The diff used in the Salisbury is way over strong for a Land Rover intended for the use that most here put them to.
There is no getting away from the facts about Salisbury downsides, e.g.
- heavy
- diff doesn't "drop-out" for major diff maintenance
- large, which reduces ground clearance
- too light wall thickness of axle tubes in the standard 110 version, if the vehicle will be driven over many km's of rough roads while overloaded. Note this is unlikely for Salisbury's used 130's as they have thicker axle tubes. The problem with the wall thickness is not the strength, they are comparable to rover axle tubes, but the stress raiser created by the sudden change in stiffness at the transition from the rigid housing to the more flexible axle tube, which can cause a fatigue failure.
The strength limit of a Salisbury rear axle assembly (leaving aside 101's for this post) is the 24 spline half shafts. If more strength is required 35 spline half shafts are readily available and a relatively easy up-grade, which many have done. The diff itself can have 40 spline half shafts, but then there are problems with the spindles and hubs, for no good reason (35 spline is overkill for most here).
For anyone to suggest that a rover diff has remotely similar strength to a Salisbury diff is ludicrous.
IMO, a suitable match for a Land Rover is somewhere in the middle ground between the rover diff and Salisbury diff.
The P38 diff should have been that, but someone stuffed up the design.
What Ashcroft have done to remedy that, will suit many people. IMHO, given 24 spline half shafts being the weak link, it is not unreasonable to suggest/argue that a P38 style axle assembly upgraded with the Ashcroft diff, will match the Salisbury axle assembly strength.
There are other diffs and axle assemblies out there in that middle ground. Ford 9" has been mentioned, but the list is long, given so many 4x4 wagons in the market place with stronger axle assemblies than Land Rover's.



Reply With Quote

Bookmarks