Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 36

Thread: 200tdi or 3.9 Isuzu......

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Central Coast NSW
    Posts
    1,103
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Furthermore and plus.....

    200tdi (2.5lt) dragging 2+ tonnes of whatever has a much harder life than a 4BD1 (3.9lt).........

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Singapore via Melbourne
    Posts
    1,938
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Taz View Post
    Hang on a minute, I thought Tdi's had slightly more power and torque than 4BD1's. 4BD1T's are a different story!
    okay okay... I guess I should have said 'usable torque' or torque where you need it

    anyways, the other fellas have given you the G.O. on why the 4BD1 beats the TDI...

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Piggabeen (Tweed Heads)
    Posts
    2,930
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Isuzu

    Why would you want a woosy 200tdi that sounds like a Peugoet (did I spell that right) when you can have an engine that sounds like your local fruit truck

    Justin

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    503
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Gents,

    Crikey - enough of the usuable torque gumf already. There is a device you can use to exploit the torque of even the most narrow of torque ranges - it's called a gear box and a manual Tdi has 10 gears.

    I believe your application (what you do with it) drives your belief of which engine is best. I am very happy with my Tdi and I would not prefer an isuzu for what I do. And I'm sure there are many good people who prefer the isuzu over the Tdi. And I think thats great. There are no winners and loosers, both are great engines.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Kingston, Tassie, OZ.
    Posts
    13,728
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Taz View Post
    Gents,

    Crikey - enough of the usuable torque gumf already. There is a device you can use to exploit the torque of even the most narrow of torque ranges - it's called a gear box and a manual Tdi has 10 gears.

    I believe your application (what you do with it) drives your belief of which engine is best. I am very happy with my Tdi and I would not prefer an isuzu for what I do. And I'm sure there are many good people who prefer the isuzu over the Tdi. And I think thats great. There are no winners and loosers, both are great engines.
    Good one Taz,

    I work on all these engines, and If i was towing a 3.5 ton boat, it'd be the Isuzu no question. If I was touring outback and needed some big payload and ruggedness with good fuel economy and reliability, a 300Tdi 130CC. If I was doing lots of road miles and spent a good deal of time driving, and didn't need heaps of space and carrying stuff etc, a D2 Td5 with a chip would be the bees knees- comfort and performance.

    It s all about your needs , they'll all do the job

    JC
    The Isuzu 110. Solid and as dependable as a rock, coming soon with auto box😊
    The Range Rover L322 4.4.TTDV8 ....probably won't bother with the remap..😈

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Dayboro, Qld
    Posts
    2,968
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Thanks for all the advice and tips, I'm hoping to pick up the new toy in about a week. I'll post some pics etc then.
    I've owned a 200tdi, aTD5 dual cab, a Series IIa Dormobile with a Perkins Diesel fitted, and at the moment a Series IIa SWB which is being sold to help fund the new one.
    It will be interesting to see how it compares to the above.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Cessnock NSW
    Posts
    1,506
    Total Downloaded
    0

    hello i am new to this site but just thought i would add my opinion

    i own a 1994 200tdi and must say that it is a way better car to drive than the 1986 3.9 isuzu that is in the family as well , it might have to do with age difference but everything in the tdi is much more user friendly ie: gearbox,steering,comfort etc etc my 200tdi has done just under 230,000k's and feels like it is almost brand new (not sloppy) but i can also say the isuzu has been a good old truck as well but if your looking for somthing with a bit more power look along the lines of the latest 300tdi my old man has a 1998 300tdi and it goes like a rocket compared to the 200 and the isuzu and is also very quiet . after saying that i am looking at in the not to distant future overhauling the old isuzu and i was wondering would anyone hav any sugestions in upgrading performance ?


    anyways cheers!

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Kiwiland
    Posts
    7,246
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by c.h.i.e.f View Post
    i own a 1994 200tdi and must say that it is a way better car to drive than the 1986 3.9 isuzu that is in the family as well , it might have to do with age difference but everything in the tdi is much more user friendly ie: gearbox,steering,comfort etc etc my 200tdi has done just under 230,000k's and feels like it is almost brand new (not sloppy) but i can also say the isuzu has been a good old truck as well but if your looking for somthing with a bit more power look along the lines of the latest 300tdi my old man has a 1998 300tdi and it goes like a rocket compared to the 200 and the isuzu and is also very quiet . after saying that i am looking at in the not to distant future overhauling the old isuzu and i was wondering would anyone hav any sugestions in upgrading performance ?


    anyways cheers!
    Is that old Isuzu non-turbo? If so there's a very obvious upgrade that'll make the 300tdi feel like a slug.

  9. #19
    Rangier Rover Guest
    Have just got home with the 4BD1 120. Was a bit nervous jumping in a 19 yr old Land Rover that I didn't know for a 3&1/2 hour trip in the dark. We made it. Just posting this as I noticed on a long hill did not pull well as should with Turbo on it. It pulls well through the gears but won't hold power. At 80kmh in 4th(Santana) can feel a surge then when back of a bit comes clean. Has had new Filters 4000 Kms ago. I have Dyno specs here. when Turbo was fitted. 44kmh= 312nm & 35kw. 52kmh= 330nm & 44kw. 60kmh= 338nm & 54kw. 70kmh= 322nm & 60kw. 82kmh= 296nm & 62kw. 88kmh= 254nm & 61kw.
    Was done by Turbo Glide Wollongong. Are these numbers what I should expect? 1st 4BD1 I've ever owned. Tony

    PS. I didn't intend to post this on this thread. Sorry
    Last edited by Rangier Rover; 15th August 2008 at 09:26 PM. Reason: Posted in wrong place

  10. #20
    Rangier Rover Guest

    4BD1 LR 120?

    Sorry for posting here. Mods delete if you wish. Tony

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!