Hey I was just pointing out what was queried a few posts earlier. If someone wants to find the calculations there's heaps of stuff online. But (and I hate going here but seen it happen on more than one brake mod) master cyl undersized for volumetric requirements of system, accident, accident investigation pull the car apart (and they will) and suddenly no insurance and half a dozen extra charges.
But what do I know, just used to design hydraulic systems and reference engineer brake systems for mods.
I'll have my head back now thanks and **** back off to my corner.
AND????
what exactly is the point your trying to prove here with me...
The part number was given to me in a PM it stated as I think I have said twice in this thread already Defender and RRC it was probably for D1 too, I said I didn't know because they never stated that in the PM and I never looked it up...
So Dougal rather sitting here trying to prove a point that doesnt need to even be proven, as I never disagreed with you in the first place, how about we just move on hey..
Our Land Rover does not leak oil! it just marks its territory.......
I never looked up that specific part number to confirm that it said D1 on there as well...I'm sure it does! but I never looked it up so there for I'm not going to write it,simple really
I don't really know how I can explain it any other way
so if you want to keep going on about it thats Ok but just please stop quoting me....because it just comes across like your trying to prove a point and as I said before I'm not arguing with the information you have given. Was only explaining what was in my PM
thats why im getting frustrated.
So again lets move on...
Our Land Rover does not leak oil! it just marks its territory.......
So to recap.
The calipers you need have 46mm pistons instead of the stock 41.3mm.
The master cylinder remains the same.
Some calipers have metric sized bolt holes, some are imperial. A drill sorts any problems out.
You will need to replumb from dual line fronts (if you have them) to single line. Most MC's can be converted. You replumb so the circuit split is front/rear (like all other vehicles).
The decision to remove or retain the rear brake pressure reducing valve is made depending on how your brake bias suits the loading of your vehicle. My vehicle works better with it removed.
The total extra stroke on the pedal is 16%. A completely insignificant amount.
Hmmm...
Mr literal. You won't find calculations online but you will find information and even online calculators plus how to do it on paper.
Maybe you walk around with every calculation in your head ready to prove everyone wrong at every opportunity but while I know what formulas are I'll always reference something to make sure. Added to which there are many people on here for whom such a conversion is mechanically simple but it's easy for someone to assume that because it works it's correct.
As for scare mongering, been in the sharp end of the stick and only my knowledge, experience and qualifications saved me from 10+ years after an accident that I could prove was someone else's fault because of exactly what I mentioned.
So you can sit safely in your pit of knowledge. I'd rather over inform someone and make them aware of the potential issues than have something happen and know that they should have done something different.
Lou, I now understand your frustration.
It's an extremely simple calculation. One line.
No references, no on-line calculators. Just a simple understanding of what is going on.
You have 12 pistons total. 8 are now 25% bigger area.
8/12 x 25% = 16.6%
Which is 16.6% more pedal travel.
Scaremongering is not overinforming. It is deliberately spreading misinformation. Which is the complete opposite.
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! |
Search All the Web! |
|---|
|
|
|
Bookmarks