There is nothing stupid about a 6bt cummins, perhaps a little overkill for our application. It's little brother the 4bt(3.9lt) would be a perfect swap in a defender, problem is they are a little thin on the ground here in Australia. I only mentioned the 6bt because I have one sitting in the shed for my 61 f100 unibody project. Also 6bt have been successfully fitted to a number of defenders, one of which was a 90!!!
It's the old way to "break" a record in a defender.
The old f truck has already had a substantial brake upgrade uninformed. I got the 6bt real cheap with an adapter to ford bell housing, flywheel and engine mounts to suit Cleveland base plates. I have not 100% made my mind up yet as to what engine to run. Leaning towards the cummins for fuel economy, geared right they should easily get 10l/ 100km.
Sorry to everyone else I realize this is o/t
whoops, I think ive entered the F Truck forum.....or is it related because at some point Ford owned LR
The 4bt is a great engine, but IMO its weight is an issue for LR...like I said IMO.
a 6bt, no bloody way! yes it can be done, yes it has been done, just like GMC V8 diesels etc, doesnt make it a great idea
each to their own
Dave
"In a Landrover the other vehicle is your crumple zone."
For spelling call Rogets, for mechanicing call me.
Fozzy, 2.25D SIII Ex DCA Ute
TdiautoManual d1 (gave it to the Mupion)
Archaeoptersix 1990 6x6 dual cab(This things staying)
If you've benefited from one or more of my posts please remember, your taxes paid for my skill sets, I'm just trying to make sure you get your monies worth.
If you think you're in front on the deal, pay it forwards.
Chipping will only slightly mask the smaller cubes. New engines are better, but I bet anyone would prefer to drive the new 3.2 over the 2.2
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! |
Search All the Web! |
|---|
|
|
|
Bookmarks