-
4th November 2011, 03:56 PM
#1
OEM 110 & 130 trailing arms. Are they Different?
Today I've been playing with my 150 putting in bushes etc. Am now wire brushing off the trailing arms with a 4" grinder.
One trailing arm had its nut cut off with a gas axe and it and it's partner (I assume) had slight bends. So when I went to my local LR workshop to push in the radius arm bushes I acquired another pair of trailing arms. They came off a 130.
First I wire brushed the 130 arms, then I went to the originals (Same length). What I noticed is that the originals ring like a tubular bell where the 130's didn't seem to do it.
Is there a difference in wall thickness of the tube, or did something else change?
Diana
You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.
-
4th November 2011, 04:01 PM
#2
I am fairly certain that 80's spec One Tens had different construction (stronger?) trailing arms than 110 Defenders.
-
5th November 2011, 09:59 PM
#3
Mark
You are correct, I managed to acquire a parts catalogue and it seems that the trailing arms experienced a change from NTC4720 (solid) to NTC8328 (hollow) at VIN #HA470437 end of 1990.
Which begs the question, are the solids better than the hollows?
And
Which axle would people fit the solids, B axle or C axle?
Diana
You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
|
Search All the Web!
|
Bookmarks