Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 21

Thread: 32s" vs axle damage

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    52
    Total Downloaded
    0

    32s" vs axle damage

    I know this has been done to death but I'm keen on hearing people's experiences with 32s on factory 24spline axles . Is it a lot of stress in them or with mechanical sympathy is it safe ?

    Sent from my HTC_0P6B using AULRO mobile app

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    St Helena,Melbourne
    Posts
    16,773
    Total Downloaded
    1.13 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by squidsd1 View Post
    I know this has been done to death but I'm keen on hearing people's experiences with 32s on factory 24spline axles . Is it a lot of stress in them or with mechanical sympathy is it safe ?

    Sent from my HTC_0P6B using AULRO mobile app
    In the last 8 years of ownership i have gone from stock 235/70's to 245/70's to 265/70 muds and now 265/75 muds and have never broken an axle or CV joint.
    Even in my 2 previous RRC's on 10 splines i had never broken anything on 265/70's or 31/10.5's , all that over a 20 year period so mechanical sympathy goes a long way to longevity.
    MY08 TDV6 SE D3- permagrin ooh yeah
    2004 Jayco Freedom tin tent
    1998 Triumph Daytona T595
    1974 VW Kombi bus
    1958 Holden FC special sedan

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    St Helena,Melbourne
    Posts
    16,773
    Total Downloaded
    1.13 MB
    Its not the power, its the way its applied.
    A heavy boot will send shock loads thru the drive train and something will give, an auto will cushion the load to an extent but there are still plenty here that have broken axles or cv joints with stock power trains.
    MY08 TDV6 SE D3- permagrin ooh yeah
    2004 Jayco Freedom tin tent
    1998 Triumph Daytona T595
    1974 VW Kombi bus
    1958 Holden FC special sedan

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    13,786
    Total Downloaded
    0
    If you only drive around on road then your comments hold and bigger wheels are more likely to stress the clutch and gearbox than axles.

    However offroad, the bigger the wheels, the more mass, momentum and torque (/moment) is acting on the axle. Think of a big wheel spinning and stopping suddenly on ground contact, or driving up against a step that tries to oppose motion.

    I have seen the most careful drivers in the world break rover axles when running big tyres. Even a stock na diesel puts out enough torque in 1st low to snap axles if you had perfect traction.

    That said, 32's should be OK if unlocked. Even though disco/rrc 24 spliners are made of cheese...
    Last edited by Mick_Marsh; 24th November 2014 at 10:12 PM. Reason: Removed quote at OP's request

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    13,786
    Total Downloaded
    0
    It was not a personal attack, sorry if you took it that way. Your statements are 100% wrong though. Anyone who has done high school physics can demonstrate that bigger wheels put more stress on axles.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Living the dream!
    Posts
    1,076
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by squidsd1 View Post
    I know this has been done to death but I'm keen on hearing people's experiences with 32s on factory 24spline axles . Is it a lot of stress in them or with mechanical sympathy is it safe ?

    Sent from my HTC_0P6B using AULRO mobile app
    My experiences

    300 Tdi Manual, rear locked, front unlocked, 32' BFG old style muddies
    "Jase" intercooler and fuel turned up.
    No breakages in 4 years, but when I upgraded the CV's were all but thrashed.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    13,786
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Ashcroft's testing showed that a stock 24 spline rear will snap at around 3358 ft.lbs of torque. A stock 3.5 rrc v8 can produce about 10500 ft.lbs of torque at the wheels in first low.

    Now anyone who says that is *always* divided by 4 axle shafts does not know what serious off-roading is in my book.
    Last edited by Mick_Marsh; 24th November 2014 at 10:10 PM. Reason: Removed quote at OP's request

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,028
    Total Downloaded
    0
    The bigger tyres provide better traction and more leverage to allow higher torque input. Even with open diffs, with the center diff locked, 100% of the torque can be split to two wheels, which puts the math beyond the axle's strength. Nevermind the much weaker shafts where they go into the CV joints.

    Anyway, I've seen stock trucks break diffs, shafts and CV joints. My suggestion is if off roading carry spares shafts and a CV joint at least. They are pretty cheap to find.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Mundaring, WA
    Posts
    94
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by isuzurover View Post
    It was not a personal attack, sorry if you took it that way. Your statements are 100% wrong though. Anyone who has done high school physics can demonstrate that bigger wheels put more stress on axles.
    Nice apology then re-insult.!

    Anyone who's gone to school knows that your comments are a touch harsh.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    canberra
    Posts
    3,002
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I don't normally chime in on these discussions but from my experience its the hemisphere gears and cross pin that fails more so then axels in a rover diff I recon I have killed at least three diffs and only broken one rear axel ( ten spline ) and one front inner axel (24 spline)but the front I think was caused more so by the cv breaking and binding up. So far I have not broken a 24spline rear

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!