Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 38

Thread: Air Filter Tests - Teaser

  1. #11
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is offline RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,539
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by isuzurover View Post
    Always the pedant aren't you John . An NA engine normally has near 100% volumetric efficiency at the peak of the torque curve (which is where you want to be driving it most of the time).

    For a 300Tdi that is 1800rpm. For a 3.9V8 that is 2500-3000rpm. If the V8 has 100% volumetric efficiency, and the TDI has 116% VE (boost is approx 16% of an atmosphere) - then my back of the envelope calcs say that the Tdi will be flowing about 45 lps, and the V8 85 lps (at 2500rpm). Even if you drop the revs to 1800, the V8 will still be flowing 60lps (at 100% VE).

    ........

    I get slightly different numbers, but not enough to argue about. However, I am not too sure about the 100% volumetric efficiency - certainly every effort is made to get it as good as possible, but the fact that changes such as modifying valve timing can improve power output suggest it is not perfect. But I am quite willing to accept that the % is the same for both engines. My main point is that this analysis only applies if the petrol engine is operating at full throttle. How much of your driving is done at full throttle at any rpm?
    I suggest that any realistic driving profile will see the manifold pressure well below atmospheric most of the time. For example, in typical city driving, it will actually be idling for a significant part of the time, with the airflow heavily restricted by the throttle. In contrast, the diesel has no restriction to the throttle at any power setting, although at idling the boost will drop to nearly nothing. This means that the difference in air throughput is nowhere near as large as the displacement based figures suggest.

    Another effect will be that differences in flow resistance between different air cleaners will almost certainly be insignificant at any throttle setting except wide open, as the effect of the throttle will be much larger. On the other hand for a diesel, the restriction will have some effect at all times, although it is not clear whether it will have any significant effect except close to full throttle.

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Moruya Heads/Sth. Coast, NSW
    Posts
    6,532
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by isuzurover View Post
    Always the pedant aren't you John . An NA engine normally has near 100% volumetric efficiency at the peak of the torque curve (which is where you want to be driving it most of the time).

    For a 300Tdi that is 1800rpm. For a 3.9V8 that is 2500-3000rpm. If the V8 has 100% volumetric efficiency, and the TDI has 116% VE (boost is approx 16% of an atmosphere) - then my back of the envelope calcs say that the Tdi will be flowing about 45 lps, and the V8 85 lps (at 2500rpm). Even if you drop the revs to 1800, the V8 will still be flowing 60lps (at 100% VE).



    Slunnie - great line Funny you should say that - when I was running the tests using small particle sizes (on the K&N), I had to double check I was measuring on the correct side of the filter, as the concentration was hardly changing...
    I doubt very much that a 3.9 V8 or any other massed produced 4 cycle N.A. (petrol or diesel) engine will produce anywhere near 100% V.E. at any rev range, a good condition 4 cycle N.A. engine will produce about 75% V.E. on a good day, an extremely modified high performance N.A. 4 cycle engine would be hard pressed to get 100% V.E., Regards Frank.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    13,786
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Tank View Post
    I doubt very much that a 3.9 V8 or any other massed produced 4 cycle N.A. (petrol or diesel) engine will produce anywhere near 100% V.E. at any rev range, a good condition 4 cycle N.A. engine will produce about 75% V.E. on a good day, an extremely modified high performance N.A. 4 cycle engine would be hard pressed to get 100% V.E., Regards Frank.
    OK - I stand corrected.
    Generally, the RPM at peak VE coincides with the RPM at the torque peak. And generally, automotive engines rarely exceed 90% VE.
    http://www.epi-eng.com/ET-VolEff.htm

    However there is some conflicting (erroneous?) info out there:
    Note that most modern NA engines reach around 100 percent volumetric efficiency at the revs that they produce peak torque.
    http://www.autospeed.com/cms/A_2109/article.html


    However a 3.9 L petrol V8 at XX% VE (compared to a 2.5 L turbo diesel at XX*1.16% VE) will still be flowing more air.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    137
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I agree with the comment about the punched plate versus the open mesh reducing the flow area on the Coopers filter. I do respect Coopers products having used them for many years. An American geek some time ago did a Website featuring an oil filter analysis in which Coopers did very well. I think that Purolator came out top of the oil filter poll. Ryco scored extremely well too but Valvoline, as featured by our friends Super Cheese Auto came out close to a wad of toilet paper in his test. One might assume that filter manufacturers who make good oil filters most likely are OK at air filters as well.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW far north coast
    Posts
    17,285
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Dunnie View Post
    I agree with the comment about the punched plate versus the open mesh reducing the flow area on the Coopers filter. I do respect Coopers products having used them for many years. An American geek some time ago did a Website featuring an oil filter analysis in which Coopers did very well. I think that Purolator came out top of the oil filter poll. Ryco scored extremely well too but Valvoline, as featured by our friends Super Cheese Auto came out close to a wad of toilet paper in his test. One might assume that filter manufacturers who make good oil filters most likely are OK at air filters as well.
    Dunnie, did he actually use a bubble point tester ?
    or was it a visual analysis ?
    I've only ever seen one independent test using a bubble point tester, and Purolator did indeed do well.
    Having specs on some Ryco oil filters, they don't come anywhere near the US stuff in filtration efficiency (beta ratios) although their capacity before going into by-pass is greater (obviously)

    Also bear in mind that all manufacturers outsource a lot of their production, including the big boys like Donaldson and Cummins/Fleetguard. They just concentrate on their core lines.
    EG, my Donaldson oil filters are manufactured by Champion Laboratories in the US using Donaldson media, as are Fleetguards equivalent filter.
    Last edited by rick130; 9th October 2007 at 05:32 PM.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Warragul, Victoria
    Posts
    1,989
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Are K&N Filters really that bad?
    I was under the impression that if they were maintained properly they were really good.
    I'd love some constructive feedback.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    119
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Thumbs up

    Mucho interesting!
    Thanks Ben for sharing!

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    13,786
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Hymie View Post
    Are K&N Filters really that bad?
    I was under the impression that if they were maintained properly they were really good.
    I'd love some constructive feedback.
    Hymie - All will be revealed when I have finished analysing the efficiency measurements.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Moruya Heads/Sth. Coast, NSW
    Posts
    6,532
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Hymie View Post
    Are K&N Filters really that bad?
    I was under the impression that if they were maintained properly they were really good.
    I'd love some constructive feedback.
    Hymie, in some independent air filter tests it was noted that K&N air filters allowed 38% more dust (particles) into the engine than the standard OEM Paper Filter. I had a K&N air filter in my 03 Ford BA GT, it gave an increase of 6KW at the rear wheels when new, the engine was replaced at 25K because the rings had not bedded in and was using excessive oil, when the plenum was pulled down the amount of dirt and dust in and around the inlet horns was excessive, I have some pics if interested, moral of the story is there is always a trade off for extra performance, but it shouldn't be at the expense of dusting the engine, note: the K&N filter was not responsible for the ring problem, Regards Frank.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,029
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by isuzurover View Post
    ....and the TDI has 116% VE (boost is approx 16% of an atmosphere) - then my back of the envelope calcs say that the Tdi will be flowing about 45 lps, and the V8 85 lps (at 2500rpm). Even if you drop the revs to 1800, the V8 will still be flowing 60lps (at 100% VE).
    Ummm Ben.....

    A TDI runs at 1 bar boost..... That is 200% of the flow times the pumping efficency of the engine......

    Lets say 2.0 * 0.9 = 180%

    1.8 * 2.5 liter = equivalent to a 4.5 liter naturally asspirated engine as far as volumetric flow at the air filter. So somewhat higher than a 4 lieter petrol at the same revs. But they rev higher of course.

    edit:
    To add... To figure out air flow all you need to know is the pumping volume of the cylinders and the ACTUAL pressure during the intake stroke.... Plus or minus, the pressure losses from the air filter to the cylinders will be in the same ball park for these engines. The only difference is that the air is being compressed to get more in with the turbo. 15 psi boost is doubling the pressure.
    Last edited by Red90; 10th October 2007 at 04:31 AM.

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!