Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 32

Thread: Gearing, what's it mean?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    samford
    Posts
    535
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Smile Gearing, what's it mean?

    Land-Rover Series l (80in model) Produced 1948 to 1951
    Engine: 4-cyl, 69.5 x 105mm, 1,595cc, CR 6.8:1, Solex Carb. 50bhp (net) at 4,000rpm. Maximum torque 80lb ft at 2,000rpm.

    Transmission: Permanent four-wheel-drive with free-wheel in front drive. Front and rear differentials. High and low range of gears. Axle ratios 4.7:1. High range step down ratio 1.148:1: overall gear ratio 5.396, 8.039, 11.023, 16.165, reverse 13.743:1. low range step-down ratio 2.89: overall ratios 13.578, 20.229, 27.738, 40.676 reverse 34.581:1. Synchromesh on top and third gears.

    Suspension and Brakes: Live front axle, half elliptic leaf springs, telescopic dampers, live rear axle, half elliptic leaf springs, telescopic dampers. Worm and nut steering 10 by 1 and a half inch front and rear drum brakes. 6.0 -16in or 7.00 - 16in tyres.

    Dimensions: Wheelbase 6ft 8in (80in); front and rear tracks 4ft 2in, Length 11ft 6in; width 5ft 1in, height (hood up) 5ft 10.5in. Unladen weight 2,594lb Max payload 1,000l

    Have a look at this Jeep, I don't understand the gearing?

    http://files.asme.org/ASMEORG/Commun...marks/5578.pdf

  2. #2
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is offline RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,659
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I don't see the problem, I'm afraid. The overall gear ratio, in each case, is given by :-

    Gearbox ratio X Transfer Case ratio X Diff ratio.

    A couple of the Jeep calculated overall ratios appear to be in error, or rather rounded, so it does not work out exactly.

    Interesting specification for comparison with the 80" - dimensions were almost identical, but the Landrover was around 150lbs heavier - but with this you got another 200lbs payload, three seats across the front, 12v electrics, and a four speed box. Engine power and torque were virtually the same, although the Willys engine was smaller.

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    canberra
    Posts
    3,002
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Bit off topic but the weight difference could nearly be put down the the chassis size alown

  4. #4
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is offline RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,659
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 460cixy View Post
    Bit off topic but the weight difference could nearly be put down the the chassis size alown
    And the 12v battery, doors, larger generator, larger engine, four speed gearbox.

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Brisbane, Inner East.
    Posts
    11,178
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Draw yourself a gear split chart and all will be clear.

    Formula for road speed is 60 x rpm/tyre revs per kilometre x overall gear ratio
    URSUSMAJOR

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    canberra
    Posts
    3,002
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by JDNSW View Post
    And the 12v battery, doors, larger generator, larger engine, four speed gearbox.

    John
    Yeah fair call

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    35
    Total Downloaded
    0

    comparison

    The jeep engine is 2.2 litres,60 HP and 105 ft lbs torque as fitted to an MB Willys Jeep. Regards John

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    1,481
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by JDNSW View Post
    And the 12v battery, doors, larger generator, larger engine, four speed gearbox.

    John
    Except the Lucas 12V generator is smaller than the Autolite 6V generator.
    Aaron

  9. #9
    2stroke Guest
    I seem to recollect the 80" having 4.88 diffs? Could be wrong as it's been decades since I had one.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    1,481
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Early 80" had a different differential ratio to 1949 and onwards.
    Aaron

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!