Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst ... 34567 LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 65

Thread: 3.9 V8 petrol versus TD5

  1. #41
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    The Hills.
    Posts
    19,170
    Total Downloaded
    152.79 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by ozscott View Post
    Yea I agree with all that Tins.

    Cheers
    What? Even the 300TDi bit?
    ​JayTee

    Nullus Anxietus

    Cancer is gender blind.

    2000 D2 TD5 Auto: Tins
    1994 D1 300TDi Manual: Dave
    1980 SIII Petrol Tray: Doris
    OKApotamus #74
    Nanocom, D2 TD5 only.

  2. #42
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Brisbane West
    Posts
    7,372
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Tins View Post
    I think you mean 'track'. Wheelbase is measured front to rear, from axle centrelines. It is possibly the only thing the two cars have in common if you discount the main glass, and even that is different in tint.
    Yes I did mean wider track. Base was the same. As for common components probably the rear tailgate handle3.9 V8 petrol versus TD5

  3. #43
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Brisbane West
    Posts
    7,372
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Tins View Post
    What? Even the 300TDi bit?
    Yep I prefer the simplicity over the Td5 mate. I know how slow they are having driven a couple but in for a penny... Cheers

  4. #44
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Back down the hill.
    Posts
    29,769
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Tins View Post
    The TD5 is better on fuel than my Barra engined Fairmont, which makes it way better than a V8 Disco.
    That surprised me John. My Barra is heavier than yours, but I find each to be on par with normal economical (as opposed to anal economy) driving, with the edge going to the Barra. The Ford easier to improve or destroy average numbers. Both returned just under 30 mpg sensibly driven.

    BTW, I've improved the dash readout on the Range Rover from 11.5L/100k to 10.9 over the 4,000k I've driven it.
    If you don't like trucks, stop buying stuff.
    http://www.aulro.com/afvb/signaturepics/sigpic20865_1.gif

  5. #45
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Back down the hill.
    Posts
    29,769
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by ozscott View Post
    Yep I prefer the simplicity over the Td5 mate. I know how slow they are having driven a couple but in for a penny... Cheers
    Blknight can make the 300 march, but a pyrometer is essential along with its observance.
    If you don't like trucks, stop buying stuff.
    http://www.aulro.com/afvb/signaturepics/sigpic20865_1.gif

  6. #46
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    14,129
    Total Downloaded
    99.87 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by ozscott View Post
    Yes I did mean wider track. Base was the same. As for common components probably the rear tailgate handle3.9 V8 petrol versus TD5
    Even that is different! Actually thats the one part that the Disco1 did better.
    Cheers
    Slunnie


    ~ Discovery II Td5 ~ Discovery 3dr V8 ~ Series IIa 6cyl ute ~ Series II V8 ute ~

  7. #47
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Bundaberg Qld
    Posts
    7,036
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Tins View Post
    I think you mean 'track'. Wheelbase is measured front to rear, from axle centrelines. It is possibly the only thing the two cars have in common if you discount the main glass, and even that is different in tint.
    And the back door outer skin IIRC.

  8. #48
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    The Hills.
    Posts
    19,170
    Total Downloaded
    152.79 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by pop058 View Post
    And the back door outer skin IIRC.
    And those bloody clips that hold the headlights in. You'd think they might have changed those if they were so hell bent in "improvements".
    ​JayTee

    Nullus Anxietus

    Cancer is gender blind.

    2000 D2 TD5 Auto: Tins
    1994 D1 300TDi Manual: Dave
    1980 SIII Petrol Tray: Doris
    OKApotamus #74
    Nanocom, D2 TD5 only.

  9. #49
    Join Date
    Dec 2022
    Location
    On the Beach
    Posts
    13
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by discopete View Post
    If considering spending money on an engine conversion, why not keep D1 and buy the D2 for touring. Engine conversion would be at least 15K. On subject of conversions it's becoming popular to put the Td5 in a D1. Great tunable engine that sound fantastic and still return reasonable economy.

    Peter
    having two isnt really an option, it would have to be one or the other hence my dilemma..

    however that is a good option, has anyone here done the conversion of a TD5 into a D1?
    i get to keep my beloved unicorn of a D1 and have the TD5 goodness

  10. #50
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    The Hills.
    Posts
    19,170
    Total Downloaded
    152.79 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by Smileyx View Post
    having two isnt really an option, it would have to be one or the other hence my dilemma..

    however that is a good option, has anyone here done the conversion of a TD5 into a D1?
    i get to keep my beloved unicorn of a D1 and have the TD5 goodness
    Definitely been done in a RRC, which is nearly the same thing. It'd be good to have a donor car though. It's not just a bolt in.
    ​JayTee

    Nullus Anxietus

    Cancer is gender blind.

    2000 D2 TD5 Auto: Tins
    1994 D1 300TDi Manual: Dave
    1980 SIII Petrol Tray: Doris
    OKApotamus #74
    Nanocom, D2 TD5 only.

Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst ... 34567 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!