This is one discussing ACERT-http://ohe.cat.com/cda/components/fullArticle'm=116060&x=7&id=346759
 Fossicker
					
					
						Fossicker
					
					
                                        
					
					
						Yeh I hear ya re the position Dougal and this too has been the subject of discussion. You are dead correct in what you are saying to gain a true perspective of temps within the engine the probe needs to be pre turbo. To be honest mine is post along with many others just because most aftermarket dump pipes come with a bung prewelded and it is the old human trait of its easier to do there. In saying that I just work on the premise that if the egt gauge shows 550c post turbo it is time to take the foot off a bit. There has also been discussion of backing off at 600-650 post turbo and now in later contemplation this figure is too high for the little ZD30.
My opinion only of course there will be others who may take theirs to 600-650 but not moir. In relation to the research I did with egr many months ago. At the risk of sounding blase, just search the material from the United States and you will gain an insight. Most Universities have search engines regarding this but even then there are still fans and perhaps this is because of contributing factors of. Cost versus sales and the bottom line, I believe you discussed this anyway and are no doubt correct. My background was in earthmoving machinery and off road vehicle hire and I used keep abreast of developments and I guess I didnt really care in those days about longevity, just reliablity and cost effectiveness as we would just turn the gear over after the money was made and reliabilty became an issue but.............since now directly having to own a vehicle fiited with egr I became very interested in longevity. Hence why I dont like egr. But debatable none the less.
Dougal when you do the research, you may still agree with the concept and most certainly I respect that. Many others concur this in their research.There are authors who back it with their integrity. Mercedes, BMW.I ,mean the list is a whose who. It does the job........but I just think designers and engineers could come up with a better idea. Especially for the vehicles we love, because lets face it we have worked long and hard for them and it is in our interest to keep our 4bys fresh and willing. Let us know what you think because I have enjoyed the discussion as your points have merit,certainly from a cost aspect. Many Many multi billion dollar manufacturing companies utilise egr systems because they had to. Case point they didnt stop selling gear because of egr hey? We just learnt to live with it.
Last edited by maysy1; 17th September 2009 at 06:52 PM. Reason: typos
 Fossicker
					
					
						Fossicker
					
					
                                        
					
					
						This is one discussing ACERT-http://ohe.cat.com/cda/components/fullArticle'm=116060&x=7&id=346759
 Fossicker
					
					
						Fossicker
					
					
                                        
					
					
						 ForumSage
					
					
						ForumSage
					
					
                                        
					
					
						Thanks but I'd aleady found that article, it's dated 2003 which is almost prehistoric with the rate that diesel engine emission controls have beend developing.
EGR does have it's downsides, I'm not disputing that and I don't think anyone else does either. But it seems to be an unavoidable technology right now with no viable alternative. Basically it's the lesser of all the available evils. Intake throttling was used for a while, it's impact on fuel economy was far beyond anything EGR appears to do.
Needless to say, there are a lot of very smart people working on this problem every day worldwide, spending millions looking for a breakthrough. I'm keeping an ear to the ground to see what comes around.
But at the moment the use of particulate filters (soot traps) with cooled EGR can take the soot out of the equation. This is the #1 problem which owners report and Cat reference in that article you linked in above.
 Fossicker
					
					
						Fossicker
					
					
                                        
					
					
						HA HA yeh I guess 2003 is along time ago in engineering terms. Things move quick thats for sure. But tell me guys how is the egr system plumbed on the later defenders say after 2004?
Is there a thread on here re the question?
2004-early 2007 they used the system on the TD5 because well they have the td5.
you have a dedicated port on the front of the exhaust manifold that ports the gass in to a tube (and also a cooler on the MY03 spec) to the controlling valve mounted between the outlet of the intercooler and the intake manifold.
pre my03 its just a valve and post my03 its a valve and a butterfly. this is all vacuum operated and computer controlled.
Dave
"In a Landrover the other vehicle is your crumple zone."
For spelling call Rogets, for mechanicing call me.
Fozzy, 2.25D SIII Ex DCA Ute
TdiautoManual d1 (gave it to the Mupion)
Archaeoptersix 1990 6x6 dual cab(This things staying)
If you've benefited from one or more of my posts please remember, your taxes paid for my skill sets, I'm just trying to make sure you get your monies worth.
If you think you're in front on the deal, pay it forwards.
i just want an EGR kit because it keeps less **** out of my intlet manifold...
i cleaned the inlet manifold today and it was shockingly filthy... did the intercooler and pipes too.
i know how it works, but its 100% for maintenance side of things.
oooh wow, this is an old thread... haha
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! | Search All the Web! | 
|---|
|  |  | 
Bookmarks