Thread: Isuzu gearbox ratios

Originally Posted by Jesse.s

by the way Kevin at rovertech in Perth said he knows a guy in QLD that dose a relay nice Isuzu gearbox modifications for land rovers iv been meaning to ring him back and ask more about it but i haven't got round to it yet as im not realy in the market for a new transmission. but ill post it up here if i fined out what the mod is.
or give him a call and pick his brains if your relay keen to hear about it

Sheldon no longer does that conversion, you may have missed the boat.

As for your lt230, last lt85/230 combo i got my hands on had a 1.192 transfercase.

Originally Posted by Vern

Sheldon no longer does that conversion, you may have missed the boat.

As for your lt230, last lt85/230 combo i got my hands on had a 1.192 transfercase.

What was it like? did the 1..192 feel like a petty short ratio? I can't seem to fined what ratio mine is. Can you fined out looking at the serial number? Screenshot_2020-08-15-17-50-10.jpg

Originally Posted by Vern

Sheldon no longer does that conversion, you may have missed the boat.

As for your lt230, last lt85/230 combo i got my hands on had a 1.192 transfercase.

I'm pretty shore mine is 1.222... dos higher number equate to lower ratio? Excuse me if that's an ignorant question

Something like this? Isuzu (MYY5T) gearbox to LT230. I don't know how the length of my adapter compares to the std gearbox/transfer combo length? Mine is going in to a Series Forward Control so I am unencumbered by floor pan or bulkhead. Not fitted yet. Still rebuilding the 4JH1 motor to go in front of it.

Originally Posted by Jesse.s

What was it like? did the 1..192 feel like a petty short ratio? I can't seem to fined what ratio mine is. Can you fined out looking at the serial number? Screenshot_2020-08-15-17-50-10.jpg

Yes its a 1.222
Ashcroft Transmissions

Originally Posted by Jesse.s

What was it like? did the 1..192 feel like a petty short ratio? I can't seem to fined what ratio mine is. Can you fined out looking at the serial number? Screenshot_2020-08-15-17-50-10.jpg

That is a 1.211 box, newer style fine gear.

edit: Yes, 1.222. I thought the suffix was G, but it is C. Not original. Those were 29D = 1.192

Originally Posted by Red90

That is a 1.211 box, newer style fine gear.

edit: Yes, 1.222. I thought the suffix was G, but it is C. Not original. Those were 29D = 1.192

Is the 1.192 higher ratio then 1.222?

Originally Posted by Red90

That is a 1.211 box, newer style fine gear.

edit: Yes, 1.222. I thought the suffix was G, but it is C. Not original. Those were 29D = 1.192

Is the 1.192 higher ratio then 1.222?