Page 14 of 22 FirstFirst ... 41213141516 ... LastLast
Results 131 to 140 of 219

Thread: 2.2 TDCi (Puma) CAT Delete

  1. #131
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Sydney NSW
    Posts
    971
    Total Downloaded
    0
    With a free flowing exhaust the power comes on a tad earlier and boost holds steady at 22 psi under full throttle, there is no boost fluctuation at all. Torque band is increased over the rev range and there isnt any need to rev the thing harder than 3000rpm as at this point the engine really isnt making any more power.
    The snorkel isnt a power upgrade but rather peace of mind as you can do water crossings and cause it sits higher less dust to be sucked in.
    The biggest power mod is a remap and to compliment it for the purpose pf being reliable i recomend a intercooler. If you read my EGT thread there is a bunch of actual data in there to back up what im saying. Think of it as me spending a sht load of money on R and D that you can benefit from.

  2. #132
    DiscoMick Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by martnH View Post
    So which one is better?
    Decat vs. cold air intake

    It is well documented that a snorkel will rob engine performance

    I was thinking of getting a three way valve...You know with a lever.
    Going off-road, air via snorkel
    Going highway, air via cold air intake.

    Cat stay alive!

    Cheers
    That's interesting. I have heard it argued that a snorkel improves cold air intake. No idea if that's true or not.

  3. #133
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    AU
    Posts
    643
    Total Downloaded
    0
    What I did is to shorten the snorkel and I find this resulted in noticeable power gain , turbo spools up faster and lower egt.

    In other words, when I first installed the snorkel, the snorkel rob the engine a few horsepower and now by partially remove the snorkel and improve the ease of air going into the motor, I regain that lost performance.

    So i throw out the argument that maybe the removal of long snorkel can achiece better engine performance gain compared to killing the cat, given that puma is a big cat afterall.

    Killing cat will upset the puma


    Jokes aside, Peter at BAS have done some experiments with dyno graphs showing a snorkel will reduce horsepower. So what I have done here is really the best of both worlds, when off-road I connect the snorkel for engine protection, while on-road, I remove the snorkel for better engine performance

  4. #134
    Tombie Guest
    Those snorkels are the worst for flow out of all snorkels on the Defenders.
    The BAS power tests were done tuned.

    Did you test connected and disconnected at full operating temperature in the same area during the same weather conditions?2.2 TDCi (Puma) CAT Delete

    And you still haven’t solved the Issues the Cat removal is done for....
    Cooler floor, cooler handbrake and quicker spool...

  5. #135
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    1,801
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by martnH View Post
    So what I have done here is really the best of both worlds, when off-road I connect the snorkel for engine protection, while on-road, I remove the snorkel for better engine performance
    True but you could do better. If you can, go out of the wing top opening and put the factory grill back on the side opening to let air flow out of the engine bay. Then when wading, run a hose from wing top outlet to snorkel extension.

    Snorkels that mount to the side intake do restrict air flow, even the factory attachment that fits to the side vent is a bit rubbish. That said only worth looking at if your tuning up.

    Pic attached gives you the idea

  6. #136
    Simeon Guest

    Pro’s and Con’s

    Any intake can be ‘tuned’ by lengthening or shortening the induction path but there are always limits. Pro’s include cool (denser) air, the ‘tuning effect’, the ‘ram’ effect and relatively reduced dust but cons are the potentially reduced airflow due to static air and back pressure within a long, thin snorkel. This will vary greatly depending upon the individual engine. Unfortunately the designed length may not suit all of these attributes so without some kind of objective testing you will never know.

  7. #137
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    AU
    Posts
    643
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Tombie View Post
    Those snorkels are the worst for flow out of all snorkels on the Defenders.
    The BAS power tests were done tuned.

    Did you test connected and disconnected at full operating temperature in the same area during the same weather conditions?2.2 TDCi (Puma) CAT Delete

    And you still haven’t solved the Issues the Cat removal is done for....
    Cooler floor, cooler handbrake and quicker spool...
    I have quicker spool too by removing the snorkel tube

    With regards to the hot floor and hot handbrake...
    I will argue these are very similar to health raditiaon physiotherapy.

    The heat transmitted via the handbrake will increase blood circulation of driver, particularly the lower limbs which promotes healing and relaxing of muscles.This is very beneficial for long distance driving. (Thanks caveat is you will need to hydrate and if you have varicose veins, heat will worsen this condition

    Also quote"
    -Heat can improve the flexibility of tendons and ligaments
    -Heat will reduce muscle spasms
    -Heat may alleviate pain (heat may induce the release of endorphins, powerful opiate-like chemicals which block pain transmission.)
    Heat will elevate blood flow (heat tends to relax the walls of blood vessels)
    Heat will boost metabolism.Heat can help when stretching muscles and increasing overall flexibility."

  8. #138
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    AU
    Posts
    643
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I can't edit...I meant to say
    Heat physiotherapy

  9. #139
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    West Leederville
    Posts
    160
    Total Downloaded
    0
    getting a bit off topic here, but i believe JLRs narrow hodge-podge intake ducting would render any "ram-air" type effect pretty redundant. At best, removing a snorkel is surely just going back to factory-spec, so not really a "gain" by definition

  10. #140
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    352
    Total Downloaded
    0

    I can attest to that

    Quote Originally Posted by ninetubes View Post
    getting a bit off topic here, but i believe JLRs narrow hodge-podge intake ducting would render any "ram-air" type effect pretty redundant. At best, removing a snorkel is surely just going back to factory-spec, so not really a "gain" by definition
    I have replaced JLR's intake ducting system with nugget ducting and I am happy with from a performance point of view. I plan to wrap the exhaust like i did with my old truck and use heat shield to workaround the cabin heat issue. Personally DE-CAT is off the menu for me.

    Consider nugget ducting upgrade first up, before hacking into the CAT IMHO.

    pd

Page 14 of 22 FirstFirst ... 41213141516 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!