Page 33 of 116 FirstFirst ... 2331323334354383 ... LastLast
Results 321 to 330 of 1152

Thread: Defenders on "Car Sales."

  1. #321
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    4,842
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Smile

    Quote Originally Posted by MrLandy View Post
    The heritage edition marked the end of production of the Land Rover Defender. The fanfare, the celebrities, the big sand drawing. Defender is finished.

    ...So, no Pickles. As I've said many times, there will not be another Defender IMO.

    Which, in the context of this thread, is why Defender prices are rising so much.
    No worries.
    I wish that you were right, because I don't want another vehicle named "Defender" either,...I think that the models we have "stand for something", and I think that any "New" Defender will be different, a bit removed from what we now have.
    So, I think that there should be a new name for for the "new" vehicle, to distinguish it from the old generation Defender.
    However, I believe, and remember I don't want it either, that there will be a "New" Defender,...and I reckon We'll know about it in 2018.
    Who will be right,...You, or me?,....As they say, "Time Will Tell"!
    Pickles.

  2. #322
    MrLandy Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by DiscoMick View Post
    In the latest LROI John Pearson said he was told by a JLR insider recently that the new Defender would be delayed until 2020 after the directors rejected the proposal as being too much like a Range Rover and told the designers to come up with something more like a Defender. Interesting...
    I'd rather they delayed to get it right than hurried and botched it.

    Sent from my SM-G900I using AULRO mobile app
    See what I mean, the designers have no idea. They will be proposing all sorts of lame / fancy ideas, when they simply should be focussing on rebuilding /modernising the Defender in exactly the same proportions with a few minor interior tweaks to accomodate bigger bodies. The exterior dimensions should remain exactly the same. ...then we may see pre 2016 Defender prices come down. But they won't because they don't have any designers who understand the beauty of simplicity, or what a basic work vehicle needs to be. The culture at Land Rover now is for gizmos not grit.

  3. #323
    MrLandy Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Pickles2 View Post
    No worries.
    I wish that you were right, because I don't want another vehicle named "Defender" either,...I think that the models we have "stand for something", and I think that any "New" Defender will be different, a bit removed from what we now have.
    So, I think that there should be a new name for for the "new" vehicle, to distinguish it from the old generation Defender.
    However, I believe, and remember I don't want it either, that there will be a "New" Defender,...and I reckon We'll know about it in 2018.
    Who will be right,...You, or me?,....As they say, "Time Will Tell"!
    Pickles.
    Cheers Pickles, I reckon time is already telling. It has been for years now. All the focus has been on luxury models. ...2020 at the earliest, but that design will most likely be rejected too. Long live Defender, get one while you still can!

  4. #324
    MrLandy Guest
    PS: there are still plenty of Defenders on carsales with low kms, heaps of extras for reasonable prices IMO. Some are crazy high, but most simply reflect the reality that demand will grow as there is no more supply. Interestingly prices are now comparable with Toyota Troopy prices, which is probably closer to what they should always have been.

  5. #325
    Tombie Guest
    Good grief.

  6. #326
    cuppabillytea's Avatar
    cuppabillytea is offline Loud Mouthed Rat Bag Gold Subscriber
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Lillyfield NSW
    Posts
    7,828
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Tombie View Post
    Good grief.
    X2.
    Cheers, Billy.
    Keeping it simple is complicated.

  7. #327
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Illawarra
    Posts
    2,508
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Just wondering how can-am can get away calling their Atv a defender?

    Also babs, sorry to see you go, good luck in finding a suitable defender to do a heart transplant to

  8. #328
    Didge Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by MrLandy View Post
    See what I mean, the designers have no idea. ...... in exactly the same proportions with a few minor interior tweaks to accomodate bigger bodies. The exterior dimensions should remain exactly the same. ........
    Well, MrLandy, I don't know about exactly the same proportions. Firstly, I'd like to see the B pillars further back, a higher windscreen, no water leaks whatsoever, some sound insulation, better handbrake and window winder placements, quieter, internal padded roll cage or body that will retain it's shape in the event of a rollover, internal airbags, better rear seat positions, the wings should open with the bonnet so we can access that wasted area, etc, etc. There are heaps of improvements that could be made for little or no extra cost. Merc and Toyota are able to produce cars of a similar shape that have addressed all the above yet JLR state we can't have airbags due to the current shape - why?

  9. #329
    Babs Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by frantic View Post
    Just wondering how can-am can get away calling their Atv a defender? Also babs, sorry to see you go, good luck in finding a suitable defender to do a heart transplant to
    Cheers Frantic,

    I definitely want to do that transplant, though no rush.

    Also I won't be leaving the forum, it looks like I have a new SDV6 D4 lined up, so I'll still be hanging around.

    Sent from my iPhone using Forum Runner

  10. #330
    Tombie Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Didge View Post
    Well, MrLandy, I don't know about exactly the same proportions. Firstly, I'd like to see the B pillars further back, a higher windscreen, no water leaks whatsoever, some sound insulation, better handbrake and window winder placements, quieter, internal padded roll cage or body that will retain it's shape in the event of a rollover, internal airbags, better rear seat positions, the wings should open with the bonnet so we can access that wasted area, etc, etc. There are heaps of improvements that could be made for little or no extra cost. Merc and Toyota are able to produce cars of a similar shape that have addressed all the above yet JLR state we can't have airbags due to the current shape - why?


    Steering wheel position along with firewall construction and positioning are the key reasons we can't SRS a Defender.

    To re-tool all of that up is a very expensive task.

    As is the job of tooling up to move everything around/back etc. a big expense.

    Then it would leave you with a smaller cargo area as the C pillar and seats would have to go back, the pillars would need to be tripled in size to have strength, the body would need widening as the tunnel prevents moving the hand brake effectively (if the cubby was smaller and it was there people would complain about the small cubby). And the rear cargo area would shrink as the cabin pushed back. This would then need the wheelbase increased to allow for wheel arch to go further back and the entire chassis would need to be stretched in the middle about 4-6 inches.

    Toyota was lucky - their steering column is in the correct placement and had sufficient room to adjust for SRS bags to be fitted. They required very few changes to achieve and had volume sales to back it up.

Page 33 of 116 FirstFirst ... 2331323334354383 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!