When I was on Fraser with 32 it was a little lowish, but Fraser would be considered easy to moderate 4x4ing at best. I think you will be happy with either in your 130 with 33s. When you do the ratio calcs they both land in between 1st and 2nd high in 5th low. 49% will be a little harder to change from low to high on the fly simply because of the larger difference in ratio from low to high.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW far north coast
    Posts
    17,285
    Total Downloaded
    0
    And the t/case linkages are an abomination making changes on the fly difficult at the best of times.....

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    5,101
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Yeah, tom Sheppard made a aluminum gate that forced him across one side, into neutral, across other side and into high. This forced "pause" in neutral helped with the change apparently. He use to do low to high shifts a lot in his tdi 90 in the deserts

  9. #9
    TonyC is offline Wizard Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    NE Victoria
    Posts
    1,413
    Total Downloaded
    32.83 MB
    Hi Rick,
    Give some thought to your top speed in low range, and how you use the truck.
    My old Isuzu County had that nice low, low range 1st that was great, but I couldn't bring myself to do more than about 20 km/h in low 4th for any length of time.
    Were as the Defender (300Tdi, R380, 130, 255/85R16s) will do twice that in low 5th.
    For what I do, High Country and Desert touring, there is no way I'd go the 49% gears and I would think very hard before even the 30% ones.

    One the other hand a 3 speed transfer, or a 4BD1T and Isuzu 6 speed with the 7:1 first. MMMMM

    Tony

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Stanwell Park, NSW
    Posts
    1,668
    Total Downloaded
    666.1 KB
    Based on Ashcroft ratio calculator a 30% reduction for a TDI is about 62:1 for first low. A standard Puma is about 64:1 in first low. Can you borrow a puma for a comparison?

    Granted the ratio step up from first to second in the puma is wider than the R380. But you fit reduction gears for the benefit of first low primarily.

    MLD

Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!