Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 38

Thread: 101 Front diff

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Nowra NSW
    Posts
    3,906
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Peter
    a double cardon joint with a normal uni joint one end of the front tailshaft WILL NOT FIX the tailshaft rumble on a 101 and in fact could make it much worse.
    The only situation where that type of tailshaft set up will work on a rolled front diff and the double cardon fitted to the transfer case side of things.
    The way you are currently running the after market tailshaft is most likely producing more vibs than the standard 101 tailshaft with a normal uni joint each end
    the standard design goes some where near to getting a constant velocity effect from one end of the tailshaft to the other by the speed variations cancelling themselves out by having the uni joints at opposite angles to each other.
    The other solution is a after market tailshaft with a double cardon joint each end giving a constant velocity effect no matter what the angles are.
    a front tailshaft with double cardon joints each end will have a even more steeper angle of operation due to the extra lenght of the joints and will be weaker and very unsteady when worn.
    Two CV joints like used on a current JK jeep tail shaft may work , but will have a short operating life on a 101 again due to running at steeper angles than they where designed for.
    Note when CV and and double cardon joints let go they tend to not give much warning in a situation like that of a 101.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Nowra NSW
    Posts
    3,906
    Total Downloaded
    0
    One of the main reasons the standard tailshaft rumbles/buzz/rattles on the float going down a hillis the high speed the thing spins at due to low diff ratios and the middle of the tailshaft having to go though four speed variations per revolution with the tailshaft tube and splines having mass.
    does this matter at the end of the day and the answer is no.
    It doesnt cause any major problems other than needing to grease frequenty and keep tight various bolts etc of the front drive line.
    high unijoint wear on the standard shaft is caused by high rotational shaft speeds and high operating angles.
    standard 101 tail shafts are cheap and easy to replace uni joints on.
    Series three and other model landrover shafts can easily be chopped and fitted as a replacement at low cost.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Nowra NSW
    Posts
    3,906
    Total Downloaded
    0
    things which reduce the tail shaft buzz of a 101 is.
    1/ fit a overdrive as you can power on for longer going down a hill for longer and not get into the over run tailshaft buzz situation.
    2/ have a tailshaft in good nick.
    3/ have a light weight tail shaft..ie not heavy duty as it will have less inertia and allow a higher speed before the tail shaft buzz comes in.
    4/ when setting up the diff pinion go for the maximum crown wheel back lash of 12 thou as this gives the tailshaft room to move when it buzzes with out a load on it.
    The pinion hitting the ring gear quickly front one side of the gear to the other is what really causes the noise due to the four speed differences per revolution partly caused by high speed inertia.
    I tighten my pinion to crown wheel clearence to 4 thou thinking I was doing the right thing and made it slightly worse.
    5/ grease the spline before a long trip as the grease acts as a shock asorber in the splines and lessons the noise.
    On a standard tailshaft set up in good condition the noise doesnt matter a stuff to the vehicle and it is only the driver which has a problem with it and non 101 informed mechanics who think there is some wrong with the drive line.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Nowra NSW
    Posts
    3,906
    Total Downloaded
    0
    If i was going to stop the 101 tailshaft buzz( I am not going to as it is not worth it)
    I would try some sort of cush drive.( rubber donut on a standard shaft and uni ,s)
    It wouldnt stop the buzz in the real world, but would reduce the noise as the pinion rattles against the ring gear.
    higher diff ratios would very greatly help, but a 4.6 litre motor would be needed for that.
    A two ended double cardon or CV tail shaft would work , but the short life and high costs for the 101 application rules it out for me.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Williamstown, Barossa, SA
    Posts
    3,451
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Hello! I owned a 101 for several years in the UK, and yup I had the same noise from the front prop. 1, Change the 5.9 to 1 crown and pinnion for 4.7 to 1 c&p found in Ser 3 rear axle (this rases the gearing and slows the props which helped mine and was needed for the impending diesel conversion). 2, Change the 4 sp box for a 5 sp Santana Box (early V8 110). This pushes the transfer box position back and eliminates the noise (or it did when I shoe horned a 6cyl 6ltr Nissan diesel into mine) and 3, make up a CV jointed front prop. (I did using early Rangie cv's which worked well untill the diesel tore them appart.. (very messy))! Do not cut the axle and tip the diff as Salisbury diffs do not like to run with a dry pinnion bearing! Simon!

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I agree with all Ron has said HOWEVER Landrover installed a double carden on the gearbox end of the front driveshaft on the Series 3 Stage 1 and much later in the Discovery 2 - obviously done for a reason - reduce vibration.

    My driveshaft is rubber filled and takes a lot of the vibration out - can still feel it and now only rarely hear it over the 101 already loud noises.

    I think the solution is DC, rubber filled shaft, lower drivers side engine gearbox mounts, rotate front diff housing (oil level needs adjustment to prevent dry pinion bearings) if you do not want to change diff ratios. I have calculated drive shaft RPMS at different speeds and it is only about 10% more in a 101 over other landies and about the same where other landies are at higher speeds (120-130kph).

    Moving the gearbox back will cause issues with the rear drive shaft as it is already steeper and shorter than the front shaft (still not sure why the noise comes form the front and not the rear).

    Garry

    Garry
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

  7. #17
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Cornubia
    Posts
    131
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Thanks for all the input, good point about running the pinion bearing dry with a changed angle on the diff Simon.
    Guess I will get it back together and try a few things from there.
    I will try both the DC and standard front shaft to see if there is any difference.
    Dropping the RHS of the motor gearbox sound like a feasible option.
    Quote Originally Posted by garrycol View Post
    Why bother - two trips offroad and it will be just as crappy as it was before and the dirt never comes off. I completely repainted the whole underside of my 101 just before I put it back on the road and now 8 months later it is just as crappy as it was and it gets an underbody wash after each trip offroad.
    At least I will know what is under the crap I put on it, good chance to check everything out, already found a few issues. Also getting rid of the silver underbelly is a priority plus I have a bit of time on my hands,

    Peter

  8. #18
    R12 Krad Guest

    101 front and rear complete axle assy's

    Hi all, I recently sold my 101 and supply trailer to a fellow here in Adelaide. I found that the propshaft vibration could be limited if the pinion nut was tightened a flat or two ( no more) I never worried too much about the racket it made though and I have driven the vehicle on many extended trips to the Flinders Ranges and interstate without it ever getting any worse. Most drivers just get very good at balancing the engine load on the drive line. NOW CHAPS.... DO ANY OF YOU KNOW WHERE I MIGHT FIND A SET OF 101 AXLE ASSYS COMPLETE OR IN OTHER WORDS A UNIT BEING WRECKED SOMEWHERE ? cheers Dave

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by R12 Krad View Post
    DO ANY OF YOU KNOW WHERE I MIGHT FIND A SET OF 101 AXLE ASSYS COMPLETE OR IN OTHER WORDS A UNIT BEING WRECKED SOMEWHERE ? cheers Dave
    About the only place I can think of is Land Rover 101 - British 4wd Imports - Home Page

    Garry
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

  10. #20
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Cornubia
    Posts
    131
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Pinion bearing pre-load

    Has anyone ever done the pinion bearings on these diffs?
    I have the new ones in with all new bits including the collapsable bearing spacer. I have done the nut up just enough so there is no play in the bearings at this stage.
    The book (P 51.15.07 para 86) states that I should keep doing it up until it has 30-40 ft/lb torque resistance to rotation. This seems very excessive to me, do they mean turning it with a torque wrench on the nut?
    The book (P51.20.01 para 5) mentions a "Torquemaster" or a spring balance to measure torque to rotate.
    Anyone got any clues please?

    Peter

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!