Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: TDi 200 or TDi 300 pros and cons please!

  1. #1
    roadkill Guest

    TDi 200 or TDi 300 pros and cons please!

    I am interested in anyone feelings towards the two, postive or negitave, especially toward engine life after the 250 000 km mark.

    What radical changes were made to the 200 that makes it such a better engine?

    Any thoughts from prev owners welcomed



    Prevent inbreeding, ban country music.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    2,622
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Roadkill,
    I have owned both vehicles & loved them both for their simplicity.
    The 300, i personally think is a more refined engine. It pulls a little harder & isnt so noisy. Its a lot easier getting parts for too.
    The 300 is still being built in Brasil now called the TGV HS2800, which just quietly leaves my TD5 for dead & no electronics, slight difference but basically the same.
    The 300's need the timing belt replaced at every 80k km(book says 100, but better to be safe than sorry), whereas the 200 every 100k km & have not heard a lot of problems with the 200 snapping belts.
    Both are 2.5 ltr 4 cyl < both also get great fuel economy too.
    Both mine lasted well into the late 200k km mark with my 200 going to 289k km before i sold it, the 300 left me at 257k km.
    I still see both of them on the road, one not as good as she used to be..sadly..but i enjoyed both of them, they took me to many places in Aus

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Nanny state UK...
    Posts
    3,253
    Total Downloaded
    0
    300TDi is my prefered out of the two for the following:

    Slightly more refined.
    Slightly more power output.
    Better laid out on the front for servicing.

    HTH

    M

  4. #4
    VladTepes's Avatar
    VladTepes is offline Major Part of the Heart and Soul of AULRO Subscriber
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Bracken Ridge, Qld
    Posts
    16,055
    Total Downloaded
    0
    200Tdi is my favourite because that's what I could afford at the time.
    It's not broken. It's "Carbon Neutral".


    gone


    1993 Defender 110 ute "Doris"
    1994 Range Rover Vogue LSE "The Luxo-Barge"
    1994 Defender 130 HCPU "Rolly"
    1996 Discovery 1

    current

    1995 Defender 130 HCPU and Suzuki GSX1400


  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    near Kilmore central Vic but work in Melb every day :(
    Posts
    359
    Total Downloaded
    0
    sort of right
    the 300Tdi is still being built in Brazil but it's the HS2500
    LR apparently still use it for some military application in sth Africa ?? where they don't want complicated electronic engines (someone will correct where they use it I'm sure)
    the HS2800 TGV is actually a ford engine for the ranger (sth American F150 but uses the same block as the 300Tdi / HS2500)
    LR demoed it and said it was to powerful ??? what the ?? and went with the Td5 instead in the D2
    I've always imported the HS2800 cause anyone spending $10k on a new engine wants the best they can get (bang for buck) and the HS2500 was only $300 cheaper and still a 300Tdi (the TGV is 35% up on HP & torque)
    the HS2500 is now $500 dearer than a TGV so why would anyone want one over a TGV ???

    Jase

    PS to answer your question
    both well cared for are good for a long time, I yanked a 300tdi out my 130 to fit a TGV earlier in the year it (the 300) had done a head (not uncommon on either Tdi) but when the head was removed pistons ect were all perfect it had done 400,000kms (just I wanted a TGV and had the right contact )
    I've never owned a 200 (only a few 300's) but my LR mechanic mate recons the 200's are a better engine, My answer would be to buy either, just make sure either is in good nic and buy based on condition (of engine and car) not type
    J


    Quote Originally Posted by sniegy
    Roadkill,
    I have owned both vehicles & loved them both for their simplicity.
    The 300, i personally think is a more refined engine. It pulls a little harder & isnt so noisy. Its a lot easier getting parts for too.
    The 300 is still being built in Brasil now called the TGV HS2800, which just quietly leaves my TD5 for dead & no electronics, slight difference but basically the same.
    The 300's need the timing belt replaced at every 80k km(book says 100, but better to be safe than sorry), whereas the 200 every 100k km & have not heard a lot of problems with the 200 snapping belts.
    Both are 2.5 ltr 4 cyl < both also get great fuel economy too.
    Both mine lasted well into the late 200k km mark with my 200 going to 289k km before i sold it, the 300 left me at 257k km.
    I still see both of them on the road, one not as good as she used to be..sadly..but i enjoyed both of them, they took me to many places in Aus

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Braidwood, NSW
    Posts
    103
    Total Downloaded
    0
    My 300Tdi has just passed the 275000 mark and still goes very well. No sign of oil usage or being smokey. I have had the leaks - front oil seal on the cam went, manifold water gaskets, etc, but nothing major. Whenever a leak problem happened where a modified replacement sorts out the problem permanently I've had it installed and there's no more problem.

    On the other side I've owned a Defender with a 300Tdi which was really badly treated by its former owner and it did have odd problems. Had to do the head gasket and shave the head to get it to stop leaking water. If you find one that's been overheated then you'll probably have problems.
    Norm

    2011 D4 TDV6 (Audrey)
    99 Defender 130 single cab ute 300Tdi (Mabel)
    99 S1 Disco Tdi (Grumble)
    -ex 97 S1 Disco V8i (Beast)
    -ex 94 Defender Tdi (Antichrist II)
    -ex 98 S1 Disco Tdi
    -ex 78 Strangie (The Bucket)

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Sydney's gritty inner west (2204) and verdant Mount Wilson
    Posts
    7,447
    Total Downloaded
    0
    If the motor comes with the rest of the vehicle then the significant difference will be the transmission.

    The manual 200 was coupled to the LT77 box and the manual 300 to the R380 box. The latter being a stronger unit (or at least I am led to believe).
    Mahn England

    DEFENDER 110 D300 SE '23 (the S M E G)

    Ex DEFENDER 110 wagon '08 (the Kelvinator)
    http://www.aulro.com/afvb/members-rides/105691-one_iotas-110-inch-kelvinator.html

    Ex 300Tdi Disco:



  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Medowie N.S.W
    Posts
    494
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Well 285,000k's and touch wood still good, gotta love the 300TDI!
    Don't use any oil runs smooth start's first go every go and go's and go's and go's.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Sydney's gritty inner west (2204) and verdant Mount Wilson
    Posts
    7,447
    Total Downloaded
    0
    This thread from earlier days is worth the read

    The longevity of Tdi engines:

    http://www.aulro.com/afvb/showthread.php't=27192
    Mahn England

    DEFENDER 110 D300 SE '23 (the S M E G)

    Ex DEFENDER 110 wagon '08 (the Kelvinator)
    http://www.aulro.com/afvb/members-rides/105691-one_iotas-110-inch-kelvinator.html

    Ex 300Tdi Disco:



  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    VIC
    Posts
    3,536
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Essentially there is no radical difference between the 200 and 300. Both have the same power and torque ouput according to factory figures. Both are very strong reliable engines, my preference lies with the 200 for the following reasons:

    There isnt an issue with the timing belts. When I was buying my disco you could find a VGC 300 but if it was in the faulty VIN range without the fix...

    I prefer seperate drive belts for ancillaries. My alternator seized and destroyed itself 400 km from anywhere and I was still able to drive by simply removing the belt. If you had a 300 this would present a problem (and alternators will readily seize... just add sand and mud).

    As for the gearboxes, I have had no issues with my LT77S. I would prefer the more convention gear layout, but apart from that there hasnt been any issues.

    Both engine and gearbox have 295,000kms

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!