Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: AEU1828 CV are they used on Range Rovers?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East-South-East Girt-By-Sea
    Posts
    17,662
    Total Downloaded
    1.20 MB

    AEU1828 CV are they used on Range Rovers?

    Hi people

    I'm looking for some information on CV joints.

    Are the Rover Part "AEU1828" CV from the Series III Stage 1 also used on any of the clasic Range Rover classic models?

    I have been told they were the same as the ones on the early 2 doors.

    Diana

    You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    13,786
    Total Downloaded
    0
    NO.

    Most discos and rangies use stubless CVs - e.g. R606665 (early 2 door CVs)

    Countys have AEU 2522s - commonly regarded as the strongest rover CV (apart from 101cvs).
    Stage 1 Cvs are almost identical and just as strong - but I thought the PN was AEU1811????

    The RRC stubless CV (R606665) is very similar, except it has a female 10 spline instead of a stub shaft, which makes it 33% weaker - assuming the same stub axle material.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East-South-East Girt-By-Sea
    Posts
    17,662
    Total Downloaded
    1.20 MB
    Thanks IsuzuR..

    Don't have my books or even the Rave CD at work and don't actually have any Range Rover parts catalogues (shame on me).

    But I thought the 1828 number was the CV number and the other numbers related to the whole assembly with the long or short inner halfshaft. The inner halfshafts also have their own numbers.

    Will have another look when I get home.

    Diana

    You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    13,786
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Here is some info I posted AGES ago on outerlimits. You were right on the 1828!

    Quote Originally Posted by ISUZUROVER
    Plenty of info if you know where to look.

    Here are the 3 that Mal Story calles the "good" rover CV's

    R606665
    Early R/R & Disco CV joints (RR 1969-1987 (to VIN EA305589) - Disco 1989-1993) - 23 spline inner, 10 spline female outer (no stub axle)

    AEU1828
    Stage one S111 - 23 spline inner 24 spline outer stub

    AEU2522
    County and 200Tdi Defender - to axle #20L48865 1984-1994 - 23 spline inner 24 spline outer stub (same as AEU1828 but a slightly longer stub)


    And here are the crap ones... The info is a bit confusing for some of the later RR/Disco ones - can anyone clarify - LR may have multiple part numbers for the same CV.

    RTC6862
    300Tdi Defender (1993 - current) - crappy (tiny) 32 spline inner, 24 spline outer stub - from axle #20L48866

    RTC5843
    Later model S1 Disco (Non ABS - 1993 - ?) and RR (Non ABS - 1987-1989 (VIN EA305590 - JA624755))

    RTC6811
    Later model S1 Disco (ABS) and RR (ABS - 1987-1989) - with 10 spline outer

    TDJ000010 - possibly also STC 3051?
    Range Rover Classic 1992-end ABS Disco 1 - with 24 spline outer (I think).

    STC3204
    P38A Range Rover - don't know splines

    TDR100790
    S2 Disco - don't know splines

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East-South-East Girt-By-Sea
    Posts
    17,662
    Total Downloaded
    1.20 MB
    Thanks IsuzuR

    Clarifies my thinking and also the reason why people like Ashcroft's don't make replacements for the SIII Stage 1 CCs.

    (You know its interesting - in places where there were no SIII Isuzu's like South Africa it seems that some peole get confused when you talk about "Stage 1s". My guess is that they must refer to them as SIII V8s!)

    Diana

    You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.

  6. #6
    Davo is offline ChatterBox Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    2,595
    Total Downloaded
    0
    AEU1828
    Stage one S111 - 23 spline inner 24 spline outer stub

    AEU2522
    County and 200Tdi Defender - to axle #20L48865 1984-1994 - 23 spline inner 24 spline outer stub (same as AEU1828 but a slightly longer stub)
    Not to confuse things, but I asked a similar question elsewhere and was told that the County CVs are actually 5mm-10mm shorter than the Stage I CVs. Apparently you can use a County CV, (which is easier to get), in a Stage I, but because it's shorter you have to Loctite a bolt and washer in place to keep the CV from moving inward.

    I don't know for sure, though - I was just told that.

    Does anyone have a spare County CV they can measure? Because I've got some old Stage I CVs I can measure for comparison.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    13,786
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Davo View Post
    Not to confuse things, but I asked a similar question elsewhere and was told that the County CVs are actually 5mm-10mm shorter than the Stage I CVs. Apparently you can use a County CV, (which is easier to get), in a Stage I, but because it's shorter you have to Loctite a bolt and washer in place to keep the CV from moving inward.

    I don't know for sure, though - I was just told that.

    Does anyone have a spare County CV they can measure? Because I've got some old Stage I CVs I can measure for comparison.
    Davo - you are correct! That was posted many years ago, and that bit of info was mixed up.

    There is a thread on here showing pics of Stage 1 and 110 county CVs side by side. However - I wouldn't use the method you described, rather I would machine a few mm from the drive flanges, so you can fit the circlip. After all, if you can't get Stage 1 CVs, you won't be swapping back any time soon, and even if you do, you can fit a washer under the circlip!

  8. #8
    Davo is offline ChatterBox Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    2,595
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Okay, thanks for explaining that. That was my thought, too - just machine the drive flange down. You would lose some of the spline area, but I think you could machine some of the mating face and the inside of the flange as well.

    The other thing is I don't see why someone who makes CVs couldn't just make the shaft a little bit longer. It's all machined out of a big lump of steel anyway. If it's all CNC then it (I guess!) would only take a small change to the program.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!