Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 19 of 19

Thread: Uni Joint coupling

  1. #11
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is offline RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,522
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I don't see a mechanical problem with it - but I fail to see the advantage either.

    The use of needle roller bearings to allow slow intermittent movement where there is no requirement for low friction seems to be a bit of overkill.

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Moruya Heads/Sth. Coast, NSW
    Posts
    6,532
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I don't like the fact that it is all held together by 4 snap rings and I have found that needle roller bearings where there is limited movement (rotation) tend to wear quickly in one area, Regards Frank.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Melbourn(ish)
    Posts
    26,503
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Aaron IIA View Post
    I was referring to one hookes joint being used to tow the trailer, and another hookes joint being used to provide power from the p.t.o.

    Aaron
    Do you mean like the one that was prototyped for one of the forward control series that had a propshaft in the center and a much bigger version of a uj with the center hollowed out for it to mont in?

    Worked well except the outer "uj" tended to bind

    Sent from my SM-G920I using AULRO mobile app
    Dave

    "In a Landrover the other vehicle is your crumple zone."

    For spelling call Rogets, for mechanicing call me.

    Fozzy, 2.25D SIII Ex DCA Ute
    Tdi autoManual d1 (gave it to the Mupion)
    Archaeoptersix 1990 6x6 dual cab(This things staying)


    If you've benefited from one or more of my posts please remember, your taxes paid for my skill sets, I'm just trying to make sure you get your monies worth.
    If you think you're in front on the deal, pay it forwards.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    1,481
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Like this one?

    http://www.4wdonline.com/Mil/LandRov...d.trailer.html

    I was envisaging a similiar trailer, but with two sepetate, yet same style, universal joint coupled shafts.

    Aaron

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    14,147
    Total Downloaded
    99.87 MB
    I think I'd prefer a treg coupling.
    Cheers
    Slunnie


    ~ Discovery II Td5 ~ Discovery 3dr V8 ~ Series IIa 6cyl ute ~ Series II V8 ute ~

  6. #16
    350RRC's Avatar
    350RRC is offline ForumSage Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Bellarine Peninsula, Brackistan
    Posts
    5,502
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Slunnie View Post
    I think I'd prefer a treg coupling.
    And from memory when the soft bit wears out, one (presumably hi-tensile) bolt has to chew through another before the coupling is 'N/S'.

    DL

  7. #17
    schuy1 Guest
    I think the end loading, ie forward/ backward vibration caused by a corrugated road would soon see off a solid mounted UJ system like that. needle rollers in general dont like that type of impacts. Apart from that cant see a need.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Melbourn(ish)
    Posts
    26,503
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Aaron IIA View Post
    Like this one?

    Rubery Owen Powered Trailer for Land Rover 101

    I was envisaging a similiar trailer, but with two sepetate, yet same style, universal joint coupled shafts.

    Aaron
    exactly like that one.
    Dave

    "In a Landrover the other vehicle is your crumple zone."

    For spelling call Rogets, for mechanicing call me.

    Fozzy, 2.25D SIII Ex DCA Ute
    Tdi autoManual d1 (gave it to the Mupion)
    Archaeoptersix 1990 6x6 dual cab(This things staying)


    If you've benefited from one or more of my posts please remember, your taxes paid for my skill sets, I'm just trying to make sure you get your monies worth.
    If you think you're in front on the deal, pay it forwards.

  9. #19
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is offline RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,522
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by schuy1 View Post
    I think the end loading, ie forward/ backward vibration caused by a corrugated road would soon see off a solid mounted UJ system like that. needle rollers in general dont like that type of impacts. Apart from that cant see a need.
    I doubt that the vibration from corrugations etc would be a problem with a universal joint - failures of these on propeller shafts are not a common result of operation on corrugated roads where the tyres skipping on corrugations transfer the vibration to the drive train. And half axles with two U-joints and no slip joint have been used without problems as suspension links - Rover 2000 from memory. In this use, the vibration loads would be at least as large.

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!