Page 5 of 14 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 134

Thread: Narrow tyres V Wide tyres

  1. #41
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    14,147
    Total Downloaded
    99.87 MB
    Now that would be awsome! Probably speed rated to 500km/h also.
    Cheers
    Slunnie


    ~ Discovery II Td5 ~ Discovery 3dr V8 ~ Series IIa 6cyl ute ~ Series II V8 ute ~

  2. #42
    p38arover's Avatar
    p38arover is offline Major part of the heart and soul of AULRO.com
    Administrator
    I'm here to help you!
    Gold Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Western Sydney
    Posts
    30,708
    Total Downloaded
    1.63 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by Slunnie View Post
    Now that would be awsome! Probably speed rated to 500km/h also.
    ...pity the 'Fender isn't!

    Ron
    Ron B.
    VK2OTC

    2003 L322 Range Rover Vogue 4.4 V8 Auto
    2007 Yamaha XJR1300
    Previous: 1983, 1986 RRC; 1995, 1996 P38A; 1995 Disco1; 1984 V8 County 110; Series IIA



    RIP Bucko - Riding on Forever

  3. #43
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    2,972
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Blknight.aus View Post
    I found out something today...

    F111 nose wheels are 16 inch.........The buggers fit.

    But I cant get em.. But that aint gunna stop me trying.
    The Leyland brothers used aircraft tyres on one of the vehicles on their first West - East crossing. While the regular tyres survived the trip, the aircraft tyres were down to canvas shreds.

  4. #44
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is offline RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,521
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Michael2 View Post
    The Leyland brothers used aircraft tyres on one of the vehicles on their first West - East crossing. While the regular tyres survived the trip, the aircraft tyres were down to canvas shreds.
    I was working in the Simpson when they passed through - we were using aircraft tyres on most of our our heavy vehicles, but light vehicles (mostly Landcruisers) were using 9.00x13 sand tyres. My 2a was running on 7.50x16 steel radial road tyres.

    Most of Leyland Bros problems with that crossing were a result of their being grossly overloaded.

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  5. #45
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is offline RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,521
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Blknight.aus View Post
    I found out something today...

    F111 nose wheels are 16 inch.........

    I just happend to see a us one in the aircraft parts store across the way...

    you can guess the rest if you know me...


    the outcome...

    The buggers fit.

    But I cant get em.. But that aint gunna stop me trying.
    The end of F111 service is in sight. I wonder how many spare nose tyres will still be in stock then......?

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  6. #46
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Brisbane, Queensland (Australia)
    Posts
    1,461
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by JDNSW View Post
    The end of F111 service is in sight. I wonder how many spare nose tyres will still be in stock then......?

    John
    It makes a nice mind picture. F111's all nose down on the runway and some guy, who I won't mention, smiling with a trailer load going out the gate .

  7. #47
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Avoca Beach
    Posts
    14,152
    Total Downloaded
    0
    One thing to consider is likely usage.
    Most 15inch "floatation" tyres have a much lighter load rating than an LT 70-75-or 80 series, and most do not have LTconstruction with heavier sidewalls.
    I recall someone complaining of blowouts in 15 inch BFG MTs some time ago, and it appeared that the tyres were overloaded as their load rating was less than the minimum for the car concerned.
    So if you are using the car for long distance heavy load work, stick to 75s or so, or at least make sure the load rating is sufficient.
    For competition,its true that most have wide tyres, but I wonder how much is fashion and availability.

    Certainly on road, a car with solid axles like a RRC or Disco, I find much better with relatively narrow tyres, say 75s. IMHO the reason for this is that the front geometry is designed for tyres where the loads are near the bearing centre. Wide tyres tramline and dart more because the loads may be further away from the bearing centreline. I believe that this is why the D2 has a much different front geometry than D1 or RRC. Fashion dictated wider tyres, so LR had to change the geometry.
    Regards Philip A

  8. #48
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    25
    Total Downloaded
    0
    What about Dunlop Super Gripper 7.5R16LT's for my S2a, anyone had used them?

  9. #49
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    13,786
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by incisor View Post
    and what rim are you running them on?
    If that was directed at me - modified disco steels.

  10. #50
    tombraider Guest
    Fashion didnt dictate a thing.

    More rubber = Better braking, more grip...

    And offset affects handling far more than tyre width...

    I could fit a 7.50R on an offset rim and it would drive like rubbish.

    Or run my 305s on correctly set offset rims and have no tramlining or adverse effects at all...

Page 5 of 14 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!