Page 13 of 14 FirstFirst ... 311121314 LastLast
Results 121 to 130 of 140

Thread: County rear disk brake conversion, pics & p/n's

  1. #121
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East-South-East Girt-By-Sea
    Posts
    17,662
    Total Downloaded
    1.20 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by steveG View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Lotz-A-Landies View Post
    Have been talking to Barry at Hi-Tough this morning, we may be able to do the conversions with the FTC1740 stubs, Disco 1 hubs and use one of the HTE flanges to compensate for the different axle length. Even if we need a batch of special flanges.

    The Disco hubs require different flanges to the drum Defender already.

    Awaiting my measurements over the weekend.
    That would be a really good option for those who already have an investment in early style (long) aftermarket axles.

    Steve
    Have been unable to acquire the FTC 1740 stubs in Sydney, does anyone close by have one I could borrow Friday till Sunday?

    You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.

  2. #122
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Near Seven Hills, Sydney
    Posts
    4,342
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Suppose it wouldn't do to ask if there is a hub combo that'll reduce front track by the requisite amount to keep track equal front and rear?

    Which would also mean my rim/tyre combo would fit under the guards just about perfectly instead of rubbing on the guards at full tuck

  3. #123
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Aussie Expat in NZ
    Posts
    3,451
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Are the bearings the same between the the flat type and slot type stub axles? ( that Murray has pictures of at the start of this thread) I bought a kit that has the slot type washers and timkin bearings p/n stc4382 but they will require "encouragement" to go on the stub axles. The old ones slid off without any trouble - not sure what is right here?
    Hercules: 1986 110 Isuzu 3.9 (4BD1-T)
    Brutus: 1969 109 ExMil 2a FFT (loved and lost)

  4. #124
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Geelong, VIC
    Posts
    4,442
    Total Downloaded
    0
    All the same bearings.
    Not just a machining burr is it? Or simply cocked a bit?

    Steve
    1985 County - Isuzu 4bd1 with HX30W turbo, LT95, 255/85-16 KM2's
    1988 120 with rust and potential
    1999 300tdi 130 single cab - "stock as bro"
    2003 D2a Td5 - the boss's daily drive

  5. #125
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Woolgoolga
    Posts
    7,870
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Flagg, my new bearings were the same, old ones slid off, new ones I had to drive one. They were timken as well.

  6. #126
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Aussie Expat in NZ
    Posts
    3,451
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Thanks guys, with some oil and cleaning up I was able to get them on.
    Hercules: 1986 110 Isuzu 3.9 (4BD1-T)
    Brutus: 1969 109 ExMil 2a FFT (loved and lost)

  7. #127
    UBZ Guest
    I am just abut to fit a Full Disc braked axle to the rear of my 93 200tdi Defender 110 .

    I have read this whole thread and have found no mention of a residual valve in the factory rear drum break circuit .

    normally when doing rear disc break conversions on other 4x4s (suzuki/toyota), You have to remove the reside valve from the rear break circuit. This is to stop the pads constantly rubbing on the discs and prematurely wearing out.
    Drums require this valve to stop brake creep AFAIK

    I would assume that a D1 booster does not have one as it is designed for disc brakes on all corners .

    I would prefer to just keep the Defender booster for now as
    A: I just found out about the D1 Booster (this thread) and I don't have one
    B: Less work on the Brakes for me
    C: Can be done on the future

    Can anyone enlighten me further in regards to the residual valve?

  8. #128
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    13,786
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I have never seen a residual valve on a 110. There is just a straight line between the proportioning valve at the front and the rear flex line on all I have seen.

    I just swapped the rear axle in a 1987 110. I touched nothing else in the braking system. The brakes work well and the rears don't lock up too early.

  9. #129
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East-South-East Girt-By-Sea
    Posts
    17,662
    Total Downloaded
    1.20 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by isuzurover View Post
    I have never seen a residual valve on a 110. There is just a straight line between the proportioning valve at the front and the rear flex line on all I have seen.

    I just swapped the rear axle in a 1987 110. I touched nothing else in the braking system. The brakes work well and the rears don't lock up too early.
    Is it a proportioning valve, or merely a brake fail switch that activates when there is significantly differential pressures in the front and rear systems?

    You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.

  10. #130
    Judo's Avatar
    Judo is offline ChatterBox Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Parkdale, Melbourne
    Posts
    2,919
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Well the 110 (and Disco) brake fluid reservoir is split in 2 halves so if there's a leak you can only lose half. I guess this mitigates the need for the safety value function?
    - Justin

    '95 Disco 300TDI - sold
    '86 County 110 Isuzu
    2006 Range Rover Vogue td6

Page 13 of 14 FirstFirst ... 311121314 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!