Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 22

Thread: 235/75r16 land rover discovery 2

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    15
    Total Downloaded
    0
    thanks for all feedback

    i am thinking to go to bf goodrich at, because the cooper don't have snowflake symbol, and for insurance company if i have an accident this could be a problem.

    in this moment i have fitted in my car 255/65r16 and if i go to bf goodrich online they give me 2 sizes 255/65r16 or 265/65r16, but i want a 235/70r16 why they don't show this tires 235, 245...i can fit, right?

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,029
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Note only some sizes of the BFG AT have the snowflake symbol. you should check out the Goodyear Duratrac. Wrangler DuraTrac Tires | Goodyear Tires Canada Greta all around tire and it has the snowflake symbol. Quite a bit better in the winter than the BFG.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Brisbane West
    Posts
    7,373
    Total Downloaded
    0
    245/75/16 is a better offroad tyre than 255/70/16 especially on sand. Get it in an LT carcass. Cheers

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Kiwiland
    Posts
    7,246
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Red90 View Post
    Note only some sizes of the BFG AT have the snowflake symbol. you should check out the Goodyear Duratrac. Wrangler DuraTrac Tires | Goodyear Tires Canada Greta all around tire and it has the snowflake symbol. Quite a bit better in the winter than the BFG.
    I have duratrac in 215/85r16 for my go play in the snow tyres. Very good but lots more drag on road than Bfg at.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,029
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Drag on the road? Where do you get that?

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Kiwiland
    Posts
    7,246
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Red90 View Post
    Drag on the road? Where do you get that?
    Drag as in slows you down pretty quick if you put it in neutral.
    Not drag add in drag - race.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,029
    Total Downloaded
    0
    They should not. They are just a normal tire. Rolling resistance should be not detectable. If you are slowing down detectably in neutral, there is something else wrong. These tires are no difference than any other road tire.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Kiwiland
    Posts
    7,246
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Red90 View Post
    They should not. They are just a normal tire. Rolling resistance should be not detectable. If you are slowing down detectably in neutral, there is something else wrong. These tires are no difference than any other road tire.
    I'm wondering if you've ever ridden a bike. Say a mountainbike with a variety of different tyres?
    If you had, you'd appreciate the difference tyres make.

    Tyre tread pattern and pressure makes massive differences to rolling resistance. This is why people get terrible fuel economy with mud tyres and better economy with bald tyres than new tyres.

    The Duratracs are significantly chunkier and have noticably more drag than the BFG A/T's. They are not far off in drag to the SAT radial retreads I used to run.
    They are not a road tyre, while not as chunky as most MT's, they are closer to a MT than any AT tyre and have a softer and more pliable rubber compound than most AT's.



    I have four sets of RRC wheels and tyres. In order of rolling resistance.

    1. Hankook RA07 (HT type road tyres) Lowest drag.
    2. Toyo tranpath ice/snow tyres.
    3. BFG A/T and Michelin XPC.
    Then a huge gap.
    4. Wrangler Duratrac.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,029
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Yes. I have been mountain biking for 30 years. There is a difference but not measurable on our application. Maybe in a Prius you would measure a one percent hit in mileage but not in a a Rover.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Kiwiland
    Posts
    7,246
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Red90 View Post
    Yes. I have been mountain biking for 30 years. There is a difference but not measurable on our application. Maybe in a Prius you would measure a one percent hit in mileage but not in a a Rover.
    It's not 1%. It's at least 10%.
    I'm finding it bizarre that someone on a 4wd forum would be denying there is a rolling resistance difference in tyres.

    On a bike the difference between almost slicks at 40psi and 2.5" tyres at 20psi is about 10km/h in cruising speed.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!