Originally Posted by
PhilipA
I have been watching this thread, as I recall several days ago that an Arrium employee claimed that wages were not that high and most earned $95K.
Now at the time i thought gee $95 K would be pretty good in a small town like Whyalla where houses should only be say 300K. ( unless of course it is like Karratha where houses were outrageous due to capapcity to pay)
So today in the Australian I read an Article by Robert Gottliebson which states the following.
QUOTE
Here some of the clauses that locked Arrium into administration in the event that the prices for its products fell:
? Wages levels are way above the award. An entry-level trade person begins at $120,476 and a level-5 tradie is on $160,631, with another increase to $165,450 due in March 2017. Production workers entry-level wage begins at $95,783 and tops out at $130,188.
Then there are the clauses that crippled flexibility and reduced management control:
? Union delegates are entitled to 10 days paid union training leave per year and afforded paid time, to ?interview a representative of the company on matters affecting employees?. This gives the union enormous power.
? Union notice boards are provided and the company cannot remove union notices unless special conditions apply.
? If the company restructures, and people are put into lower paying jobs, their old rate of pay is maintained forever, which cancels out the whole point of the exercise.
? If an employee with at least two years? service is declassified to a lower pay scale, not only do they stay on their old pay rate, but also the pay rate keeps rising in line with the rises due to the old rate for another two years.
? In the event the mine closes, redundancy pay is 4 weeks per year capped at 104 weeks.
? Where a redundancy is caused by innovation or mechanisation or new technology, the company must add an extra 3 months? notice or pay, on top of the two years.
? Arrium staff with a long-term, non-work related illness, for the purpose of ?added financial security?, are able to 'reasonably expect continued financial support? at their normal rates of pay for up to 12 months, and longer if they are expected to return shortly to the workplace.
QUOTE
The article also states that the banks suffered from "Groupthink" that made them make the stupid decision to loan billions to the company unsecured.
So should the rest of Australia support a company where the unions greed and spineless management has contributed greatly to its own demise?
Regards Philip A