Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 29

Thread: D3 or RRsport TDV6

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Down the road from Sydney
    Posts
    14,702
    Total Downloaded
    0
    hi

    just thought i would tell you what a landrover guy said to me when i asked him which one would he buy of the two back in the uk....

    he said buy a disco, the rangerover sport is a disco with a very expensive
    body kit on.............

    and boyfriend said he's not sure you would have to check but he seems to think that the d3 has more wheel travel than the range rover sport if your thinking of going off road (asuming you are by the pec your after)

    and he said may also possibly have slightly more ground clearance but like i said check up on that

    dullbird
    Our Land Rover does not leak oil! it just marks its territory.......




  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Nedlands, WA
    Posts
    2,012
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I am very pleased with my D3.

    If you want extra space and a choice of aftermarket accessories, then go for the D3.

    If you don't need either then go for the RRS.

    Also, if you are looking at an SE D3, then the cost difference will come into it too. At RRP, the RRS is just over a grand more expensive than the HSE D3 (both TDV6) and (based on a test drive of one) the RRS is slightly less specced than the HSE, but still has TR etc.

    I think that the only reason that there has not been much said about RRS probs is simply because bugger all have been off-road to really test things!

    And, I would estimate that it may be some time before non-LR accessories are available for the RRS.

    If I was in the financial position to do so, i would have both! At the end of the day, they're both great cars. it just depends what you want it for.

  3. #13
    HSVRangie Guest
    uses:

    travel to work;

    light to medium off road use. Although I will push it to its limits.

    I have the RR for extreme 4x4 and playing in.

    Mostly there will only be me in it, and 2 kids off rd.

    RRS is more expensive and not as well speced but.

    Will see what the dealers come up with. I believe the sport will be as capable as the d3 off road maybe more so.

    Michael.

  4. #14
    p38arover's Avatar
    p38arover is offline Major part of the heart and soul of AULRO.com
    Administrator
    I'm here to help you!
    Gold Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Western Sydney
    Posts
    30,707
    Total Downloaded
    1.63 MB
    Also check out these RR fora:

    http://rangerovers.net/forum/index.php

    There is a RRS specific forum.

    Ron
    Ron B.
    VK2OTC

    2003 L322 Range Rover Vogue 4.4 V8 Auto
    2007 Yamaha XJR1300
    Previous: 1983, 1986 RRC; 1995, 1996 P38A; 1995 Disco1; 1984 V8 County 110; Series IIA



    RIP Bucko - Riding on Forever

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Nedlands, WA
    Posts
    2,012
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Originally posted by HSVRangie
    uses:

    travel to work;

    light to medium off road use. Although I will push it to its limits.

    I have the RR for extreme 4x4 and playing in.

    Mostly there will only be me in it, and 2 kids off rd.

    RRS is more expensive and not as well speced but.

    Will see what the dealers come up with. I believe the sport will be as capable as the d3 off road maybe more so.

    Michael.
    In that case, I reckon go for the RRS!

  6. #16
    HSVRangie Guest
    what do people think D3 or RRS will be worth after 3 years.

    aprox 30-40k per year

    car will be lease Residual = ???????

    Michael

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Toowoomba
    Posts
    6,151
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Hey HSV Rangie,

    I did mine as bill of sale over 48mths with a 35% residual with $20k in upfront. I would hope it would be worth $30-35k in 4 yrs, cripes I hope so. Hopefully with the new model, depreciation wont be to the extent that I am finding out about previous models 8O . Grab the papers and have a look at what they are selling now and formulate it over a 3 yr period should give a rough estimate. In general terms, most lenders (dependant on vehicle) will want a residual around the 35-40% mark,

    Regards

    Stevo

  8. #18
    HSVRangie Guest
    On previous Rover products the depreciation is huge you would need a resiual of about 20% to come out of it with out throughing extra cash into it after lease expires.

    This is my one major concern, damn rover and thier crap reputation.

    Michael.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    gosford
    Posts
    824
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Depreciation on both these cars will be huge perhaps worse than current rovers . Reason being that most people in the motor trade will tell you that anone that can afford a new one can afford running costs. The problem is that these cars are packed with high tech stuff that usually fails with age. Therefore most second hand buyers can't afford repairs.

    It's as simple as that just ask car valuers most will give you the same answer to that question. I will still trade up regards of huge depreciation because I love Land Rovers. 8)

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Toowoomba
    Posts
    6,151
    Total Downloaded
    0
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE</div><div class='quotemain'>The problem is that these cars are packed with high tech stuff that usually fails with age. Therefore most second hand buyers can't afford repairs.
    [/b][/quote]

    I cant agree/ disagree with comments made in respect to depreciation, however most cars these days ( pick a brand/model/make) and they have high tech stuff in them. Failure is yet to be determined, no doubt 20 yrs ago people were saying the same thing, even 5 yrs ago, whether cars or other forms of technology.

    Secondly all cars are liabilities, naturally one wants to minimise the impact of depreciation, but hey. A couple of years ago my father sold his Merc S500 which I think was purchased for $265k, he sold it couple of years later for $170k. You can pick any model and most will have certain levels of depreciation. If however the brand as in LR have picked up their game and can reinvent their brand image in the market place, which I feel will happen with the D3's, RRS, RR, then this could also impact on values in the future. Ahhh WTFK :wink: ,

    Regards

    Stevo

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!