Page 463 of 480 FirstFirst ... 363413453461462463464465473 ... LastLast
Results 4,621 to 4,630 of 4796

Thread: EV general discussion

  1. #4621
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Narre Warren South
    Posts
    6,911
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by DoubleChevron View Post
    I love 2strokes ... but I can't understand how they would meet any standards ... you are literally burning oil in them. Maybe they have somehow dry sumped them and run a standard oil filled crankcase (though I can't quite understand how).
    NVT (Norton Villiers Triumph) developed a stepped piston twin cylinder two stroke (the Wulf) with four stroke lubrication.
    Unfortunately not a success mainly due to financial issues, but could have been developed further.

    The lower part of the piston on one cylinder supplied the mixture to the other cylinder as below.



    Bernard Hooper did take the project further.

    STEPPED PISTON ENGINE OPERATING PRINCIPLE

    Colin
    '56 Series 1 with homemade welder
    '65 Series IIa Dormobile
    '70 SIIa GS
    '76 SIII 88" (Isuzu C240)
    '81 SIII FFR
    '95 Defender Tanami
    Motorcycles :-
    Vincent Rapide, Panther M100, Norton BIG4, Electra & Navigator, Matchless G80C, Suzuki SV650

  2. #4622
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Ballarat,Vic,Aus
    Posts
    4,090
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by V8Ian View Post
    Detroit two stroke?
    I've never driven one (don't have a truck license for starters)... The sound is something else. Pretty sure my grandfather said he used to work on these. Do you think I could ever work out how to drive an old twin stick screamer .... It sure would be fun to try.
    Proper cars--
    '92 Range Rover 3.8V8 ... 5spd manual
    '85 Series II CX2500 GTi Turbo I :burnrubber:
    '63 ID19 x 2 :wheelchair:
    '72 DS21 ie 5spd pallas
    Modern Junk:
    '07 Poogoe 407 HDi 6spd manual :zzz:
    '11 Poogoe RCZ HDI 6spd manual

  3. #4623
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Avoca Beach
    Posts
    14,191
    Total Downloaded
    0
    In about 1973, I was on a tour near San Francisco on a roundie bus with a detroit diesel and manual transmission.
    The clutch failed and we were set for a 2-4 hour wait for service.
    The driver didn't have a clue so I showed him how to drive it without a clutch. Got back to the hotel pretty quickly with the driver thinking I was a magician.
    Still remember those sounds as well as the Commer Knocker. (that will sort the younguns from the crusties)
    Regards PhilipA

  4. #4624
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Ballarat,Vic,Aus
    Posts
    4,090
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by PhilipA View Post
    In about 1973, I was on a tour near San Francisco on a roundie bus with a detroit diesel and manual transmission.
    The clutch failed and we were set for a 2-4 hour wait for service.
    The driver didn't have a clue so I showed him how to drive it without a clutch. Got back to the hotel pretty quickly with the driver thinking I was a magician.
    Still remember those sounds as well as the Commer Knocker. (that will sort the younguns from the crusties)
    Regards PhilipA
    yeah the commer knocker is what my grandfather used to work on a lot. How could a trucky not know how to drive without a clutch? that is bizarre, once your moving in a truck you don't touch the clutch ... they are a crash box ... designed for shifting the gears without using the clutch. I thought every trucker loved the old road ranger boxes
    Proper cars--
    '92 Range Rover 3.8V8 ... 5spd manual
    '85 Series II CX2500 GTi Turbo I :burnrubber:
    '63 ID19 x 2 :wheelchair:
    '72 DS21 ie 5spd pallas
    Modern Junk:
    '07 Poogoe 407 HDi 6spd manual :zzz:
    '11 Poogoe RCZ HDI 6spd manual

  5. #4625
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Back down the hill.
    Posts
    30,113
    Total Downloaded
    0
    RoadRanger is not a crash box, it's a constant mesh variety.
    If you don't like trucks, stop buying stuff.
    http://www.aulro.com/afvb/signaturepics/sigpic20865_1.gif

  6. #4626
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Ballarat,Vic,Aus
    Posts
    4,090
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by V8Ian View Post
    RoadRanger is not a crash box, it's a constant mesh variety.
    Have you ever heard me trying to drive one
    Proper cars--
    '92 Range Rover 3.8V8 ... 5spd manual
    '85 Series II CX2500 GTi Turbo I :burnrubber:
    '63 ID19 x 2 :wheelchair:
    '72 DS21 ie 5spd pallas
    Modern Junk:
    '07 Poogoe 407 HDi 6spd manual :zzz:
    '11 Poogoe RCZ HDI 6spd manual

  7. #4627
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    The Hills.
    Posts
    20,071
    Total Downloaded
    152.79 MB

    All batteries are created equal

    But some are more equal than others.

    There are a couple in the series.

    Then there's this:



    Pretty boxes are not really an indication of quality.
    ​JayTee

    Nullus Anxietus

    Cancer is gender blind.

    2000 D2 TD5 Auto: Tins
    1994 D1 300TDi Manual: Dave
    1980 SIII Petrol Tray: Doris
    OKApotamus #74
    Nanocom, D2 TD5 only.

  8. #4628
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    5,893
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by DoubleChevron View Post

    What is your point. Are you saying you should be able to decide what sort of car your neighbour buys. I'd love to live next door to you so I could tell you exactly what I thought of your opinions on what I personaly should buy. Hang on, don't you own a twin cab ute. Say your not religious are you? That is way most religious nutters live, they want to tell everyone else how they should live there life, while not doing what they say themselves.

    You obviously very much do care what other people buy, you sure spend a lot of time explaining to everyone why "everyone else" is stupid for doing exactly what you have done yourself. Yes "transport" is about 20% (of 1% of pollution) for autralia. This includes, shipping, trains, planes, trucks... all of transport. Personal cars would be a tiny percentage of this. They are very careful not to seperate this out from the "tranport" figure as it would show how ridiculous this electric throw-away caper is.
    Nope. Nope. I don't care what anyone buys. I don't care what my neighbour buys. I don't really care what any individual buys. What I care about is the mess we're making for ourselves. Despite what you think Austalians are buying, the data says that all we are buying now is 4x4's and SUVs. I concede that some cars on this list are really just boxy wagons.

    If we have any hope of meeting our climate targets it's likely we will have to pay to remove these cars from the road before their economic lives are out. Personally I'd rather people that didn't really need them didn't buy them so that people that actually needed them could have uninhibited access to them.

    I believe you're delusional if you think the needs of Australian motorists is so different now to 20 years ago. For that once or twice a year when we needed to take a load to the dump, or go camping/holidaying - we had a thing called a box trailer. What an idea! Ours was bright yellow! You could even let the rubbish pile up for weeks before a dump run, and use shovels in it and not worry about the paint. Glorious.

    The whole reason NVES exists is because so many people are buying large inefficient cars who never use them for anything other than driving around the city. The same things that not very long ago they managed perfectly well with sedans and wagons. NVES puts some of the responsibility for this mess back on the car makers who IMHO are very largely responsible. They've encouraged us to buy these things, now they can help find a solution to the problem. I wish NVES was more aggressive. The only people who would feel the pain is car makers who I've no sympathy for.

    Look at that 2005 list. Half of the cars are what we would call "small" cars by todays standards.

    Check 1985. Not a 4x4 or dual cab to be seen. Yet we had boats, Caravans etc etc.

    So yes, when I see a family where all the cars are 4x4's or dual cabs I'm going to thing they are taking the proverbial and judge them for that choice. When I see a shiny DC with not a mark on it and nothing in the tray driving around the city, I'm going to judge them too. Sorry, not sorry. Yes many cars are bought as statements about how people want to be perceived. This is not new - but advertising has been so successful that 4x4/DC now fill that role.


    2025

    1. Ford Ranger ute – 56,555 (-9.6%)
    2. Toyota RAV4 medium SUV – 51,947 (-11.5%)
    3. Toyota HiLux ute – 51,297 (-4.1%)
    4. Isuzu D-Max ute – 26,839 (-11.1%)
    5. Ford Everest large SUV – 26,161 (-1.3%)
    6. Toyota LandCruiser Prado large SUV – 26,106 (+166.3%)
    7. Hyundai Kona small SUV – 22,769 (+31.1%)
    8. Mazda CX-5 medium SUV – 22,742 (-0.4%)
    9. Mitsubishi Outlander medium SUV – 22,459 (-18.7%)
    10. Tesla Model Y medium SUV – 22,239 (+4.6%)


    2005

    1 Holden Commodore – 66,794

    2 Ford Falcon – 53,080

    3 Toyota Corolla – 46,415

    4 Toyota Camry – 34,492

    5 Holden Astra – 33,070

    6 Mazda 3 – 32,570

    7 Toyota HiLux – 31,369

    8 Holden Rodeo – 24,582

    9 Ford Territory – 23,454

    10 Holden Utility – 20,202

    11 Ford Falcon Ute – 18,384

    12 Nissan Pulsar – 17,643

    13 Honda Accord – 17,579

    14 Hyundai Getz – 16,455

    15 Toyota LandCruiser Prado – 15,335

    16 Toyota Echo – 15,180

    17 Mazda 6 – 14,783

    18 Mitsubishi Lancer – 13,641

    19 Hyundai Elantra – 13,353

    20 Subaru Forester – 12,320


    1985


    • Ford Falcon (76,818 units)
    • Holden Commodore (62,436 units)
    • Ford Laser-Meteor (35,479 units)
    • Toyota Corolla (28,269 units)
    • Mitsubishi Magna (26,902 units)
    • Holden Camira (24,395 units)
    • Toyota Corona-Camry (23,143 units)
    • Ford Telstar (20,982 units)
    • Nissan Pulsar (16,348 units)
    • Nissan Bluebird (15,528 units)
     2005 Defender 110 

  9. #4629
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    5,893
    Total Downloaded
    0
    In EV hews Hyundai have cut prices of all their EV's. I can't find a link but the Ioniq 5 has also been cut again! This is what NVES is supposed to do!

    Hyundai Inster deal sees $7000 slashed off baby EV | CarExpert
     2005 Defender 110 

  10. #4630
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Ballarat,Vic,Aus
    Posts
    4,090
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Captain_Rightfoot View Post
    Nope. Nope. I don't care what anyone buys. I don't care what my neighbour buys. I don't really care what any individual buys. What I care about is the mess we're making for ourselves. Despite what you think Austalians are buying, the data says that all we are buying now is 4x4's and SUVs. I concede that some cars on this list are really just boxy wagons.

    If we have any hope of meeting our climate targets it's likely we will have to pay to remove these cars from the road before their economic lives are out. Personally I'd rather people that didn't really need them didn't buy them so that people that actually needed them could have uninhibited access to them.

    I believe you're delusional if you think the needs of Australian motorists is so different now to 20 years ago. For that once or twice a year when we needed to take a load to the dump, or go camping/holidaying - we had a thing called a box trailer. What an idea! Ours was bright yellow! You could even let the rubbish pile up for weeks before a dump run, and use shovels in it and not worry about the paint. Glorious.

    The whole reason NVES exists is because so many people are buying large inefficient cars who never use them for anything other than driving around the city. The same things that not very long ago they managed perfectly well with sedans and wagons. NVES puts some of the responsibility for this mess back on the car makers who IMHO are very largely responsible. They've encouraged us to buy these things, now they can help find a solution to the problem. I wish NVES was more aggressive. The only people who would feel the pain is car makers who I've no sympathy for.

    Look at that 2005 list. Half of the cars are what we would call "small" cars by todays standards.

    Check 1985. Not a 4x4 or dual cab to be seen. Yet we had boats, Caravans etc etc.

    So yes, when I see a family where all the cars are 4x4's or dual cabs I'm going to thing they are taking the proverbial and judge them for that choice. When I see a shiny DC with not a mark on it and nothing in the tray driving around the city, I'm going to judge them too. Sorry, not sorry. Yes many cars are bought as statements about how people want to be perceived. This is not new - but advertising has been so successful that 4x4/DC now fill that role.


    2025

    1. Ford Ranger ute – 56,555 (-9.6%)
    2. Toyota RAV4 medium SUV – 51,947 (-11.5%)
    3. Toyota HiLux ute – 51,297 (-4.1%)
    4. Isuzu D-Max ute – 26,839 (-11.1%)
    5. Ford Everest large SUV – 26,161 (-1.3%)
    6. Toyota LandCruiser Prado large SUV – 26,106 (+166.3%)
    7. Hyundai Kona small SUV – 22,769 (+31.1%)
    8. Mazda CX-5 medium SUV – 22,742 (-0.4%)
    9. Mitsubishi Outlander medium SUV – 22,459 (-18.7%)
    10. Tesla Model Y medium SUV – 22,239 (+4.6%)


    2005

    1 Holden Commodore – 66,794

    2 Ford Falcon – 53,080

    3 Toyota Corolla – 46,415

    4 Toyota Camry – 34,492

    5 Holden Astra – 33,070

    6 Mazda 3 – 32,570

    7 Toyota HiLux – 31,369

    8 Holden Rodeo – 24,582

    9 Ford Territory – 23,454

    10 Holden Utility – 20,202

    11 Ford Falcon Ute – 18,384

    12 Nissan Pulsar – 17,643

    13 Honda Accord – 17,579

    14 Hyundai Getz – 16,455

    15 Toyota LandCruiser Prado – 15,335

    16 Toyota Echo – 15,180

    17 Mazda 6 – 14,783

    18 Mitsubishi Lancer – 13,641

    19 Hyundai Elantra – 13,353

    20 Subaru Forester – 12,320


    1985


    • Ford Falcon (76,818 units)
    • Holden Commodore (62,436 units)
    • Ford Laser-Meteor (35,479 units)
    • Toyota Corolla (28,269 units)
    • Mitsubishi Magna (26,902 units)
    • Holden Camira (24,395 units)
    • Toyota Corona-Camry (23,143 units)
    • Ford Telstar (20,982 units)
    • Nissan Pulsar (16,348 units)
    • Nissan Bluebird (15,528 units)
    It is interesting isn't it. Though reality is, all the little pretend 4wds (most of which are just jacked up front wheel drive hatchbacks) have replaced the passenger sedan and wagon. I never understood this until I had young kids. Those jacked up "SUVs" are incredibly functional. You can fit the big prams, baby crap in them. The kids seats have enough height to lift babies in and out of (yes I've slammed some babies/kids heads into cars roofs).

    I'm been "sort of" looking for any interesting big comfy 4 door sedan for a couple of months .... I tell you they just don't exist, even when your starting to look at 15year old cars.

    It is what it is. The "small car" these days, it pretty much near as big and heavy as a passenger sedan from the 80s/90s. There is a lot of tech (a lot of it crumple zones, air bags and safety structures) built into those modern cars. so they are slowly growing with each iteration.

    Its a different era, all the baby boomers have since retired and purchased big caravans and boats. Back then only the very wealthy tended to own big heavy caravans (the norm today) and boats. Those people owned range rovers, F150 or old dodge trucks if they were poor. Different times.
    Proper cars--
    '92 Range Rover 3.8V8 ... 5spd manual
    '85 Series II CX2500 GTi Turbo I :burnrubber:
    '63 ID19 x 2 :wheelchair:
    '72 DS21 ie 5spd pallas
    Modern Junk:
    '07 Poogoe 407 HDi 6spd manual :zzz:
    '11 Poogoe RCZ HDI 6spd manual

Page 463 of 480 FirstFirst ... 363413453461462463464465473 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!