Page 9 of 11 FirstFirst ... 7891011 LastLast
Results 81 to 90 of 108

Thread: Disco D2 TD5 Diesel Fuel economy

  1. #81
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Coogee NSW
    Posts
    545
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Yeah I know it's seems hard to believe but theys were the numbers.

    I don't know the physics but others report increased boost equals better mileage,

    110kmh on Cruise control except for a couple of the hills, back to 100kmh when I manually controlled the pedal to stay in T/C lockup and no kick downs.

    But it was only me in the car, and no load .

  2. #82
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Port Stephens N.S.W
    Posts
    3,158
    Total Downloaded
    0
    It's do-able ... and I might add ... I find that if I drive a little harder/faster on the open road, I get better economy. My wastegate is already wound up to around 19.7 peak.

    More boost ? Who knows, but the figures are pretty constant ... 85-95 gets me 24-25mpg ... 105-110 gets me 26-28mpg. (minimal use of cruise).
    Kev..

    Going ... going ... almost gone ... GONE !! ... 2004 D2a Td5 Auto "Classic Country" Vienna Green

    2014 MUX LST with fruit
    2015 Kimberley Kamper "Classic"

  3. #83
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Fremantle WA
    Posts
    3,839
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Fluids View Post
    It's do-able ... and I might add ... I find that if I drive a little harder/faster on the open road, I get better economy. My wastegate is already wound up to around 19.7 peak.

    More boost ? Who knows, but the figures are pretty constant ... 85-95 gets me 24-25mpg ... 105-110 gets me 26-28mpg. (minimal use of cruise).
    Better mileage because you get there quicker, therefore the engine is running for less time - GRIN

  4. #84
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Hunter Valley NSW
    Posts
    750
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by gavinwibrow View Post
    Better mileage because you get there quicker, therefore the engine is running for less time - GRIN
    Less time driving = less diesel has leaked from the fuel press reg or the fuel tank/filter pipes

  5. #85
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Orange, NSW
    Posts
    7,965
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I have the same model, i got to 760kms before i filled up and still had 20 litres left. I love my disco, runs great

  6. #86
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    sydney - pining for the western desert
    Posts
    444
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by northiam View Post
    How does turning up the boost improve mpg (increased power = increased fuel consumption)?
    More boost = more oxygen = fuller, cleaner burn = more power from the same amount of fuel.
    Therefore if you don't use the extra power & drive like you did before you should use less fuel.
    That's the theory anyway. The physics is OK but every time I increase power on any car I have I end up using the power & my fuel consumption climbs.
    Cheers,
    Alex

  7. #87
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Hobart, TAS
    Posts
    246
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Alex 110 View Post
    More boost = more oxygen = fuller, cleaner burn = more power from the same amount of fuel.
    Therefore if you don't use the extra power & drive like you did before you should use less fuel.
    That's the theory anyway. The physics is OK but every time I increase power on any car I have I end up using the power & my fuel consumption climbs.
    Cheers,
    Alex
    Whose theory is that????

    More oxygen requires more fuel------or you get lean mixture!!!! You need more of both to get more power! It can be a little lean or a little rich either way but too much of one or the other and you will achieve nothing / negative result / or engine damage.

    Any argument???

  8. #88
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    2,827
    Total Downloaded
    0
    [quote]
    Quote Originally Posted by davrac

    Whose theory is that????

    More oxygen requires more fuel------or you get lean mixture!!!! You need more of both to get more power! It can be a little lean or a little rich either way but too much of one or the other and you will achieve nothing / negative result / or engine damage.

    Any argument???[/QUOTE
    No need to argue. You need to do bit of reading to understand your diesel.

    Plenty of posts and threads already here, so no need for anyone to start from scratch.
    Cheers

  9. #89
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Coogee NSW
    Posts
    545
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Alex 110 View Post
    More boost = more oxygen = fuller, cleaner burn = more power from the same amount of fuel.
    Therefore if you don't use the extra power & drive like you did before you should use less fuel.
    That's the theory anyway. The physics is OK but every time I increase power on any car I have I end up using the power & my fuel consumption climbs.
    Cheers,
    Alex
    D

    Me thinks Alex was hinting at "volumetric efficiency".

  10. #90
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    West Pennant Hills
    Posts
    469
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Fluids View Post
    ... 85-95 gets me 24-25mpg ... 105-110 gets me 26-28mpg. (minimal use of cruise).
    I don't know about the impact of waste gate pressure on fuel economy but at higher speeds, going faster isn't going to get you better fuel economy.

    Wind resistance (and a number of other energy consuming factors) is proportional to the square of the speed. Wind drag doesn't make a great difference below 60kph due to the other factors but over that it starts to make a big difference, especially for a brick like a disco. At 110kph the drag is 67% greater than for 85kph. You may recall the Top Gear Veyron video where at 150mph they needed 200hp but at top speed of 250mph it needed 1000hp and only had fuel for 12 minutes.

    The energy used to accelerate to a given speed is also proportional to the square of the speed.

    Thus at elevated speeds, better fuel economy is likely to be more due to driving technique, hills and traffic and not to the speed itself.

Page 9 of 11 FirstFirst ... 7891011 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!