Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst ... 34567 LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 63

Thread: Defender Airbags v coils. Final verdict

  1. #41
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    917
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I want to do this, but I'm worried about roadworthiness rules and insurance. In Victoria would you need engineers certificates?

  2. #42
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Aussie Expat in NZ
    Posts
    3,451
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by BilboBoggles View Post
    I want to do this, but I'm worried about roadworthiness rules and insurance. In Victoria would you need engineers certificates?
    I'd say yes, but contact VicRoads to be sure. If they say no, get it in writing and keep it with you in the car incase plod disagree.
    Hercules: 1986 110 Isuzu 3.9 (4BD1-T)
    Brutus: 1969 109 ExMil 2a FFT (loved and lost)

  3. #43
    TonyC is offline Wizard Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    NE Victoria
    Posts
    1,413
    Total Downloaded
    32.83 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by BilboBoggles View Post
    I want to do this, but I'm worried about roadworthiness rules and insurance. In Victoria would you need engineers certificates?
    Yes engineering is needed. See section 13.6 in this document on the Vicroads website.

    http://www.vicroads.vic.gov.au/NR/rd...orvehicles.pdf

    Tony

  4. #44
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    917
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Last time I looked into an Engineer certificate was for a single bolt for a child restraint, and that was could to cost several hundred dollars. I would guess that such an extensive mod is going to cost a fortune to certify. Has anyone done this?

    Are there any companies offering a certified conversion kit in Victoria?

  5. #45
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Banana Qld
    Posts
    222
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by BilboBoggles View Post
    Last time I looked into an Engineer certificate was for a single bolt for a child restraint, and that was could to cost several hundred dollars. I would guess that such an extensive mod is going to cost a fortune to certify. Has anyone done this?

    Are there any companies offering a certified conversion kit in Victoria?
    Give Air bag man a ring. I asked them about this when I bought mine. I assume they are certifide in Vic as well, but they will soon set you strait.
    Fitted my Air On Board pump today, much more confident in the system now. still a few bits to fix up but that can wait till I get back.

  6. #46
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Scarborough, QLD
    Posts
    3,315
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Albert View Post
    Give Air bag man a ring. I asked them about this when I bought mine. I assume they are certifide in Vic as well, but they will soon set you strait.
    Fitted my Air On Board pump today, much more confident in the system now. still a few bits to fix up but that can wait till I get back.
    So, what's the story re: engineering certificate for QLD?

  7. #47
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Kiwiland
    Posts
    7,246
    Total Downloaded
    0
    So getting back to this cross-linking. It appears the classics and P38's do it on the front bags.

    According to the official literature, When initially moving off and then every time the speed drops to nothing, the front bags valves are opened to allow the pressure to equalize between the two front bags.

    So. In an offroad situation, continuing to move will make them keep operating as independent springs. But stop (for example being cross-axled) and the valves will open to allow the pressures to equalise and the bags to cross-link. Letting the high side compress and the low side extend more than they would.
    This makes perfect sense, because otherwise the combination of the large front sway bar and highly progressive air springs would prevent these vehicles ever getting through a marginal cross-axle situation.

    I am not sure at what or any point the self-levelling then takes back over. The side-side levelling of classics and P38's is done solely on the rear bags, but the height of the fronts is read for levelling purposes where the lowest height is used. If the front bit counts are set wrong, the ECU on mine spends a bit of time shuffling air in and out to find a suitable height. There is I think a 2 bit window for the dead-zone where it deems the height to be correct.
    Setting the front height sensor bits unevenly results in more valve activity, but it still levels out.

  8. #48
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    'The Creek' Captain Creek, QLD
    Posts
    3,724
    Total Downloaded
    0
    IIRC the air springs used in RRC and P38's were of a different style to the Firestone 1T style air springs. I can only guess why Firestone caution against carrying load over when the 1T air springs are near full stroke.

    Firestone provide a design manual for using their air springs for suspension, which they refer to as 'airide' and a separate manual for actuators and vibration isolators ('airstroke' and 'airmount'). The data sheet I posted earlier was from the airstroke and airmount manual, but a good deal of it is relevant to the same air spring when used for suspension. Unfortunately the airide manual only includes one data sheet for illustration. Airide data sheets have more information that is useful for suspension design, but much of that can be calculated from the static data provided in airstroke/airmount data sheets (see my spreadsheet for springs that I have posted elsewhere on aulro).

    When the 1T style air spring extends beyond the height where the bellows begins to roll off the piston, the effective area reduces at a rapid rate. This can be seen on the constant pressure curves for load vs length, where even at 100 psi, the load is small at maximum extension.

    This, I guess, is the crux of why Firestone say not to carry load at those lengths - as the sustained periods of the high pressure required, combined with a stretched bellows, leads to failure of the bellows near the bead where the end closure is crimped on. Another issue would be the additional increase in pressure of the trapped air as the air spring is compressed from near it's maximum height.

    However it may also result in the bellows not rolling back onto the piston properly as it is compressed from maximum extension under load.

    With a manual control system for ride height, unless limit straps or shockies were set-up to limit maximum extension, it would be possible to inadvertently raise the air spring too far under high load - user beware!

    Edit: this pic is the air springs I fitted to my rangie many years ago. They had a useable height range from 7" to 20". From the one on the right you can see how the effective area reduces when the bellows is no longer rolling on the piston.
    Attached Images Attached Images

  9. #49
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Kiwiland
    Posts
    7,246
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Here are some pics from my RRC with factory EAS.
    It only has ~165mm of stroke. From the bumpstops low ride height is +60mm, std height is +80mm, hi position is +120 and max height is ~165mm.

    Old bags vs new bags:
    The old bag is a front which is supposed to be 350mm long when new. The replacement is a rear bag which is 360mm long as shown.


    Old bag at Hi Position Left Front. This one was leaking.
    [/B]

    Other side at Max extension (this is ~45mm higher than the offroad hi position should be. But at this point my heights were a bit screwy).


    Close up same position:


    New bag installed and on the bumpstops, this is a 360mm rear bag installed on the front:


    Same bag at the offroad high position.
    Attached Images Attached Images

  10. #50
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    NSW
    Posts
    170
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I have written to RMS or RTA or whatever they are called this week requesting direction to the legislation regarding a conversion. I understand it will need to be engineered, but the only problem they have with it is in the way the controller behaves.

    From what I understand, the controller is supposed to:
    -prevent the driver making adjustments while the vehicle is moving
    -have some sort of mechanism in place to respond to a catastrophic blowout

    I see no logic in paying $1500+ for a controller when I can get the bags for $150 each

    I will post what they respond with for others

Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst ... 34567 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!