Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 33

Thread: Puma snorkel warning

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Connolly, WA
    Posts
    1,671
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by ProjectDirector View Post
    Also, this workshop recommended against Mantec or LR version as it is not waterproof, but they said if i insisted on LR version they can modify it, it was too expensive anyway.
    Obviously stocks the Safari as any snorkel/ RAI is only as waterproof as the ducting to the air box and into the engine. In a standard Puma this will not happen without special kit like Nugget's, regardless of what the workshop claims.

    Scallops, great news mate! I have the Mantec one and if it works on a OME Puma RAI it will work on the Mantec.

    Only Defender I ever managed to seal close to perfect was my last 300Tdi. Safari with a "home made" duct of 78mm reinforced rubber tubing. I could suffocate the engine to a stand still by covering the top of the snorkel (intake off) with an old piece of mud flap...

    Cheers,

    Lou

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    928
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Lucky

    Im glad I read this before crossing Yardi Creek ( Exmouth) in a day or 2. I thought my snorkel factory (dealer ) fitted was the ducks nuts and water proof. No time to seal it up before we go so hope the water is not too deep.
    Mike

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Burra NSW
    Posts
    933
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Defender Mike View Post
    Im glad I read this before crossing Yardi Creek ( Exmouth) in a day or 2. I thought my snorkel factory (dealer ) fitted was the ducks nuts and water proof. No time to seal it up before we go so hope the water is not too deep.
    Mike
    If it makes you feel better, I have run across the Murray at Tom groggin and geehi with a factory RAI more times than I care to remember with the water over the bonnet and a couple of times up to the windscreen wipers in my puma, no probs, just siliconed the flexible ducting and the air box intake..

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Tangambalanga
    Posts
    7,558
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Summiitt View Post
    If it makes you feel better, I have run across the Murray at Tom groggin and geehi with a factory RAI more times than I care to remember with the water over the bonnet and a couple of times up to the windscreen wipers in my puma, no probs, just siliconed the flexible ducting and the air box intake..
    We have done the same, although not quite that high, never had a drama, although I'll be checking mine tomorrow anyway.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Central Coast NSW
    Posts
    1,576
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Summiitt View Post
    If it makes you feel better, I have run across the Murray at Tom groggin and geehi with a factory RAI more times than I care to remember with the water over the bonnet and a couple of times up to the windscreen wipers in my puma, no probs, just siliconed the flexible ducting and the air box intake..

    Did you bother to check the air box or filter for water egress ? Or we're you just happy to drive on ?

    Not trying to be clever, but the from the tip of my snorkel to the air box is 100% sealed, no doubt - no question.......and I still got water in the air box after Nolan's Brook last year !

    We're from.......the air box lid

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    497
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Loubrey View Post
    Obviously stocks the Safari as any snorkel/ RAI is only as waterproof as the ducting to the air box and into the engine. In a standard Puma this will not happen without special kit like Nugget's, regardless of what the workshop claims.

    Scallops, great news mate! I have the Mantec one and if it works on a OME Puma RAI it will work on the Mantec.

    Only Defender I ever managed to seal close to perfect was my last 300Tdi. Safari with a "home made" duct of 78mm reinforced rubber tubing. I could suffocate the engine to a stand still by covering the top of the snorkel (intake off) with an old piece of mud flap...

    Cheers,

    Lou
    Well, you are right, they are ARB agents so guess what snorkel they will recommend. Thing is, the mantec is $100 dearer than the safari and LR $200 more. Is there any difference between the three apart from the traditional look?
    I certainly prefer the traditional look but concerned about air tightness and cost.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Nanny state UK...
    Posts
    3,253
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Disco Muppet View Post
    Except Nugget's not talking about the LR factory RAI.
    He's talking about the Safari Snorkel, which is exactly as it's name suggests, a snorkel for wading.
    As such, it's a valid concern.
    As much as you don't want to hear it, FONFE is correct.

    The wading depth on the Defender is only 500mm, anything more is done at your own risk and not warranted in any way.

    M

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Jandakot, Western Australia
    Posts
    343
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Defender Mike View Post
    Im glad I read this before crossing Yardi Creek ( Exmouth) in a day or 2. I thought my snorkel factory (dealer ) fitted was the ducks nuts and water proof. No time to seal it up before we go so hope the water is not too deep.
    Mike
    Most of the time the sandbar is high and dry there and ok to drive on, I wouldn't be too keen on driving through sea water high enough to need a snorkel anyway.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    On sebaticle with work in Penang for a bit life is good 👍
    Posts
    433
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I was there a month ago with work.

    Yardi Creek was landlocked then. Sand is super soft though so momentum is your friend.

    Cheers, Chris

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Orange, NSW
    Posts
    7,965
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by camel_landy View Post
    As much as you don't want to hear it, FONFE is correct.

    The wading depth on the Defender is only 500mm, anything more is done at your own risk and not warranted in any way.

    M
    I'm not arguing against that, and it doesn't bother me as I don't have a defender

    My point was the difference between a raised air intake and a snorkel, they both do similar functions but the snorkel is designed for water work primarily.
    However as Nugget has pointed out, it's not so much an issue with the snorkel, it's the airbox.
    The Phantom - Oslo Blue 2001 Td5 SE.
    Half dead but will live again!

    Nina - Chawton White 2003 Td5 S
    Slowly being improved

    Quote Originally Posted by Judo View Post
    You worry me sometimes Muppet!!


Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!