Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 36

Thread: Engine/Trans options with Series Transfer

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Melbourn(ish)
    Posts
    26,497
    Total Downloaded
    0
    you should be able to get an early rover 3.5 v8 in there pushing the early c4 auto and mod the tcase and auto output shaft so they like each other. the lt77 should be a workable option as well.

    wouldnt want to do it without a sals in the rear and Id probabley want to mod a 6 gear front diff to run the series gearing.
    Dave

    "In a Landrover the other vehicle is your crumple zone."

    For spelling call Rogets, for mechanicing call me.

    Fozzy, 2.25D SIII Ex DCA Ute
    Tdi autoManual d1 (gave it to the Mupion)
    Archaeoptersix 1990 6x6 dual cab(This things staying)


    If you've benefited from one or more of my posts please remember, your taxes paid for my skill sets, I'm just trying to make sure you get your monies worth.
    If you think you're in front on the deal, pay it forwards.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Yinnar South, Vic
    Posts
    9,943
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Just stick the 250 in and turbo it already

  3. #13
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Dunedin, NZ ex-pat Scotland
    Posts
    76
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Blknight, really don't want an auto. That's the only drawback, and for the price of a Rover V8, it's not much more to go to a Lexus.

    Rovercare - What are the 250's like? I believe the engine is a counterflow and that straight away goes against my better judgement hahaa. But the thought had crossed my mind I won't lie.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Safety Bay
    Posts
    8,041
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Just on the series box strength,I had a 192 holden six with yella terra head,twin stromy's,an unknown cam,a mate had a 265 hemi and a third had a stock 250 crossflow and we didn't stuff a box.I had mine for three years but sold it as I wanted a LR not a holden.All of them were 2A's. Pat

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Yinnar South, Vic
    Posts
    9,943
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by barrangey View Post
    Blknight, really don't want an auto. That's the only drawback, and for the price of a Rover V8, it's not much more to go to a Lexus.

    Rovercare - What are the 250's like? I believe the engine is a counterflow and that straight away goes against my better judgement hahaa. But the thought had crossed my mind I won't lie.

    What? counterflow? you mean crossflow, right?, explain why it goes against you better jugement?............................

    250's be it pre crossflow or crossflow are solid, undersquare things that go fantastically with boost, very simple to do, with a J pipe of the original manifold......as a matter of fact their is a turbo 250 in the shed

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Yinnar South, Vic
    Posts
    9,943
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by PAT303 View Post
    Just on the series box strength,I had a 192 holden six with yella terra head,twin stromy's,an unknown cam,a mate had a 265 hemi and a third had a stock 250 crossflow and we didn't stuff a box.I had mine for three years but sold it as I wanted a LR not a holden.All of them were 2A's. Pat
    Yea, I know people who have run 35" Simex on stock diffs to, but there is only so long you can put off the inevitable......................Snap, crackle, pop

  7. #17
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Dunedin, NZ ex-pat Scotland
    Posts
    76
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Rovercare - Counterflow as in the exhaust and inlet are on the same side? Crossflow as in the opposite sides of head hence cross flow

    So they hendle boost well? Is the crossflow a better engine and does it share the same bellhousing bolt pattern?

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Yinnar South, Vic
    Posts
    9,943
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Ahh, that makes sense, just nobody ever referes to .............a counterflow head as a counterflow head

    Crossflow is definately better, merely for the sake of the head and is the same effectively in regards to the bottom end and bolt patterns etc

    3.2 3.9 4.0 Overhead cams are different though............would also be much better again, but why not utilise what you have?

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    14,145
    Total Downloaded
    99.87 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by barrangey View Post
    If I am honest it will be used off road but probably not ABUSED, a bit of river bed work and the likes but nothing major. I will also use it on the road for bombing about when I don;t want to use the Rangey. So 3.54 diffs would probably suit, and I doubt I will beak a Hilux box, and if I do, theres about 3 million around hahaha

    What Hilux box am I looking for though..... Toyotas are a black art to me.
    R150 or an R151 gearbox. Not the G52.

    I don't know a lot about these though. AFAIK the R151 was also used in the Landcruiser which has offset diffs unlike the Hilux, and the Landcruiser transfer is stronger (again AFAIK). I'm not sure what the packagine is like though. The LC is also setup to run 4.1 with31's standard.
    Cheers
    Slunnie


    ~ Discovery II Td5 ~ Discovery 3dr V8 ~ Series IIa 6cyl ute ~ Series II V8 ute ~

  10. #20
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Dunedin, NZ ex-pat Scotland
    Posts
    76
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Rovercare - that's fine, it's just what I have elways referred to them as. I don't have any engine right now, but is setup for 4.1 bellhousing. So crossflow is better, that is XD Falcon is it?

    Slunnie - Ah yes so LC is a better option again..... hmmmm harder to find though.

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!