Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 27 of 27

Thread: Best (economic) engine for a LWB series hardtop?

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Melbourn(ish)
    Posts
    26,495
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr Whippy View Post
    Dave
    Would a series gearbox handle the torque of a 200 tdi?

    Dave.
    Quote Originally Posted by Blknight.aus View Post
    find and drop in the tdi200 and wind the fuel/boost way back.
    Yes.
    Dave

    "In a Landrover the other vehicle is your crumple zone."

    For spelling call Rogets, for mechanicing call me.

    Fozzy, 2.25D SIII Ex DCA Ute
    Tdi autoManual d1 (gave it to the Mupion)
    Archaeoptersix 1990 6x6 dual cab(This things staying)


    If you've benefited from one or more of my posts please remember, your taxes paid for my skill sets, I'm just trying to make sure you get your monies worth.
    If you think you're in front on the deal, pay it forwards.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Kiwiland
    Posts
    7,246
    Total Downloaded
    0
    This was a VY. The company had two of them, fuel economy was no different between them.
    I see wikipedia (which is as accurate as any other blog) claims 12 litres/100km, the 3.8 V6 saving 1 litre/100km over the 5.7 V8 manual. [ame="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holden_VY_Commodore"]Holden VY Commodore - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia@@AMEPARAM@@/wiki/File:Holden_VY_Berlina_01.jpg" class="image" title="Holden VY Berlina"><img alt="Holden VY Berlina" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/17/Holden_VY_Berlina_01.jpg/250px-Holden_VY_Berlina_01.jpg"@@AMEPARAM@@commons/thumb/1/17/Holden_VY_Berlina_01.jpg/250px-Holden_VY_Berlina_01.jpg[/ame]

    Forum claims run from 15 litres/100km to under 7 litres/100km for the same car with V8 and V6 drivers not much different. Apparently a pod filter can save you 5 litres/100km. Fuel Consumption.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Rockhampton, Queensland
    Posts
    414
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I've got a VZ wagon for work car and I'ts hard to get over 400km out of 60L of fuel around town. Leaving the power button on I get around 370km out of it. A total different story if doing a long trip on highway. Quite easy to get well over 600km. I guess I do have a slight heavy foot lol, but even if I'm careful it's not much better.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Illawarra
    Posts
    2,508
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Weight, gearing and how heavy your foot is all contribute to the final figure.
    In my old 94VR 5.0 v8 statesman(auto) we where getting 11.5-12.5l/100k's with around town and highway(as low as9.5-10 on long trips) driving but in the 98 3.4v6 prado(5spd man) on lpg it was between 16.5 and 18l /100k's but at less than 1/2 the price off petrol it was the same cost as my sisters corrolla /100k's for fuel. My wifes old 04prado 4.0v6 man was on LPG injection so no backfiring EVER and got 14-15l/100k's and virtually no power difference between gas and petrol but gas was a bit noisier from the engine bay.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Rockhampton, Queensland
    Posts
    414
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I spoke to my dad tonight and he mated the 18r to a hilux gearbox and transefer case back in 1984. He did the work himself and thought it would be a good conversion and to him it was. But yeah, the later 2.4 would be great.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    hobart
    Posts
    161
    Total Downloaded
    0

    ECONOMIC ENGINE

    My daily driver is a 92 Hi Ace with a 2RZ 2.4 petrol and 5spd. manual. Had it for 17 years and the motot was replaced at 454000, after a cook up at 235 due to cracked radiator.(wallaby)
    Always thought that motor would be good for 4wd as it is very smooth low down in the revs and pulls like a (small) tractor.
    Van usually has around 500-700kgs on board and does around 12l-100k

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    61
    Total Downloaded
    0
    If your not planning t d much hard off road work perhaps you could fit 3.54 diff ratios? Makes it much nicer on the highway, just not so grunty off road.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!