Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 34

Thread: Defender 130, TD5 or Puma?

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Samford
    Posts
    704
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Chops View Post
    not so keen on getting a manual though,, but both cars are the same that way
    I can't believe no one has commented on this yet!

  2. #12
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    2,827
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by brendanm View Post
    Some of the issues with the TD5 were warped exhaust manifold that pulled the studs from the alloy head, EGR valve burning out, .......
    This is false.

    Studs have bee known to break. not "pull out of the head". Furthermore stud breakage is not a problem unique to the TD5, neither is it a given that all, TD5s will break a stud.

    EGRs are known to block up and fail, not "burn out". and is again not unique to a TD5.

    The difference between actual issues and the highlighted aspect of the post is unhelpful to the OP.

    cheers

  3. #13
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Safety Bay
    Posts
    8,041
    Total Downloaded
    0
    For me I could have spent 10K on my Tdi and made it really nice,I could have bought a late model Td5 and spent money on it making it really nice but my Puma is all new.The 2.4 punches above it's weight,the gearbox is just good with very well matched ratio's,the suspension is just right,the whole thing is just plain good.I love my Tdi and always will but no matter how much I look at it it's still a 13 year old vehicle.The world moves on and so do vehicle improvements. Pat

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Yarrawonga, Vic
    Posts
    6,568
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by VladTepes View Post

    The TD5 also has lots of things wrong with it - a mate who was trained as a LR mechanic reckons they are "disposable".
    What ?? OK how about I come collect all your 'Disposable' TD5 engines when your done with them, Hell, I'll even waive my 'environmental recovery levy'

    Of all the LandRovers I've owed & the 3 Toyotas plus other vehicles the TD5 is by far the most impressive engine of the lot of them - by a long shot.

    Looking forward to a Puma if my TD5 ever meets the 'disposable' status, but I reckon I will expire before it does thanks to the centrifuge oil filter.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Aussie Expat in NZ
    Posts
    3,451
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Have your missus sit in the passenger seat of a td5 and a puma. If she has legs she will not be happy with the td5, as the aircon is located in the passenger footwell. It's fine for about an hour then the complaining will quickly drown out all other noise.

    With the puma, you also get a heater that works and a dash that won't disintegrate after the first pothole.

    If your family enjoy being in your landy, you will get to use it more... I changed the plans quite a bit for my county after wanting to go camping but my missus said she would love too but wasn't real keen on spending hours being shaken to death in a deafeningly loud oven. She has (very lovely) long legs and doesn't like to go for too long in my fathers td5.

    Just my take on it. I'll let others argue the tech.. as I believe they are both great engines.
    Hercules: 1986 110 Isuzu 3.9 (4BD1-T)
    Brutus: 1969 109 ExMil 2a FFT (loved and lost)

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Gone
    Posts
    1,329
    Total Downloaded
    0
    After my last post regarding the Puma, I sat and thought about it a little longer. I have realized that if I am out in the middle of nowhere in a TD5 in Western Australia, engine and gearbox parts are only available in Perth. For a Puma, I could check with the local Ford Dealer if a vacum pump ect failed.
    Perhaps now the Puma is a better option.

    Allan

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Ipswich QLD.
    Posts
    1,784
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Not sure where the 2700 rpm @ 100 kph comes from, my td5 130 sits on around 2100 rpm @100 kph.

    Cheers, Mick.
    1968 SIIa SWB
    1978 SIII Game SWB
    2002 130 Crew Cab HCPU

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    6,078
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Allan View Post
    After my last post regarding the Puma, I sat and thought about it a little longer. I have realized that if I am out in the middle of nowhere in a TD5 in Western Australia, engine and gearbox parts are only available in Perth. For a Puma, I could check with the local Ford Dealer if a vacum pump ect failed.
    Perhaps now the Puma is a better option.

    Allan
    A td5 wouldn't need a vacuum pump!

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Perth, WA
    Posts
    1,947
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Psimpson7 View Post
    A td5 wouldn't need a vacuum pump!
    But it would need a fuel pump, and an injector harness.....

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    6,078
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Touche!

    I carry a spare fuel pump

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!