Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 44

Thread: Farewell

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Torres Straits
    Posts
    3,503
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Good onya Paul,
    now go take a hammer to a few panels to further increase your OCF

    S
    '95 130 dual cab fender (gone to a better universe)
    '10 130 dual cab fender (getting to know it's neurons)

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Exmouth/Tom Price
    Posts
    419
    Total Downloaded
    0
    [QUOTE=land864;1459214]See Pilbara

    No one but no one just goes cold turkey off AULRO [/QUOTE

    Good to see.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    under a rock, next to a tree, at Broadmarsh
    Posts
    6,738
    Total Downloaded
    0

    going nuts

    deleted this post, sorry but it didnt look right.

    Cheers Arthur
    Last edited by wrinklearthur; 8th April 2011 at 10:41 PM. Reason: didn't look right

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    South Yundreup,WA.
    Posts
    7,468
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Sounds a little like sour grapes.
    Not really a reason to take your bat and ball and go.
    If you enter into a debate, provide the facts, not theory or fiction (unless of course that is what is being discussed). If you can not, then humbly back off.
    I for one have been in plenty of differing discussions and on occasion have felt the same and thought about backing out, but did not especially when I knew I was right. On occasion the person who actually knew SFA and was only voicing their opinion and not fact has got the upper hand, but most times I will re group and fight back.
    Unfortunately in this case I think you may be wrong and you may not want to admit it or may genuinely think you are right and that is ok.
    I too have been down that path and also proven wrong and just moved on.
    You should really consider that. Would you leave your employment over such a disagreement?
    Hope you think about it a bit as all comers are welcome here, but in the end it is your choice.
    2011 Discovery 4 TDV6
    2009 DRZ400E Suzuki
    1956 & 1961 P4 Rover (project)
    1976 SS Torana (project - all cash donations or parts accepted)
    2003 WK Holden Statesman
    Departed
    2000 Defender Extreme: Shrek (but only to son)
    84 RR (Gone) 97 Tdi Disco (Gone)
    98 Ducati 900SS Gone & Missed

    Facta Non Verba

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Melbourne, mostly
    Posts
    2,442
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I think another lesson is not to back people into a corner, or back yourself into a corner. That way if you do need to change your mind you'll be able to do so without loss of face.

    Also, if you give someone an 'out' which allows them to change view without you doing a public victory dance they'll be forever grateful and that will pay off in future posts.

    Crushing an oppponent on line is really very much a short-term victory.

  6. #36
    Wilbur Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by CraigE View Post
    Sounds a little like sour grapes.
    Not really a reason to take your bat and ball and go.
    If you enter into a debate, provide the facts, not theory or fiction (unless of course that is what is being discussed). If you can not, then humbly back off............

    .....Unfortunately in this case I think you may be wrong and you may not want to admit it or may genuinely think you are right and that is ok.
    Agreed, CraigE, it was childish to take my bat and ball and walk away, a knee jerk reaction because it seemed that one set of rules applied to me and another to everyone else. It was not sour grapes. I see now I would have been better to argue back within the rules allowed to me.

    It is difficult though to know what you mean by "provide the facts, not theory or fiction". I felt (and feel) that I WAS quoting facts. I did not cite references, but then neither did the other contributors.

    If I am shown to be wrong, I have no problem admitting it - I have had plenty of practice doing so! However, though I may walk away from a discussion when I feel I am batting my head against a brick wall, I won't walk away saying I was wrong unless I believe I WAS wrong. In this case, I am morally and absolutely convinced that I was completely correct, but as a lone voice against the aggressive 'opposition' I gave up.

    Of course in a forum like this there should be no concept of arguing back, or opposition.

    I would like to write a short essay on battery management and post it here. I am not sure it will be welcome, but when I get time I will do it. It might well save someone from grief.

    Cheers,

    Paul

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Melbourne, mostly
    Posts
    2,442
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Wilbur

    Yes, please write it up, it'll be reviewed by all and added to the FAQ.

  8. #38
    miky Guest
    I seem to disagree with most people, there again I believe that there are two ways of doing things...

    My way, and the wrong way.





    .

  9. #39
    Narangga's Avatar
    Narangga is offline TopicToaster Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    McMinns Lagoon NT
    Posts
    4,531
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Wilbur View Post
    Thank you all very much for your replies. I guess I did do the dummy spit too easily, and the fact is this is a great forum, and I would like to continue to be a part of it.

    The hassle was over the best way to charge batteries. My experience has been with stand-alone solar power systems not automotive, but the principles are the same. With solar power, we aim to maximise the time the appliances will run before the batteries are discharged (cloudy days etc) and to maximise the life of the batteries. Much the same applies to vehicle 'house' batteries.

    Again, thanks for waking me up!

    Cheers,

    Paul
    Trust that you will continue to fare well as you have an ongoing contribution to the forum as a whole.
    Cheers, Dale
    PIC - It comes with the Territory

    'The D3' - 2006 TDV6 HSE
    2008 Kimberley Kamper Sports RV
    Previously Enjoyed:
    2002 Adventure Offroad Campers 'Cape York'
    2000 D2 Td5 - plus!
    1997 Defender 110 Wagon - fully carpeted

  10. #40
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    2,827
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by roverrescue View Post
    'akelly' Ive been formulating on this all for a whiles now. Im not yet certain all variables have been accounted for but I think that we can simplify the relatively recent changes to the overall vibe of AULRO with the following:

    OCF α {1 / (TocL x $) + (bnt)}

    where:
    OCF: Overall Chill Factor
    TocL: Tare of chosen Landy
    $: price of chosen Landy
    (bnt) bent'n'twisted to pristine panel ratio


    It seems, from my looking through 'The Pinnacles', as chosen landy price and weight increases... chill factor markedly decreases? Note that I wasnt sure quite how to factor in the bent'n'twisted to pristine panel ratio, my gut feeling is that it needs a weighting factor - but Ill leave that to the crowd to decide.

    Steve
    You may need to apply a co-efficient to the bent' n' twisted factor according to what caused the bent'n'twisted. I.e Car park of actual off roading.

    cheers

Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!