No.Quote:
Originally Posted by cal415
Printable View
No.Quote:
Originally Posted by cal415
hey grimace, i know where theres a 8L v10 viper motor and 4L60e for 8k if you want to push your budget? they are all alloy too.
Andy
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dougal
Yep , well , I 've got one of those 50hp engines in my rover and it went no where near as far as the 4.6 petrol engines went on the dunes :p
A standard 4BD1T puts out 86 kw/320 Nm at 3000 rpm and 1800 rpm respectively. A standard 3-53T industrial engine has output of 98 kw/423 Nm at 2500 rpm and 1600 rpm respectively. The little Detroit should have considerably more torque at clutch engagement, 800 rpm. This is a characteristic of Detroit two stroke diesels. The 4BD1T weighs 340 kgs. and according to Joe Hawkes, the little aluminium Detroit weighs not much over 200 kgs. Main problem would appear to be driveline strength in using the Detroit in a Land Rover.
Sounds like an interesting motor, are they hard to come by and very costly?
As for the driveline, i think a rat in a wheel used as a motor would probobly put stress on the stock rover driveline :)
Those are industrial engine specs (86/320).Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Hjelm
My JDM 4BD1T was 103kw and 330Nm stock.
The stock fuel pump delivers enough to double those figures. Just needs more boost.
The BSFC figures show the detroit using around 20% more fuel than the average tdi (like the 4BD1T) to do the same job.
So fuel consumption would be on par with a nissan 4.2 diesel.
Those figures for the 4BD1T were taken from the Land Rover 110 Australian Supplement, what was fitted to the 6 x 6.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dougal
My experience with Detroits, mostly 8V92TA's at 435 hp was that they use about the same fuel as any comparable truck doing the same job. I had one out, (unapproved modification) at marine spec 545 hp @ 2300 pulling triples, gross >90 tonnes, that was a bit thirsty. But if you are not fed you won't work either. Detroits do the work easy and just about forever if you keep clean filters up to them. DDA had an oil analysis programme that would tell you if you needed to change oil. They maintained that changing oil for the sake of it was unecessary expense, "Change it when we tell you". They had a very low cost per mile due to low maintenance and longevity.
Yes, the standard landy fitment was an industrial motor. The truck motors have a higher state of tune.Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Hjelm
What exactly does a 3 cyl detroit sound like? I have a mental soundtrack which is a cross between a perkins 3 cyl tractor engine and an electric hair-dryer.
I agree on un-necessary oil changes.
As Dougal said. Landie engines were the industrial 4BD1/T.
The civvie 110s had an uprated pump for more power - 99Bhp IRC compared to 85 for the stage1s and perenties. Not sure what the civvie 6x6s had, but as there were only a few sold it is a moot point.
Here is some good info on the 3/4-53T:
[ame=http://www.4btswaps.com/forum/showthread.php't=7622]Swap questions; 3-53T or 4-53T in an F150 - Cummins 4BT & Diesel Conversions Forums[/ame]
I must admit the 4-53T sounds good:
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2aANhxdnIN0"]YouTube - First test of a 4-53 Detroit Diesel in a 1956 Ford F100[/ame]
3-53T - hard to hear the engine over the screaming though:
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cAJQhmvGLtI"]YouTube - 353T Detroit Diesel Pull[/ame]
All the diesel arguements, and hidden amongst them is this little gem!
Tell me more about the combo and how much for the motor alone.Quote:
Originally Posted by andrew e
Have since learnt that the 4l60 is to be replaced with a 4l80 as marks has a adaptor kit to suit the LT230 tcase and the 4l60 wont work with my configuration.