Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: Headers/extractors for Range Rover

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    1,937
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Headers/extractors for Range Rover

    Thought I would ask this question because it never ceases to amaze me the amount of information some of you guys know.

    I am going to put new headers on the Rangie ute I am building as the old ones are looking a bit old and squashed.

    Does anyone know if the headers for a 3.5 or a 3.9 or a 4.6 V8 are diffent in tuning or size or is it more a matter of fitting them into the different chasis configurations?

    To make it hard, I am running a 4.6 block with 3.9 heads in a 3.5 chassis!! Just trying to work out whether buying headers for a 3.5 (because I know the shape will fit the chassis) will be more restrictive than if I bought 4.6 headers?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    56
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Walker

    I'm no expert on the topic but when my mate changed his engine he brought 3.9 extractors and had to change the gearbox cross member to a later model to get them to fit.

    adrian

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Prospect SA
    Posts
    2,131
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Walker

    No expert either but extractors on my 4.6 RRC a couple of years back did nothing for it at all bar some sound improvement.

    No performance gain, quite the opposite and cost a bomb, I went Mandrel bends of course and than stainless pipes, what a waste.
    Looked good though.

    Best of luck.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    1,937
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Yes, I wasnt expecting massive improvement, but it must make a difference. The exhaust manifold on the 3.5 and 3.9 is very very restrictive. But the biigest improvement is definately in the noise, much much better sound.

    Adrian, yes it was the crossmember that had me worried. I know the 3.5 headers are made to go under the frossmember, not sure what the later ones do. If they go over the top then it might be worth sourcing a later crossmember. From memory the later crossmembers were round, is this correct?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Colac foot of the otways
    Posts
    1,505
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Yeh i'm pretty sure they are round.Disco ones are round.I would just go the 3.9 headers.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    St Helena,Melbourne
    Posts
    16,770
    Total Downloaded
    1.13 MB
    I'm sure i read somewhere that the original 3.5/3.9 efi headers with 2 into 1 pipes were about as good as you'll get without going to a full tuned length system, i dont know of anyone he spent the $$$ and got an improvement they were happy about - seems like a waste of money to me unless you get them cheap or free. On my old 3.5 rangie the biggest improvement was made with some mild match porting of the inlet manifold/heads and slight opening up of the exhaust ports along with a single 2 1/2 " pipe with free flow centre muffler and hotdog on the rear using stock exhaust manifolds.
    MY08 TDV6 SE D3- permagrin ooh yeah
    2004 Jayco Freedom tin tent
    1998 Triumph Daytona T595
    1974 VW Kombi bus
    1958 Holden FC special sedan

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Prospect SA
    Posts
    2,131
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Agree with loanrangie.

    To do properly, do the cam, haltech or similar injection, some proting and polishing and than the exhaust.
    Ditch original, go mandrel bent where you can and try and get tuned for best flow and make sure there is sufficient back pressure.

    If too loud it can become annoying but the sound can be music to your ears also.

    Too much power can put extra strain on drive-train etc, so be careful cause the 4.6L is pretty good as it is.


    After mine was finished the 4wd dyno joint on south rd in SA tuned mtor for 107kw at the wheels.

    Car was awesome.

    I sold it because of never ending electrical gremlins that kept shorting stuff out.
    3 Times at auto electrician in one week.

    Moral of the story, Exhaust is only 1/4 of the story. Unless you just want to hear the howl of the pipe.

    Go for it.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    1,937
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Ok thanks all. I will go with the 3.5 headers then I dont have to worry about changing the crossmember. I already have a 2.5" exhaust with single free flow muffler.

    The Rangie is just a dedicated off-roader, so noise is not a problem. Only problem will be getting it passed with the engineer. It will be running on straight gas and I did do some porting and polished up the inlet manifold already. Cam is a towing cam cause I want low torque rather than high hp. Not sure what the headers and new Y pipe will cost but I am guessing maybe $500. I just want to get them on before I put the body back on the chassis.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Box Hill, Victoria
    Posts
    1,170
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Adam,
    Try Exhaust Fix in Croydon - heard really good things from mates with some pretty wild street cars.

    Cheers
    Dave.

  10. #10
    GuyG's Avatar
    GuyG is offline ChatterBox Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    2,001
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I've got extractors on my 3.9 (they came with the car) and then a 2.25 single straight through exhaust with free flow muffler and hot dog at the back. The exhaust goes over the gearbox crossmember - its round on a 1990 rangie. Being a ZF gearbox this makes it easier to complete a service if the exhaust doesn't have to be removed.
    98 Harvey the tractor - 300 tdi Defender Wagon
    84 Alfetta GTV

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!