Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 25

Thread: Britpart/Wolf RAI on 4BD1-T

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East-South-East Girt-By-Sea
    Posts
    17,662
    Total Downloaded
    1.20 MB

    Britpart/Wolf RAI on 4BD1-T

    Today Ben suggested that a disco snorkel would be too small on a 4BD1-T.

    Out of interest, I have a Britpart raised air intake of the type that are used on the British Army Defender Wolf that I bought to use on a Rover 6 cyl in a Series.



    Would it also be too small to use on a Defender with a 4BD1-T?

    You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Melbourn(ish)
    Posts
    26,495
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Lotz-A-Landies View Post
    Today Ben suggested that a disco snorkel would be too small on a 4BD1-T.

    Out of interest, I have a Britpart raised air intake of the type that are used on the British Army Defender Wolf that I bought to use on a Rover 6 cyl in a Series.



    Would it also be too small to use on a Defender with a 4BD1-T?
    nope you'll be fine, so long as the intake diameter is larger than the throat on the turbo or any restriction after the airfilter its not going to be the choke point.
    Dave

    "In a Landrover the other vehicle is your crumple zone."

    For spelling call Rogets, for mechanicing call me.

    Fozzy, 2.25D SIII Ex DCA Ute
    Tdi autoManual d1 (gave it to the Mupion)
    Archaeoptersix 1990 6x6 dual cab(This things staying)


    If you've benefited from one or more of my posts please remember, your taxes paid for my skill sets, I'm just trying to make sure you get your monies worth.
    If you think you're in front on the deal, pay it forwards.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    13,786
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Lotz-A-Landies View Post
    Today Ben suggested that a disco snorkel would be too small on a 4BD1-T.

    Out of interest, I have a Britpart raised air intake of the type that are used on the British Army Defender Wolf that I bought to use on a Rover 6 cyl in a Series.



    Would it also be too small to use on a Defender with a 4BD1-T?
    The Wolfs are TD5s aren't they???

    TD5s flow a lot of air - similar to a 4BD1T, so if designed correctly it will be OK, however I have never liked the look of those snorkels from a fluid dynmics perspective. It also looks like the design is the same as the 300?

    Pressure drop in a pipe (turbulent regime) is proportional to V^2/D (*Length, with additional losses for each bend and change in diameter). V= velocity, D= diameter.

    If a snorkel is not large enough then it will impede highway performance. As you can see from the above relationship, increasing diameter makes a big difference - as it changes both V and D for the better.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    1,545
    Total Downloaded
    0

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Geelong, VIC
    Posts
    4,442
    Total Downloaded
    0
    If there was an "ugly" variable in the pressure drop formula it would definitely be too restrictive. It looks a lot like the sewer pipe that runs down the wall of my house

    I've got a mandrel bent stainless snorkel with a standard type Donaldson snorkel head on it, connected to my air filter housing with approx 60cm of that wire reinforced corrugated ducting. Snorkel, ducting, and inlet into the air filter are all 75mm diam.

    I ran without the snorkel for a few months, and never had the filter restriction indicator pop on me, but since I fitted the snorkel it pops as soon as it gets a decent run, so the snorkel and ducting are definitely creating a restriction. Hopefully in my case its the ducting that's causing most of it, since that would be easy to improve.

    I guess the question is how much restriction is too much? Is there a guideline for recommended maximum pressure drop that we can measure and compare to?

    Steve

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    13,786
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by steveG View Post
    ...
    I guess the question is how much restriction is too much? Is there a guideline for recommended maximum pressure drop that we can measure and compare to?

    Steve
    Any intake restriction on a diesel will result in less power and increased fuel consumption.

    How much you are willing to live with to ensure clean air (and no water) getting to your engine is another matter. Personally I would not run the snorkel in Diana's pic. I suspect they have not been designed by anyone who understands fluid dynamics (and/or were designed for the na2.5, and have not been upgraded).

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East-South-East Girt-By-Sea
    Posts
    17,662
    Total Downloaded
    1.20 MB
    OK, Ben has set a home work assignment, so I'm guessing I need to check the airflow inputs.

    Going by rolling radius X 3.54 diffs X 2.11 transfer and 5th gear @100KPH I'm calculating approx 4.4K litres/min on a NA 4BD1 engine. Are those parameters O.K.?

    What is the difference (increase) in airflow with an OEM turbo?

    You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Geelong, VIC
    Posts
    4,442
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Lotz-A-Landies View Post
    OK, Ben has set a home work assignment, so I'm guessing I need to check the airflow inputs.

    Going by rolling radius X 3.54 diffs X 2.11 transfer and 5th gear @100KPH I'm calculating approx 4.4K litres/min on a NA 4BD1 engine. Are those parameters O.K.?

    What is the difference (increase) in airflow with an OEM turbo?
    Some good info from Donaldson here on airflow requirements (on the first page): http://www.donaldson.com/en/engine/s...ary/056798.pdf

    Basically double the NA airflow for turbo/intercooled.

    Steve

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    13,786
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Lotz-A-Landies View Post
    OK, Ben has set a home work assignment, so I'm guessing I need to check the airflow inputs.

    Going by rolling radius X 3.54 diffs X 2.11 transfer and 5th gear @100KPH I'm calculating approx 4.4K litres/min on a NA 4BD1 engine. Are those parameters O.K.?

    What is the difference (increase) in airflow with an OEM turbo?
    Intake Airflow (CFM) = (engine size (CID)*rpm/3456)*VE

    VE for a properly set up 4BD1T = ~2

    So that gives you almost 500 CFM at 3500 rpm.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East-South-East Girt-By-Sea
    Posts
    17,662
    Total Downloaded
    1.20 MB
    Thanks Ben, as usual I seem to be working in the wrong standard. Serves me right wanting to use metric! (You should have seen me working in the Delivery Suite - we weighed and recorded the baby in Kg and I would always add an error in the conversion to pounds, the next midwife would convert with the table. That way the parents would always be confused what their baby weighed in lbs but the Kg would be correct.)

    Just one Q. Why are you using the RPM at 3.5K? Is that the max RPM of the engine? (My calc had the engine RPM less than 3K in 5th at 100KPH.)

    You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!