Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 27

Thread: Pro's and Con's of Turboing A N/A 4BD1

  1. #1
    lokka Guest

    Pro's and Con's of Turboing A N/A 4BD1

    Ok guys ive heard all sorts of storys on this subject and would like to know what the owners of 4bd1's have to say about turboing a N/A 4bd1

    I knnow theres huge bennifits on fitting a turbo to a deso id just like to know what others think i have a 4bd1 with only 150 k on it and would like to fit it to a rangie with a turbo and intercooler either air to air or water to air ..

    I dont want to run huge boost just the right amount to suite the set up i use i know im not going to get the same HP figures of a V8 but i also wont have the drinking habbit of one ....

    Im planing on running the original LT95 which came with the doner stage1 the engin came from and std raito's in the diffs and a set of 33in tyres as ive read on other threads on here that this type of combo is about the best set up what do others think ...

    Cheers

    Chris

  2. #2
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is offline RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,519
    Total Downloaded
    0
    The 4BD1 actually produces near enough to the same power as does the V8 in the form used in the Stage 1 and 110! And a lot better torque figures. But nothing like the power of the V8 in other applications. Turbocharging the engine is a simple and relatively inexpensive way of increasing power substantially with little increase in mass. The downside is that (without incorporating the differences in the -T version, which brings in a whole new dimmension of cost and complication) you are using up some of the admittedly ample durability and safety margins (how much depends on how much boost you use!), and have all the maintenance problems of running a non-standard engine - but you are doing this anyway in putting it in a Rangerover.
    A number of people here have run turboed 4BD1s without reporting problems, although some have cautioned that you should keep an eye on exhaust temperatures.

    As a different option - have you considered diesel gas? This involves less change to the engine installation for similar power increases, but as combustion efficiency is increased stress on the engine is likely to be less for the same power, and the cost is probably around the same. Downside is you have to find somewhere to put the tank(s).

    John
    Last edited by JDNSW; 4th September 2007 at 07:44 AM. Reason: spelling
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Brisbane, Inner East.
    Posts
    11,178
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Given that motor manufacturing is a cost concious business, and manufacturers generally don't do radical modifications for the sheer sake of change, I suggest that the considerable differences between the naturally aspirated and pressurised versions of the 4B & 6B series Isuzus are necessary from the points of durability, reliability, and performance. An engine man very familiar with the engine family tells me that there are barely two parts the same when comparing the two systems.
    URSUSMAJOR

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Darwin
    Posts
    462
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Brian Hjelm View Post
    Given that motor manufacturing is a cost concious business, and manufacturers generally don't do radical modifications for the sheer sake of change, I suggest that the considerable differences between the naturally aspirated and pressurised versions of the 4B & 6B series Isuzus are necessary from the points of durability, reliability, and performance. An engine man very familiar with the engine family tells me that there are barely two parts the same when comparing the two systems.
    Very true

    Without sounding like too much of a hipocrite, mine seems to have handled the turbo alright. But you do feel a very flat area due to not having the right cam.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Singapore via Melbourne
    Posts
    1,938
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Larns View Post
    Very true

    Without sounding like too much of a hipocrite, mine seems to have handled the turbo alright. But you do feel a very flat area due to not having the right cam.
    I don't disagree, however don't forget the 4BD1 was never intended for running a little truck like a 110 - it was engineered and built for moving fully laden trucks...


    my turboed formerly N/A motor aint missed a beat thus far...

  6. #6
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is offline RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,519
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by EchiDna View Post
    I don't disagree, however don't forget the 4BD1 was never intended for running a little truck like a 110 - it was engineered and built for moving fully laden trucks...


    my turboed formerly N/A motor aint missed a beat thus far...
    It was designed for moving heavily laden trucks - but on reasonable roads at reasonable speeds, where there is a bit of air cooling for example. I doubt the extreme service in a truck, pulling hard in hot weather in hilly country is any harder on the engine than in a Landrover overloaded with expedition gear pulling hard all day in second gear through sandhills with an air temperature over forty. But if it spends its days commuting on freeways, or even driving to the shops, then the Landrover installation will have an easier life.

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Singapore via Melbourne
    Posts
    1,938
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by JDNSW View Post
    It was designed for moving heavily laden trucks - but on reasonable roads at reasonable speeds, where there is a bit of air cooling for example. I doubt the extreme service in a truck, pulling hard in hot weather in hilly country is any harder on the engine than in a Landrover overloaded with expedition gear pulling hard all day in second gear through sandhills with an air temperature over forty. But if it spends its days commuting on freeways, or even driving to the shops, then the Landrover installation will have an easier life.

    John
    you are right JD, but just to split hairs further - the frequency with which you do those sandhill trips in 40+ degree heat also comes into the equation... most will do that kind of extended trip 1-2 times a year at most, so the hard work for the motor would occur in that time period of (lets say) 8-10 weeks a year, or 20% of the time... even if the wear is accelearated to 5 x normal levels, it's still gonna be a long time between rebuilds!

  8. #8
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is offline RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,519
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by EchiDna View Post
    you are right JD, but just to split hairs further - the frequency with which you do those sandhill trips in 40+ degree heat also comes into the equation... most will do that kind of extended trip 1-2 times a year at most, so the hard work for the motor would occur in that time period of (lets say) 8-10 weeks a year, or 20% of the time... even if the wear is accelearated to 5 x normal levels, it's still gonna be a long time between rebuilds!
    The downside is likely to be not increased wear, but the increased probability of failures such as melted pistons on that once a year trip. Remember that the turbo version has oil jets onto the pistons, not to reduce wear, but to keep piston temperatures down. But of course, the probability of this sort of problem is very much dependent on how much extra boost you give it, and how much you use the extra available power. A mild boost is unlikely to give any problems. Same as "chipping" a Td5.

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Yinnar South, Vic
    Posts
    9,943
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by JDNSW View Post
    The downside is likely to be not increased wear, but the increased probability of failures such as melted pistons on that once a year trip. Remember that the turbo version has oil jets onto the pistons, not to reduce wear, but to keep piston temperatures down. But of course, the probability of this sort of problem is very much dependent on how much extra boost you give it, and how much you use the extra available power. A mild boost is unlikely to give any problems. Same as "chipping" a Td5.

    John
    Doesn't have a lot to do with the boost really, its how much fuel you tip in with the boost

  10. #10
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is offline RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,519
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by rovercare View Post
    Doesn't have a lot to do with the boost really, its how much fuel you tip in with the boost
    Well, yes. The piston temperature will depend largely on how much fuel is burnt, but will generally be higher with higher intake pressure, simply because the fuel is burnt more effectively. And since the whole idea of pressurising the engine is to increase the power, as a general rule the maximum fuel delivery WILL be increased. But as you are pointing out, the problems will only arise when you actually use the increased power.

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!