Page 7 of 7 FirstFirst ... 567
Results 61 to 64 of 64

Thread: Has my Puma got a DPF or not.

  1. #61
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Now in Sunny Perth
    Posts
    443
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Toyota, no chance the brakes are all knackered on them

    Forgot, we did have a VW when I was a kid, a camper. The engine seized in Scotland but the bed was comfortable

  2. #62
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Yarrawonga, Vic
    Posts
    6,568
    Total Downloaded
    0
    speaking of Toyotas I just searched LCOOL for DPF issues, and can't find any,
    but this is very interesting
    (from another forum)

    Due to the pollution control measures of the EC diesel-oil is nearly sulphur free and contains up to 5% of bio-diesel. Sulphur has the property to grease the high pressure injection pump and the injectors. Without sulphur, the reduced greasing property of the new diesel has already shown negativ impacts on the long-term stability of the injectors and the high pressure pump. The pump manufacturers have tried to react by lining the moving parts of the pumps with teflon or other suitable material. However, the long term stability is still not achieved as with the old (sulphor contained) diesel.

    The engine-research centre of a well known German car manufacurer has conducted some long term tests of diesel additives to find out whether any one of them will have an impact on the long term reliability of the diesel engine components. This introduction to explain were my information comes from.
    The results of this research: any diesel additive of any manufacturer presently on the market is not worth the money!

    BUT: 2-stroke oil, which we use in our motor saws, lawn mower or in 2-stroke motor engines has shown to have an extreme positive impact on diesel engines, if such 2-stroke oil is added to the diesel in a homoeophatic dosis of 1:200. In practical terms: 0,300 litre of 2-stroke oil into the 70l diesel tank. The 2-stroke oil will be absorbed by the diesel (emulsion) and grease every moving part of the high pressure pump and the injectors.

    Besides this, the 2-stroke oil will keep the diesel engine clean, as it burnes cleaner as the diesel itself.

    In other words, the 2-stroke oil has a much lower ash-content as diesel, when burned. This proven fact delays the DPF (diesel particulate (soot) filter) to clogg, and the "burn free" process of the DPF will be much less.
    One more information: in Germany we have to present our cars every 2 years to the TUV -Technical Supervision Organisation - who will check, amongs others, the pollution of petrol and diesel engines.
    The measured cloud-factor of a diesel engine without use of 2-stroke oil has been 0,95.
    The same factor with the use of 2-stroke oil has been 0,47 - reduction of nearly half of the soot particles.
    Besides this, the use of 2-stroke oil in the diesel will increase the milage by 3-5%.
    _________________
    hmmm, wonder if 2 stroke is as good as FTC ???

  3. #63
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    13,786
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by goingbush View Post
    speaking of Toyotas I just searched LCOOL for DPF issues, and can't find any,
    but this is very interesting


    hmmm, wonder if 2 stroke is as good as FTC ???
    Sorry GB but that post you quoted is a complete pile of brown stinky stuff.
    For starters, sulphur is a contaminant not a lubricant. It does not improve lubricity.

  4. #64
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    21
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Referring to the bush fires - if a DPF is causing a fire, how dare people to drive same places with petrol engined cars with cats? I think their usual operating temperatures ought to be even higher.

Page 7 of 7 FirstFirst ... 567

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!