Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: Phantom rough idling issue in a straight V8 Discovery 2

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2024
    Location
    Sydney, NSW
    Posts
    36
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Question Phantom rough idling issue in a straight V8 Discovery 2

    Dear brain trust:


    My D2a V8 has a rough idling issue which I can't seem to fix. It also throws up a lot of O2 diagnostic trouble codes. Car has around 120,000 km on it.


    Confirmed:

    • P0130 - O2 bank 1 circuit malfunction
    • P0171 - system too lean bank 1 (passenger's side)
    • P1171 -
    • P1174 -
    • P0150 - O2 bank 2 circuit malfunction (driver's side)
    • P0174 - system too lean bank 2



    Here's what I've tried in order:

    1. I changed spark plugs (8x NGK)
    2. I tried 3x different MAFs (2x brand new Bosch, 1x from a wreck)
    3. I changed air filter, and air filter top lid (clamp was broken)
    4. Mechanic changed spark plug leads (aftermarket, grey ones)
    5. I changed O2 sensors (2x new Bosch)



    Unrelated work done:

    • Mechanic: changed rocker cover gaskets (big leak before), thermostat, water pump, coolant flush, throttle body base (big coolant leak).
    • Mechanic visually inspected at vacuum hoses, doesn't see any damage or cracks.



    Numbers I'm getting via OBD2:


    0km/h (idle, coolant 26-40C)
    980-872 RPM
    40-20 kg/h MAF
    Bank 1: 0.45-0.54V, 7-19% trim
    Bank 2: 0.37-0.75V, 2-11% trim


    0km/h (idle, coolant 81-87C)
    614-703 RPM
    10-16 kg/h MAF
    Bank 1: 0.03-0.06V, 25% trim
    Bank 2: 0.01-0.06V, 0-25% trim


    11km/h (87C)
    1639 RPM
    108 kg/h MAF
    Bank 1: 0.89V 17% trim
    Bank 2: 0.74V -6% trim


    53km/h (87C)
    1286 RPM
    29 kg/h MAF
    Bank 1: 0.04V 15% trim
    Bank 2: 0.04V 17% trim


    48km/h (87C)
    1684 RPM
    91 kg/h MAF
    Bank 1: 0.39V 2% trim
    Bank 2: 0.53V -3% trim


    (Trim and MAF numbers have been rounded.)






    What do you suggest that I try next?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Newborough, VIC
    Posts
    1,546
    Total Downloaded
    67.72 MB
    Did you do the reset thingy with the Nanocom after replacing the sensors?
    2002 D2 4.6L V8 Auto SLS+2" ACE CDL Truetrac(F) Nanocom(V8 only)

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2024
    Location
    Sydney, NSW
    Posts
    36
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by biggin View Post
    Did you do the reset thingy with the Nanocom after replacing the sensors?
    You mean clearing the error codes? Yep, I cleared them with my ODB2 reader (Vgate device, iOS app Car Scanner).

    I don't have a Nanocom (pricey!)

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Universe A
    Posts
    2,763
    Total Downloaded
    0
    You need to reset the adaptions.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    The Hills.
    Posts
    20,107
    Total Downloaded
    152.79 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by MAF Diver View Post

    I don't have a Nanocom (pricey!)
    Not compared to the parts canon.
    ​JayTee

    Nullus Anxietus

    Cancer is gender blind.

    2000 D2 TD5 Auto: Tins
    1994 D1 300TDi Manual: Dave
    1980 SIII Petrol Tray: Doris
    OKApotamus #74
    Nanocom, D2 TD5 only.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Newborough, VIC
    Posts
    1,546
    Total Downloaded
    67.72 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by shack View Post
    You need to reset the adaptions.
    Yeh, that’s what I meant. Phantom rough idling issue in a straight V8 Discovery 2
    2002 D2 4.6L V8 Auto SLS+2" ACE CDL Truetrac(F) Nanocom(V8 only)

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2024
    Location
    Sydney, NSW
    Posts
    36
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by shack View Post
    You need to reset the adaptions.
    Ah, gotcha. Does disconnecting the battery do this?

    Can other tools do this apart from a Nanocom? A friend has a fancy Autel but he's out of town at the moment

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Universe A
    Posts
    2,763
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by MAF Diver View Post
    Ah, gotcha. Does disconnecting the battery do this?

    Can other tools do this apart from a Nanocom? A friend has a fancy Autel but he's out of town at the moment
    I don't know if disconnecting the battery will reset or not, other tools would work bit I don't know which ones.

    The Motronic has pretty good OBD2 compliance so should be reasonably easy to sort.


    Secondly, whilst I'm unable to get to a computer at the minute, I quickly did the sums in my head on your MAF readings.

    You quote an RPM of 900 with a mass air reading of 40 kg/hr, that alone should set off alarm bells. A 4 litre 4 stroke engine @ 900 RPM should =

    8*500mg*(RPM/2)*60

    = 4000*450*60= 108 kg/hr @ 900 rpm.

    The 500mg is a rough guess based on sea level and pleasant ambient temps!!

    If the engine is fuelling based on 40 kg/hr, it will be running dangerously lean.

    What I don't understand is that it *should*
    Still be running closed loop, although maybe it's so far out of whack the adaptions are OOR, so open loop it is...??

    Either way, don't run it like that, it'll be a bit hard on the valves.

    *Disclaimer, I know almost nothing about the Motronic 5.2.1 engine management system and petrol engines!!

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Universe A
    Posts
    2,763
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Update to the above..

    I had opportunity to test car scanner on a V8 D2 and got the same air mass reading.

    I'm pretty certain that the car scanner app is misreporting g/s as kg/hr.

    So 40 g/s = 144 kg/hr.

    That means the issue lay elsewhere.

    And that's why dedicated tools are the go.... It stops premature firing of the afore mentioned Cannon.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2024
    Location
    Sydney, NSW
    Posts
    36
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Oh, interesting! Thanks for looking into this mate!

    The mechanic looked at it with his Solus Edge Snap-On (way more advanced than the Car Scanner app) and it showed the same kg/h readings. Does your Nanocom show something else?

    Also, I noticed that while driving, both ECUs run in closed loop, but when stopped at a traffic light, I get ECU2 at open loop (but ECU1 stays closed loop):

    O2.jpg

    (Also, there's two ECUs?)

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!