-
15th November 2013, 08:09 PM
#1
Throttle position sensor testing
Hi, anyone know the procedure to confirm a good tps sensor, or what tests can be done. My mates td5 auto has a very responsive throttle when you tap it as apposed to mine which isn't the best, not surevifvits an auto thing?? I've changed glow plugs which made a difference and keep the filters changed etc
Cheers
Bronson
-
16th November 2013, 09:15 AM
#2
TPS or ECU remapped?
Are both vehicles to the same spec? If your mate has a remapped ECU and you don't then the throttle response will be vastly different. Unfortunately, it's not as simple as swapping ECUs, as the injectors are keyed in for each engine, (they have balance values that basically ensure that the ECU compensates for any manufacturing differences in flow rates etc to ensure that you get a smooth engine). A swap may work to determine why there is a difference, but the engine may be rough at idle etc.
To test the TPS, you need a diagnostic tool like the nanocom or hawkeye.
-
16th November 2013, 12:04 PM
#3
[QUOTE=bsperka;2029001]Are both vehicles to the same spec? If your mate has a remapped ECU and you don't then the throttle response will be vastly different. Unfortunately, it's not as simple as swapping ECUs, as the injectors are keyed in for each engine, (they have balance values that basically ensure that the ECU compensates for any manufacturing differences in flow rates etc to ensure that you get a smooth engine). A swap may work to determine why there is a difference, but the engine may be rough at idle etc.
To test the TPS, you need a diagnostic tool like the nanocom or hawkeye.[/QUOTE
Mine is a Trs ecu manual with all the extras, my mates is a stock standard auto. I've set all mine up correctly with inj codes etc, although I realised his is far more responsive when you tap the go pedal at idle.
I do have a nanocom, but a little unsure what needs to be done to test the TPS. Maybe the guaze is blocked on the fuel pressure reg??? Or something else needs attention????
Cheers
Bronson
-
16th November 2013, 07:29 PM
#4
Not sure of your year models but I am sure the earlier td5's had a sharper response. Changed in the later models to reduce the bunnyhop effect when in low range low speed stuff.
Dave
-
16th November 2013, 09:52 PM
#5
Mine is a 1999 vs his 2001
-
17th November 2013, 06:44 AM
#6
Have a look here for a testing method....
http://www.aulro.com/afvb/electronic...-d2-td5-2.html
I was actually messing around graphing throttle pedal response yesterday and noticed that the recordings I'd done when I had the 2-way throttle/MSB ECU had a longer "dead spot" than the 3-way/NNN/remap. If your mate has a 2002MY disco that might be a partial explanation.
cheers
Paul
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
|
Search All the Web!
|
Bookmarks