Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 21

Thread: Correct Length Shockies

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    74
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Correct Length Shockies

    Hi all,

    While I was shopping around for some shockies for my Disco, I rang around to get a 2" lift, new shocks and coils.

    I was surprised when I was told by a couple of vendors that for a 2" lift, my shock absorbers would be the standard height units, the coils are what gives the lift (of course) but the shocks remain the same.

    Does this seem right??? If so, the lift is really just the get more ground clearance, however you are not really getting any better droop or articulation form a 2" lift.

    this seemed strange to me, I mentioned to Blknight.aus as he is helping me with the installation, and it seemed strange to him too... so I would like to hear from the AULROians experts who may know about this topic.

    Thanks,

    Carlos

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    2,382
    Total Downloaded
    0
    you can get plus 2" shocks or just drop your mounts 2" by installing new turrets and shock droppers..
    Lifts are good for putting on bigger tyres which give you more under body clearance.. but to retain your articulation or droop you need longer shocks or drop the mounts...

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    74
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Well the idea for the lift is as you stated, bigger tyres, more clearance but also more droop as my belief is that
    more droop = greater chance of maintaining contact with the ground = better traction.

    Maybe I need to research other brands to see what they have to offer. At this stage I was looking at Rancho and TJM and when I called them they said standard units???

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Ellendale Tasmania.
    Posts
    12,986
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by wrex View Post
    Well the idea for the lift is as you stated, bigger tyres, more clearance but also more droop as my belief is that
    more droop = greater chance of maintaining contact with the ground = better traction.

    Maybe I need to research other brands to see what they have to offer. At this stage I was looking at Rancho and TJM and when I called them they said standard units???
    I'm pretty sure you have to have extended length shocks when lifting a Disco, well you do for a Disco 2.

    Baz.
    Cheers Baz.

    2011 Discovery 4 SE 2.7L
    1990 Perentie FFR EX Aust Army
    1967 Series IIa 109 (Farm Truck)
    2007 BMW R1200GS
    1979 BMW R80/7
    1983 BMW R100TIC Ex ACT Police
    1994 Yamaha XT225 Serow

  5. #5
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is online now RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,521
    Total Downloaded
    0
    While you can retain the same length shock absorbers with a lift, you lose in the amount of "droop" you can get. Ideally you need to lower the upper mounts by the same amount as the lift. But that is not the only consideration.

    The problem with just getting longer dampers, or lowering the upper mount, is that you also have to consider the closed length of them - is will not do them any good to be used as bump stops, so if you get longer shock absorbers or move the mount to allow the same amount of droop, you have to space the spring stops.

    So there are two figures that need to be considered.

    This is probably why the suppliers want to leave the shockers the same - it saves a lot of thinking and work.

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Travelling OZ - Back in SE Qld again at the moment
    Posts
    672
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Hi Wrex,

    Don't have any first-hand knowledge of the longer damper issue although your argument sounds right.

    But, IMHO, give Rancho a big swerve. Poorly constructed and as for the adjustable damping of the 9000X, my rear ones had to be on the max setting from day one to give any sort of reasonable performance.

    Have gone back to Bilsteins - excellent IMO.
    Ian &
    Leo - SIII 109/GMH3.3
    Daphne I - '97 Disco 300Tdi Manual
    Daphne II - '03 Disco Td5 Auto

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Ellendale Tasmania.
    Posts
    12,986
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Well this is my experience with standard length shocks and a 2" lift on my D2, first trip offroad the shocks were topping out, because they didn't have the travel for a 2" lift, i'm fairly sure the D1 is similar and needs longer travel shocks.

    Baz.
    Cheers Baz.

    2011 Discovery 4 SE 2.7L
    1990 Perentie FFR EX Aust Army
    1967 Series IIa 109 (Farm Truck)
    2007 BMW R1200GS
    1979 BMW R80/7
    1983 BMW R100TIC Ex ACT Police
    1994 Yamaha XT225 Serow

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Avoca Beach
    Posts
    14,152
    Total Downloaded
    0
    If you want to install longer shocks you have to consider a lot of things that Landrover did extensive testing on.
    1 you have to consider all operating conditions.Eg landing from a jump , how much does the bumpstop compress. In my experience it almost flattens so compresses maybe 20MM.
    2 What angle is placed on the rear ball joint at max articulation. Has it got the range?
    3 How long are the driveshafts? Will they fall out?
    4 how long are the springs? will they fall out?

    In general to be safe the shock mountings have to be FURTHER APART. Ie you should raise the front tower with a spacer or at the rear either lower the axle mount ( eg look at a Disco2) or raise the top, which is impossible with a non body lifted RRC or Disco1.

    ANY of these mods requires an Engineers report to be legal.
    So think carefully before you put longer shocks on, or you WILL face breakages on the trail.
    Just as an example I put new Boge standard shocks on my RRC. Then went to Bendethra and broke one rear shock off at the eye. When I checked carefully, I found that I had missed the inner tapered washer as it was dirty and added another. Just this tiny change caused a broken shock.
    Regards Philip A

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Kedron
    Posts
    189
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Here is my 2cents worth
    When you raise the vehicle the droop will remain the sam as it was befor the lift as the suspension travels in an arc and the fixed points of the arch have not changed only the starting point on the curve has been altered.
    If you change the pressure of your springs you will get more or less droope

    If you change a fixed pinto of the arc eg longer shocks the extra droop will be equal to the reduced amount of upward movement you will have. When you are crossed axled the extra droop on one side will be reduced by the limited upward movement on the other.

    The rear shocks are long enough to allow the coils to fall out with no issues with the tailshaft. Working on the front suspension is the challenge

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    74
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by PhilipA View Post
    1 you have to consider all operating conditions.Eg landing from a jump , how much does the bumpstop compress. In my experience it almost flattens so compresses maybe 20MM.
    2 What angle is placed on the rear ball joint at max articulation. Has it got the range?
    3 How long are the driveshafts? Will they fall out?
    4 how long are the springs? will they fall out?

    ANY of these mods requires an Engineers report to be legal.
    So think carefully before you put longer shocks on, or you WILL face breakages on the trail.
    Just as an example I put new Boge standard shocks on my RRC. Then went to Bendethra and broke one rear shock off at the eye. When I checked carefully, I found that I had missed the inner tapered washer as it was dirty and added another. Just this tiny change caused a broken shock.
    Regards Philip A
    So what you are saying is to stick to standard unless I start modifying other components.

    At this stage, higher ground clearance and bigger tyres will improve the Disco's abilities, however if by trying to get the extra 2'' of droop or wheel travel I have to start modifying other components, i might just leave it as it is for now.

    Quote Originally Posted by Leo109 View Post
    But, IMHO, give Rancho a big swerve. Poorly constructed and as for the adjustable damping of the 9000X, my rear ones had to be on the max setting from day one to give any sort of reasonable performance.
    I've read all the bad reports here, strangely enough, I had Ranchos on my Jeep and gave them a good workout and never had a problem so that's why I thought I try them. I guess if I go Rancho, I'll be the next one in here either bagging them or praising them...

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!