Australian Land Rover Owners

Gallery Donate Calendar Markets Shop Subscribe! Files Links
Go Back   Australian Land Rover Owners > >

Notices

Technical Chatter Tips, Tricks, and Technocrats

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11th September 2009, 08:11 AM
Grimace's Avatar
Grimace Grimace is offline
YarnMaster
Silver Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Gold Coast, QLD
Posts: 3,556
ENGINE TRANSPLANT???

FIRSTLY I JUST WANT TO SAY THAT THIS IS JUST AN IDEA AND I WOULD LIKE OTHERS OPINIONS. I HOPE THIS DOESNT BREAK ANY FORUM RULES?

After speaking with me mechanic and mates about Fluffys heart, the idea of a engine transplant is playing on my mind. I propose the following two options.

Option 1;
ENGINE - Rover 3.9-5.2L Fit cam kit, injectors, stage three heads, re ring or possible stroker.
PROS - more power, lightweight, that rover V8 exhaust note.
CONS - auto wont handle it, cost/power ratio in comparison to option 2
COST - $5000-7000 depending on final capacity.

Option 2;
ENGINE - 6L L76 or L98 (with 4spd auto). Mild cam and mafless tune.
PROS - even more power, new engine, reliability, cost/power ratio, plenty of future upgrade potential, better fuel economy, good strong auto. Can also sell the rover engine, auto, cam kit, ecu etc etc.
CONS - Exhaust note, weight, diffs might not like me much! Not a rover.
COST - $7000-$8000 (minus what I get back from all the rover drivetrain)

Currently pricing up to see if the price can be improved and to get a good idea of the actual engine availability. I really wanted to stick with the rover V8 but the 6L of absolute power house is a very hard to pass up/ignore.

The fact that I know of others with the same engine in large 4wds getting constant town figures of 16L per hundred. Also having owned a L76 powered ute, I know the power these engine can deliver and the fuel economy that comes along with it (ute averaged 13L/100).

So the idea is in the air, will start compiling a complete costing and will post up when I have the final figures.
------------------------------------------------------------

Cheers
Grimace
__________________
I rule!!!

2.4" of Pure FURY!!!

Last edited by abaddonxi; 11th September 2009 at 08:27 AM. Reason: Advertising.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 11th September 2009, 11:42 AM
big guy's Avatar
big guy big guy is offline
ChatterBox
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Prospect SA
Posts: 2,137
Hmm

I do believe TRS are doing a full recon or exchange motor for $4950 and its a 4.9L.

A long motor at that from my last speaking with them.
They are pretty reputable.
You can also include a Haltech computer for some extra beans.

Comes in with labour at your budget above.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11th September 2009, 12:04 PM
Grimace's Avatar
Grimace Grimace is offline
YarnMaster
Silver Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Gold Coast, QLD
Posts: 3,556
Quote:
Originally Posted by big guy View Post
Hmm

I do believe TRS are doing a full recon or exchange motor for $4950 and its a 4.9L.

A long motor at that from my last speaking with them.
They are pretty reputable.
You can also include a Haltech computer for some extra beans.

Comes in with labour at your budget above.
Will be ringing Chris @ RPi tonight to discuss their engine options
__________________
I rule!!!

2.4" of Pure FURY!!!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11th September 2009, 12:08 PM
cal415's Avatar
cal415 cal415 is offline
ChatterBox
Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Stockton, NSW
Posts: 2,756
Do the Chev motor, they sit nicely in the rover
__________________

Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #5  
Old 11th September 2009, 12:10 PM
Camo's Avatar
Camo Camo is offline
Wizard
Silver Subscriber
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gold Coast
Posts: 1,423
Yep chev..can't beat em

they are the same weight yeah?
__________________
2004 Black Range Rover L322 Diesel
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11th September 2009, 12:32 PM
Grimace's Avatar
Grimace Grimace is offline
YarnMaster
Silver Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Gold Coast, QLD
Posts: 3,556
Quote:
Originally Posted by cal415 View Post
Do the Chev motor, they sit nicely in the rover
There is no way i will be putting an old chev motor in my classic, too heavy.

The new Gen4s are not too bad.
__________________
I rule!!!

2.4" of Pure FURY!!!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11th September 2009, 01:52 PM
Disco_owner's Avatar
Disco_owner Disco_owner is offline
YarnMaster
Supporter
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: NSW , Pennant Hills
Posts: 3,467
Quote:
Originally Posted by cal415 View Post
Do the Chev motor, they sit nicely in the rover

^ x 2

Chev with GQ gear Box mated to an LT230.

oops I just saw your post above ... ignore my post then
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11th September 2009, 02:19 PM
Hoges Hoges is offline
YarnMaster
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 3,051
FWIW: (prob not much!) there was a 4wd racer @ gold coast who recently entered a modified Pajero in the Alice Sp. to Finke race in the NT. According to the write up in the local rag, his mechanics ditched the UK spec/prepared engine etc and put in a "crated" GM LS something... 6L I recall together with a 5 sp GM auto gearbox... came as a unit complete with all ECUs etc etc ...didn't hear how he went (I expect very fast )

It shouldn't be too long before said "crated" GM engines are available with variable cylinder management currently offered with the latest Holden V8s... now that would be a great leap forward!

As regards "what is a rover" ... I have no doubt that given the right price the GM LS series may have been in the LR well before this... like BMW donks in Rolls Royces, GM Holden (Fishermen's Bend produced ) 4 cyl engines exported for use in Saabs and Alfas a few years ago....

Last edited by Hoges; 11th September 2009 at 02:20 PM. Reason: typo
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11th September 2009, 03:24 PM
cal415's Avatar
cal415 cal415 is offline
ChatterBox
Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Stockton, NSW
Posts: 2,756
Yeh i didnt mean the old school chev, i meant the alloy block LS motor.... but i guess were talking holden motors there
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11th September 2009, 03:26 PM
TheLowRanger's Avatar
TheLowRanger TheLowRanger is offline
Master
Supporter
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Albany WA
Posts: 237
I am interested to see what becomes of this thread as it is on my future radar to possibly try one of these options myself. I do like the idea of the LS engines because of what you say, better fuel economy and more power to boot.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!

All times are GMT +10. The time now is 03:58 AM.



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Feedback Buttons provided by Advanced Post Thanks / Like v3.6.3 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
AULRO.com
Copyright 2001 - 2016
Independently Owned and Operated by
Dave Blears Computing - DavecandoIT -AULRO.com
LAND ROVER and its logo are the registered trademarks of Land Rover.
Land Rover is not affiliated with AULRO.com.