Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 24

Thread: 3.9l Extractors...gains worth it?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    220
    Total Downloaded
    0

    3.9l Extractors...gains worth it?

    G'Day All,
    My 97 S1 seems to become quite asmatic above 3500-4000rpm. It completely standard but Im considering getting a set of aftermarket extractors for it.

    Is there noticable gains to be had in the way of more power, free-er revving engine and better fuel economy or am I wasting my $'s if my std manifolds are still servicable?

    Any opinions would be good.

    Cheers,

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Kingston, Tassie, OZ.
    Posts
    13,728
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Rezley View Post
    G'Day All,
    My 97 S1 seems to become quite asmatic above 3500-4000rpm. It completely standard but Im considering getting a set of aftermarket extractors for it.

    Is there noticable gains to be had in the way of more power, free-er revving engine and better fuel economy or am I wasting my $'s if my std manifolds are still servicable?

    Any opinions would be good.

    Cheers,
    Definately leave the manifolds alone. You would be better off changing cams and port matching etc than fitting headers. The EFI manifolds flow plenty enough for a 3.9, even cammed and chipped they are still OK.
    Have you had a decent tune by someone who knows these engines yet? Ignition timing is important(10 Deg BTDC is a good start) and also check that the distributor mech advance isn't siezed. This will make these engines flat and unrevable, and is a fairly common problem.
    IF you go for headers, HM make a good set for the D1, by far the best quality for the $ I have seen, and the ports are very well finished too.

    JC
    The Isuzu 110. Solid and as dependable as a rock, coming soon with auto box😊
    The Range Rover L322 4.4.TTDV8 ....probably won't bother with the remap..😈

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Gold Coast Queensland Australia
    Posts
    6,469
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Rezley View Post
    G'Day All,
    My 97 S1 seems to become quite asmatic above 3500-4000rpm. It completely standard but Im considering getting a set of aftermarket extractors for it.

    Is there noticable gains to be had in the way of more power, free-er revving engine and better fuel economy or am I wasting my $'s if my std manifolds are still servicable?

    Any opinions would be good.

    Cheers,
    something is wrong with your tuning,
    i have a 95 3.9 auto and foot flat it runs past 6000 [which isn't on the tacho] every time,
    have a look at your tuning.
    don't **** with the factory manifolds, they work.

    and if you were to go with weeant extractors that don't do anything for your money, you will be weeded off with the extra noise from under the bonnet.
    Safe Travels
    harry

  4. #4
    mike 90 RR Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Rezley View Post
    G'Day All,
    My 97 S1 seems to become quite asthmatic above 3500-4000rpm. ....

    Any opinions would be good.
    If I was to pick on anything to cause this ... Exhaust wise ... It would be the catalytic converters ... & / or the internal condition of the muffler

    Mike

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Kingston, Tassie, OZ.
    Posts
    13,728
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by mike 90 RR View Post
    If I was to pick on anything to cause this ... Exhaust wise ... It would be the catalytic converters ... & / or the internal condition of the muffler

    Mike
    No Cats on our D1's Mike, but yes the main muffler on these has been known to drop baffles etc...

    JC
    The Isuzu 110. Solid and as dependable as a rock, coming soon with auto box😊
    The Range Rover L322 4.4.TTDV8 ....probably won't bother with the remap..😈

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    516
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I fitted Hurricane extractors to mine, mainly cause I had the opportunity to when the heads were off and because the manifold studs were had it on mine thanks to previous maintenance (rough mechanics)

    Didn't really chance my performance for good or bad, but made it sound a teeny bit better. Anyhow, I have this deep down desire to build an angry sounding engine for it at some stage, so I guess I've saved myself the hassle of doing the exhaust leading up to it.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    220
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Thank you to all for the replies. Looks like you've saved me $450-500 which I'll now put towards a decent tune up.
    Nothing beats personal experience.

    Cheers

  8. #8
    mike 90 RR Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by justinc View Post
    No Cats on our D1's Mike, but yes the main muffler on these has been known to drop baffles etc...

    JC
    I have been quite surprised about the "No Cats" fitted on the early unleaded models ... As I am use to seeing them on "other brands" that use this fuel (example ... Ford EA 1988)

    My understanding on the concept of the cats, is to super-heat the exhaust and burn off excess fuel & gases ... so they get rid of the rotten egg smell & to also help meet the emission's standards /// and for such thirsty engines, They met the standards without cats?? ..... ....


    and Yep ... I know of a couple of folks, in the past, that have had restrictions of the exhaust system due to the baffle coming loose and blocking the exhaust passage

    Mike

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    CROMER, NSW
    Posts
    2,048
    Total Downloaded
    0
    i had an outstanding result on my 4.0L carburetted V8 with a set of extractors.
    post fitment and rejetting of the carby's to suit, my 25yr old 110 had a new lease of life, then i had the gearbox rebuilt!!!
    LAND ROVER;
    HELPING PUT OIL BACK IN THE GROUND FOR 70 YEARS
    CARS DON'T GET ANY "GREENER" THAT.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Adelaide - Torrens Park
    Posts
    7,291
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by mike 90 RR View Post
    I have been quite surprised about the "No Cats" fitted on the early unleaded models ... As I am use to seeing them on "other brands" that use this fuel (example ... Ford EA 1988)

    My understanding on the concept of the cats, is to super-heat the exhaust and burn off excess fuel & gases ... so they get rid of the rotten egg smell & to also help meet the emission's standards /// and for such thirsty engines, They met the standards without cats?? ..... ....

    I think you will find that Discovery Series Is were imported and complied as something other than passenger vehicles, therefore didn't have to meet such strict emission standards as normal sedans did.

    I believe the same thing applies to Classic Range Rovers.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!