Page 7 of 8 FirstFirst ... 5678 LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 76

Thread: SLS problem doing my head in

  1. #61
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    west of Transylvania
    Posts
    3,783
    Total Downloaded
    0
    hawkeye must be upgraded to v.6 to calibrate, tell to the man with hawkeye that it's free... anyway what were the fault codes though?
    Discovery Td5 (2000), manual, tuned

  2. #62
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Victoria
    Posts
    216
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Both were historical.

    One was the exhaust valve as I had u plugged it to drive there.

    The other was left height sensor connection broken or short.

    I didn't get to write down the numbers quickly enough before they got cleared lol

    If I had a list I'm sure I could point them out! I'll ask if he can upgrade it lol

  3. #63
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    west of Transylvania
    Posts
    3,783
    Total Downloaded
    0
    The code numbers are irrelevant, that left height sensor code is the gist of it IMO, there's the probem on that circuit it's niot a calibration issue as long as it gets to normal level now and then
    Discovery Td5 (2000), manual, tuned

  4. #64
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Victoria
    Posts
    216
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Would I have been going crazy if I was wiggling the wiring loom that goes along the chassis, and seeing the left sensor height reading go from about 140 to 160?
    I don't think the compressor pumped during that time. Maybe a wire has rubbed through and is getting better connection when wiggled?

  5. #65
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    west of Transylvania
    Posts
    3,783
    Total Downloaded
    0
    The fault code and the symptom are both pointing to a problem on that sensor's circuit, you should get hold of a known good SLS chassis loom or rebuild the wiring, they used to make tricks in the sensor's plug too
    Discovery Td5 (2000), manual, tuned

  6. #66
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Victoria
    Posts
    216
    Total Downloaded
    0
    That doesn't sound fun to replace the full loom! I believe it does the fuel pump and other stuff too.
    Perhaps I could splice in a length of 3 core wire closer to the engine bay, being I thought I saw the wiggling down the back adjust it the reading.
    Stay tuned party people!

  7. #67
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Victoria
    Posts
    216
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Well, at this stage the car has been functioning and drivable for the last few days *touch wood*

    I'm not sure if it was clearing the codes with hawkeye (they were only historical), or a good proper wiggling of the wiring loom, but it's working.

    The two sides are sitting at different heights by a bit, I'm scared to calibrate using the nanocom in case that did corrupt things!

    I might still take it to a dealer, suck up the money it will cost and just get it done properly.

    Thanks for all the input everyone has offered so far!

  8. #68
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Branxton NSW
    Posts
    581
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Had u thought of bridging the signal wire from the known good sensor, across to the faulty sensor. The SLS ecu would see the same height from both sides then. And would rule out a rooted sensor.

    Might be time to get busy with the multimeter/test light and the soldering iron and make some repairs.

  9. #69
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Victoria
    Posts
    216
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Definitely not a faulty sensor as I had swapped in a known good one.

    I've know recalibrated using nanocom, so wasn't that either.

    I'm confident that the wiring loom is damaged, since giving it a good wiggle it's been faultless since. I need to complete a permanent fix and put new wiring in spliced up further up the harness.

  10. #70
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    west of Transylvania
    Posts
    3,783
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Doesnt seem a too good improvisation to me cos putting them in parallel might create a voltage drop as the sensors are working based on magnetic hall effect and the SLABS is very sensitive to the input while the sensor's output is very dependent on SLABS's internal resistance so the result could be an even level both sides(whichnis good) but lower than normal
    Discovery Td5 (2000), manual, tuned

Page 7 of 8 FirstFirst ... 5678 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!