Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 23 of 23

Thread: a bigger engine in a 101?

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by garrycol View Post
    I can ask on the UK 101 club site if you want me too.

    Garry
    Responses from the UK site:

    "Did it a few years ago. Best thing I have done to it, manifolds are a straight fit."

    "3.5 heads will fit, but you'll be short of the bottom four bolt holes in the block. The block itself is physically the same size as the 3.5 so fitting it won't be a problem. Personally I'd be more inclined to put some sort of efi on it, you'll be able to get more from the engine with electronic control than just using carbs."

    "what about using 4.6 block and heads, but putting a performance 3.9 cam, and 3.5 front cover and timing gear (you can use the 101 oil pump), the 101 manifolds will fit and put SUs on it"

    " It would be silly to downgrade to the original 3.5 101 oil pump! Stick with the better newer one! The 3.9 front cover and oil pump i fitted to mine keep the oil pressure loads better than the 3,5 one did."

    "Real Steel do a high capacity uprated pump for the Rover V8 for not too much money. Definitely worth doing that. Their Viper Cyclone cam works well too (got one in the RRC)."

    These are the comments so far - one of the posters who has done the conversion is happy to accept PM questions - so let me know if you want me to PM him with anything.

    Cheers

    Garry
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    sydney
    Posts
    142
    Total Downloaded
    0
    wow so much information !!!! you guys /gals are the best!!!
    well now i and sitting with a spinning head.. what to do..
    no i don't want to do 120 kmh but 40kmh is a bit slow...
    i would love to do "back to track " next year and to pull at leat a number 5
    over a few dunes.. so i am open to all good ideas
    again thanks you landy lot are so cool...

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Iain,

    Some more comments from the 101 club - now beginning to wander off topic but some points may still be of interest.

    "4.6 manifolds fit from stock without fettling? What's the rest of the exhaust system like/from to mate up to them?"

    " I think he means you use the standard 101 3.5 manifolds. Good ole mix and match of V8 bits."

    " Carbs and the like will bolt up onto a later engine without issue."

    " Yeah, stick with the 4.6 heads and just move the intake manifold and carbs over from the 3.5. If they are stromberg carbs however, you will have trouble running them on petrol. You really need SU's to be able to tune them enough for a bigger v8. Ive got a 3.9 in mine, which has the 3.5 intake and exhaust manifolds on."

    "If you are going to increase the engine's capacity you really ought to look into uprating the brakes too. They are only just about up to the job as it is!"

    If there are any more I will pass then on.

    Cheers

    Garry
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!