Page 7 of 10 FirstFirst ... 56789 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 91

Thread: combined trailing arm mount/body outrigger

  1. #61
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    5,101
    Total Downloaded
    0
    hmmmm......then why do I need a handbrake on an incline and not on flat level ground.

    I think im going to struggle with this one

  2. #62
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Kiwiland
    Posts
    7,246
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by uninformed View Post
    hmmmm......then why do I need a handbrake on an incline and not on flat level ground.
    Because the acceleration reaction has a component pointing backwards.

    Quote Originally Posted by uninformed View Post
    I think im going to struggle with this one
    Nah, just accept that they're the same, optimise your suspension for the flat acceleration and it'll climb well enough.

  3. #63
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    5,101
    Total Downloaded
    0
    problem is, flat ecelleration is more forgiving than hill climbing rutted tracks. For a good launch on flat you just need AS so it gets power down and goes forward...go up a hill climb, and the same AS, if high, will launch but straight away try and drive the axle under the rig instead of pushing the chassis forward. Yes there is throttle control, but with the response of the LR throttle it may be more forgiving to have a little less AS....but not so little the bum squats AND that the front end does not get loaded by the rear (think weight in tyres type of thing)

  4. #64
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Kiwiland
    Posts
    7,246
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by uninformed View Post
    problem is, flat ecelleration is more forgiving than hill climbing rutted tracks. For a good launch on flat you just need AS so it gets power down and goes forward...go up a hill climb, and the same AS, if high, will launch but straight away try and drive the axle under the rig instead of pushing the chassis forward. Yes there is throttle control, but with the response of the LR throttle it may be more forgiving to have a little less AS....but not so little the bum squats AND that the front end does not get loaded by the rear (think weight in tyres type of thing)
    Which is why you are putting in longer links in the first place. Minimise change in AS with suspension motion?

  5. #65
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    5,101
    Total Downloaded
    0
    thats it

    not sure if I should trust the word of a cyclist atm, in light of everything

  6. #66
    slug_burner is offline TopicToaster Gold Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    4,024
    Total Downloaded
    0
    you would need the handbrake on flat ground to stop your vehicle rolling away if it was subjected to a force equal to one G in the horizontal direction.

  7. #67
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    5,101
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by slug_burner View Post
    you would need the handbrake on flat ground to stop your vehicle rolling away if it was subjected to a force equal to one G in the horizontal direction.
    yep, but park it and it will stay put with no brakes, park it on a incline and it will roll.....my point was that I feel that the COG must change from flat to incline due to this among other things....that is the same things happen differently

    im probably very wrong, but it doesnt really matter as the point of my new TA is to deal with the physical limitaions of what can be done. As Dougal pointed out, all Im doing is reducing the change in stock set up, static height is important but changes as soon as you drive. If I can keep the changes less, then in THEROY it should be better

  8. #68
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    5,101
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Update

    I recieved a very friendly phone call from Qld Dot yesterday. I have been informed that as of Nov 1st, the new vehcile code comes into play here in Qld. They advised me to wait till after that and then contact a approved ENGINEER (read not just a blue plater). Saying that the new code is more flexable and that it will be up to the engineer to deem whether the idea is doable: that is, safe and within the new code.

    So it sounds like its a good chance (at this stage) But I have that sinking feeling, like most things in life "if you want to play, you's got to pay" Its sad its should cost so much to do something by the book and safe, but such is life.

    I asked for a list of approved engineers in my area:


    Queensland

    Clinton Harry
    38 Blackwood Road Geebung Qld 4034
    0438 738 454

    Alan Marburg
    P O Box 9385,
    Wynnum Plaza Qld 4178
    0410 669 075

    Len Emerick
    LW Emerick & Assoc.
    PO Box 1609
    Hervey Bay Qld 4655
    4128 6867

    Darren Dakin
    Altra 9 Pty Ltd
    PO Box 5570
    Brendale Q 4500
    0431 382 789

    Richard Larsen
    101 Lochinvar Road,
    Upper Kedron Qld 4055 3851 1066

    Werner Ihle
    3/28 Activity Cres
    Ashmore Qld 4214
    0418 551 331

    Garry Bow
    PO Box 120,
    Strathpine Qld 4500
    3881 1355

    Timothy Bartrop
    9 General Macarthur Place
    Redbank Qld 4301
    3280 8202

    Kevin Walsh
    Walsh Engineering Solutions Pty Ltd
    478 Boundary Street
    Toowoomba Q 4350
    4634 3344

    Bruce Hartwig
    Sapid Pty Ltd
    25 Raven Street,
    West End Qld 4101
    32551621

    Graeme Presley
    115 Radford Road
    Manly West 4179
    3348 2211

    Bruce Johnson
    4 Colworth Street, Sunnybank Hills Qld 4109
    0413 137 201 / Sunnybank 3344 1803; Cairns 4097 6731

    David Blythe
    DB Autotech
    26 Nicholson Avenue
    Salisbury Qld 4107
    0407 756 870
    www.dbautotech.com.au

    Maxwell Evans 42 Lincoln Green Drive,
    Forestdale Qld 4118 3800 8636

    Willem Saarberg
    24 Slatter Court, Brendale Qld 4500
    3396 6033

    Trent McMahon
    OS Imports,
    2 Solander Street, Carina Qld 4152
    0437 126 853

    Earl Gilchrist 4/70 Redland Bay Rd Capalaba Qld 4157
    0417 229 723
    John Allen
    P O Box 80,
    Thuringowa Central Qld 4810
    4788 8864

    Phillip Harris
    Pipers Glen
    315-331 Hein Road, Buccan Qld 4207
    5546 3126

    Timothy Gregg
    813 Upper Ormeau Road,
    Kingsholme Qld 4208 5547 5879

    David Turner
    Vehicle Safety Certifications & Heavy Vehicle Certifications GPO Box Brisbane 4002
    0434523282

    Raymond Miller
    6 Coughan Street
    The Gap Qld 4061
    3300 4700

    Lindsay Stone
    Livingstone Automotive
    36 Coates Street,
    Mount Louisa Qld 4814 4774 8807

    Christian Arendt
    4 Progress Road
    Rupertswood Qld 4817

    if anyone has used or knows of any of the above listed, please pm me with good or bad info

    cheers
    Serg

  9. #69
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    14,127
    Total Downloaded
    99.87 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by slug_burner View Post
    you would need the handbrake on flat ground to stop your vehicle rolling away if it was subjected to a force equal to one G in the horizontal direction.
    True for more and less than 1G also.
    Cheers
    Slunnie


    ~ Discovery II Td5 ~ Discovery 3dr V8 ~ Series IIa 6cyl ute ~ Series II V8 ute ~

  10. #70
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Dixons Creek Victoria
    Posts
    1,533
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by uninformed View Post
    problem is, flat ecelleration is more forgiving than hill climbing rutted tracks. For a good launch on flat you just need AS so it gets power down and goes forward...go up a hill climb, and the same AS, if high, will launch but straight away try and drive the axle under the rig instead of pushing the chassis forward. Yes there is throttle control, but with the response of the LR throttle it may be more forgiving to have a little less AS....but not so little the bum squats AND that the front end does not get loaded by the rear (think weight in tyres type of thing)
    Serg,I know that Antisquat has been discussed to death on the Pirate Forum, but not so much here.So I picked this post at random mainly to ask if you have calculated the position of the converging imaginary lines of the rear links otherwise known as the 'Instant Centre (IC')? The position of the IC in relation to the for/aft centre of gravity (COG), I would assume would determin the degree of antisquat (AS) that the system can generate.
    Just looking at my old standard Range Rover, and without crawling around underneath to measure link placement points, I would guess that the IC is probably forward of and below the COG.
    Now for the sake of the mental exercise, if we disregard the links and replace them with a Unimog style 'Torque Tube' that pivots from the chassis at the same location as the IC, and then twist the rear axle around the halfshaft axis, a lifting force would be applied at the IC, which being in front of and below the COG would cause the front of the body to rise and the rear to squat, would it not? This is not taking in to account the positive squatting forces that the front axle radius arms (RA's) impart.
    To clarify the reason for my question. I have never observed the rear of a RangeRover Classic squat or jack up under accelleration or on hill climbs.
    Another question. Is the climbing performance of a Discovery 2 inferior to that of a Disco 1 or RangeRover Classic? Presumably the rear radius arm suspension would give higher antisquat characteristics than the 3 link arrangement of the D! and RRC.
    Bill.

Page 7 of 10 FirstFirst ... 56789 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!