Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 32

Thread: Defender Puma 130 Head Gasket, Head & Turbo Failure

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    433
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Defender Puma 130 Head Gasket, Head & Turbo Failure

    Hi All

    Gotta say I am pretty miffed at the whole defender experience.
    I have a 2012 Defender 130, dual cab. 88,000 kms on the clock.
    Had 4 weeks long service leave booked, 3 days in the engine over heated.
    It was towed to Dubbo Land Rover, a faulty thermostat was diagnosed & replaced.

    It was using a fair amount of fuel 15 Litres/100km @ a steady 100 km/hr loaded but not too much <600kg estimated.
    It was alos using a bit of oil over 1 litre a 1000 km.

    Busted Landy.jpg

    Continued on our way overheated again. 3 hours drive in.
    Pulled the pin and drove it back to Melbourne slowly watching the temp all the way. Using BAS phone app guage, dash gauge is too normalized.
    Still overheated a couple of times. I know wrong thing to do. But I would have had to pay for a tow, accommodation and regional air fares
    and transfers, so it was a gamble as to further damage. We had been sitting around in hotels for a week and everyone wanted to go home by now.

    Anyway it is back at the mechanics and the head and been removed and it has been hardness tested and is below the minimum parameter so need a new head, the turbo is also stuffed
    with a lot of axial play in the shaft & oil leaks.

    I was running a BAS 170 tune. But I am pretty gentle with it.

    It been overheated twice before a faulty leaking OE radiator and again with an leaky oil cooler. Warranty both times.

    I have authorized the mechanic to get the thing all fixed as the vehicle is very useful to us.

    Am I just unlucky? Is the earlier overheating episodes a major contributor to the the cause this time?
    Do the turbo's fail much on these?
    I thought the motors in these where reasonably reliable, but a few failures but not excessive amounts?

    I want to keep it as it is set up for us, but these failures are difficult to tolerate.

    Clive

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Sydney NSW
    Posts
    971
    Total Downloaded
    0
    The 2.4 does seem to be a little more susceptible to cooling and head issues compared to the 2.2 going by reports.

    What's it costing to fix?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    433
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Somewhere around 11k as an early estimate

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Sydney NSW
    Posts
    971
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by clive22 View Post
    Somewhere around 11k as an early estimate
    Mate I had a alive tune and a mountain of mods. I believe that running a tune you need to free up exhaust flow. It helps keep egts under control and let's the motor breath easier. My theory is that running hotter egts over time is what has probably caused the head gasket to go on your vehicle and some others that are pushed hard when in standard tune.

    If you get a minute read through this: Puma 2.2 Egt's

    It's a lot of decent info and money spent to get that information and back it up with factual numbers (and the egt gauge set up is in the most accurate location; upstream of turbo), so the numbers are as accurate as can be!

  5. #5
    alien's Avatar
    alien is offline A Keeper of the TGO Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Bacchus Marsh Vic.
    Posts
    3,337
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 1nando View Post
    Mate I had a alive tune and a mountain of mods. I believe that running a tune you need to free up exhaust flow. It helps keep egts under control and let's the motor breath easier. My theory is that running hotter egts over time is what has probably caused the head gasket to go on your vehicle and some others that are pushed hard when in standard tune.

    If you get a minute read through this: Puma 2.2 Egt's

    It's a lot of decent info and money spent to get that information and back it up with factual numbers (and the egt gauge set up in the most accurate location; upstream of turbo), so the numbers are as accurate as can be!
    Any chance of a link that doesn’t require tapatalk?
    Cheers, Kyle



    The Good Oil.
    When did you last visit?
    http://www.aulro.com/afvb/good-oil/



  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Sydney NSW
    Posts
    971
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by alien View Post
    Any chance of a link that doesn’t require tapatalk?
    Puma 2.2 Egt's

    Hopefully this works.

  7. #7
    alien's Avatar
    alien is offline A Keeper of the TGO Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Bacchus Marsh Vic.
    Posts
    3,337
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 1nando View Post
    Puma 2.2 Egt's

    Hopefully this works.
    Link works, time for a read. Thank you.
    Cheers, Kyle



    The Good Oil.
    When did you last visit?
    http://www.aulro.com/afvb/good-oil/



  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    The Hills.
    Posts
    19,161
    Total Downloaded
    152.79 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by clive22 View Post
    Somewhere around 11k as an early estimate
    11k? Have a chat with Glenn ( Grinna1965 ). He puts the Ranger 3.2 into Puma Deefers. Of course it won't be cheaper, but it might be better. Worth a look.

    3.2L Ford Ranger Engine in a Land Rover Defender!!!!!! - YouTube
    ​JayTee

    Nullus Anxietus

    Cancer is gender blind.

    2000 D2 TD5 Auto: Tins
    1994 D1 300TDi Manual: Dave
    1980 SIII Petrol Tray: Doris
    OKApotamus #74
    Nanocom, D2 TD5 only.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Warner Area - SEQ
    Posts
    1,924
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Question

    Quote Originally Posted by 1nando View Post
    The 2.4 does seem to be a little more susceptible to cooling and head issues compared to the 2.2 going by reports.

    What's it costing to fix?
    being a 2012 model isn't that more likely to the be the 2.2 and not the 2.4?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    433
    Total Downloaded
    0
    It’s the 2.2. Early one

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!